Hearthpwn

Totally agreed, the only way i win vs a hunter is when they have an awful hand. 

was about to break r8 then three hunters decided to show up. scrubs will be scrubs.

Quote from sLywayzz »

was about to break r8 then three hunters decided to show up. scrubs will be scrubs.

You usually have to play vs hunter or *insert any aggro deck* at rank 3-10 very often. Warlock giant shouldn't be a good choice here.

Even now many people even play hunter at legend rank so idk, play warlock giant at your own risk, when you reach rank 3.

Yeah i changed to play hunter to power rank and it has worked very well. Its just a no brainer deck, go for the face 90% of the time. But as soon as i hit rank 3 i started seeing more control decks, more control warriors, druids, pallys Etc ... Sadly i deranked because i persisted with hunter at this point hahaaha ....

I've been on a ladder climb mode this last week, Saturday until now, as I haven't had much chance to play much this month. Currently sitting at rank 5 having played nothing but handlock to get from 12-5 at about an 80% win rate ( So not many games). I'm not seeing much aggro, a ton of control warrior, druid, and midrange shamans though.

The mages(2-3) I've been seeing are either really good, or I'm just so bad at the mage matchup it seems like a solid ass kicking every game.

If the hunter makes the mistake of waiting for their big combos, you have a chance. I won some games where I facelessed an argused mountain giant. Im still like 20% vs hunter though. Im good vs murlocs but the aggro lock with "you dear summon me" is hard.

Druids are so helpless vs my giants with no tinkmaster, haha! If handlock gets too popular, they probably start running 2x BGH...