What is gross?And the reason behind that stupid answer?And probably behind the downvote?
it's just a budget version of the deck 1 in every 6 people has been running on ladder for the past 3 weeks. Hence the negative reaction.
Yeah and that is the reason this deck should not fade in the dust because of some salty downvotes.Don't forget Hearthstone has new players and new players want to win some games and climb too.And if not only that,91% win rate is even better than some of the original lists out there.
If you really think that way and this deck has that high winrate (which i doubt), post a guide instead of asking for likes first :I
How can you doubt something that has legit proof?And as i told in another quote,guide takes time to complete.Why do it if noone notices the deck?
There's nothing new here to be honest. Same shaman deck that everyone plays but without Bloodmage Thalnos and Lava Burst for some reason.
A very good reason for this would be that this deck a very friendly to newer players of hearthstone.And believe me Bloodlust has some great merits to it.
A "very friendly to newer players" deck that includes cards from LoE as well as ONaK packing a more situational legendary in Patches the Pirate then something you can use in pretty much every class that uses spells like Bloodmage Thalnos?
You are not seriously thinking that Patches the Pirate is situational on aggro Shaman now are you?Because it fits in aggro Shaman more than Bloodmage Thalnos .And well if you gave the deck a try you could see the meaning behind this in the first 2-3 games.
I think it's time people stop with the 90+% win rate deck bullshit... Most of the best decks out there have at max 55-60% win rate when you have played many games. Fine you got lucky and went on a wining streak to rank 5, but that doesen't make your deck a fucking 200% win rate deck.. Like for example I went yesterday from rank 13 to 5 with only 2 losses, but that doesen't make my deck 99% win rate, does it ?
It does,when there is proof of it that happened.And the proof saying 91% can you deny that proof.?22-2 is not just LUCK.Ofcourse it takes skill too,but depending on your negativity,i guess you are one of those "never lucky" guys am i rite?
Bro what I'm trying to say is that 24 games is too small of a sample for a win rate.... play atleast 100-150 games and then brag about the 90% win rate lol.
The point is i dont have time to play that much,i wanted something to carry me to rank 5 fast and i got it.I dont have time to hit legend but if i could i would do it.I just dont understand your frustration.The deck isnt listed as a legend deck but as a rank 5 deck.please.
There's nothing new here to be honest. Same shaman deck that everyone plays but without Bloodmage Thalnos and Lava Burst for some reason.
A very good reason for this would be that this deck a very friendly to newer players of hearthstone.And believe me Bloodlust has some great merits to it.
A "very friendly to newer players" deck that includes cards from LoE as well as ONaK packing a more situational legendary in Patches the Pirate then something you can use in pretty much every class that uses spells like Bloodmage Thalnos?
You are not seriously thinking that Patches the Pirate is situational on aggro Shaman now are you?Because it fits in aggro Shaman more than Bloodmage Thalnos .And well if you gave the deck a try you could see the meaning behind this in the first 2-3 games.
Just saying that you can fit thalnos in more decks then patches=> the new player deck thingy but that doesn't really contribute to this post tbh.
There's nothing new here to be honest. Same shaman deck that everyone plays but without Bloodmage Thalnos and Lava Burst for some reason.
A very good reason for this would be that this deck a very friendly to newer players of hearthstone.And believe me Bloodlust has some great merits to it.
A "very friendly to newer players" deck that includes cards from LoE as well as ONaK packing a more situational legendary in Patches the Pirate then something you can use in pretty much every class that uses spells like Bloodmage Thalnos?
You are not seriously thinking that Patches the Pirate is situational on aggro Shaman now are you?Because it fits in aggro Shaman more than Bloodmage Thalnos .And well if you gave the deck a try you could see the meaning behind this in the first 2-3 games.
Just saying that you can fit thalnos in more decks then patches=> the new player deck thingy but that doesn't really contribute to this post tbh.
Most decks if not every deck (besides Priest,warlock and druid)use patches as an early game.Please correct me if im wrong.
Btw, I was not the one who downvoted. Not that I really care, just throwing it out there.
It's gross because it's a typical net-deck Shaman list that 20+% of the ladder is running. It's gross because you dedicated a thread to a deck that everyone knows about. If it was something innovative I might have given you credit. I am in no way salty about Shamans remaining dominant, I can tech against them easily enough. I just have a hard time with why someone thinks that the forum needs to see this? And what do you put in the guide? "Mulligan for 1-2 drops, play minions on curve, fire spells at face, rinse, repeat"? I fail to see the skill involved that would warrant a guide...
Also, how big of a sample size is that 91%? If less than 30 games, then please mention that when claiming a "win rate".
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nature is the Day. Man is the Sun. Woman is the Moon. The Stone is the Sky. The Art is the Way.
I think it's time people stop with the 90+% win rate deck bullshit... Most of the best decks out there have at max 55-60% win rate when you have played many games. Fine you got lucky and went on a wining streak to rank 5, but that doesen't make your deck a fucking 200% win rate deck.. Like for example I went yesterday from rank 13 to 5 with only 2 losses, but that doesen't make my deck 99% win rate, does it ?
It does,when there is proof of it that happened.And the proof saying 91% can you deny that proof.?22-2 is not just LUCK.Ofcourse it takes skill too,but depending on your negativity,i guess you are one of those "never lucky" guys am i rite?
Bro what I'm trying to say is that 24 games is too small of a sample for a win rate.... play atleast 100-150 games and then brag about the 90% win rate lol.
The point is i dont have time to play that much,i wanted something to carry me to rank 5 fast and i got it.I dont have time to hit legend but if i could i would do it.I just dont understand your frustration.The deck isnt listed as a legend deck but as a rank 5 deck.please.
My frustraton is only abot the win rate and nothing more... What Im saying is that it's not correct to claim your deck is 91% win rate becouse It's not possible. You can say that you did really well with the deck and went 22-2 with it to rank 5 and thats ok. Don't get offended I'm not talking particularly about you, but to all the people who claim cosmic win rates on their decks.
Okay,my deck has 91% win rate at 24 games played.Is that wrong too?
Btw, I was not the one who downvoted. Not that I really care, just throwing it out there.
It's gross because it's a typical net-deck Shaman list that 20+% of the ladder is running. It's gross because you dedicated a thread to a deck that everyone knows about. If it was something innovative I might have given you credit. I am in no way salty about Shamans remaining dominant, I can tech against them easily enough. I just have a hard time with why someone thinks that the forum needs to see this? And what do you put in the guide? "Mulligan for 1-2 drops, play minions on curve, fire spells at face, rinse, repeat"? I fail to see the skill involved that would warrant a guide...
Also, how big of a sample size is that 91%? If less than 30 games, then please mention that when claiming a "win rate".
Friend,if you dont care dont just go and throw stupid replies on threads for no reason.Just let it go and move on.
I think it's time people stop with the 90+% win rate deck bullshit... Most of the best decks out there have at max 55-60% win rate when you have played many games. Fine you got lucky and went on a wining streak to rank 5, but that doesen't make your deck a fucking 200% win rate deck.. Like for example I went yesterday from rank 13 to 5 with only 2 losses, but that doesen't make my deck 99% win rate, does it ?
It does,when there is proof of it that happened.And the proof saying 91% can you deny that proof.?22-2 is not just LUCK.Ofcourse it takes skill too,but depending on your negativity,i guess you are one of those "never lucky" guys am i rite?
Bro what I'm trying to say is that 24 games is too small of a sample for a win rate.... play atleast 100-150 games and then brag about the 90% win rate lol.
The point is i dont have time to play that much,i wanted something to carry me to rank 5 fast and i got it.I dont have time to hit legend but if i could i would do it.I just dont understand your frustration.The deck isnt listed as a legend deck but as a rank 5 deck.please.
My frustraton is only abot the win rate and nothing more... What Im saying is that it's not correct to claim your deck is 91% win rate becouse It's not possible. You can say that you did really well with the deck and went 22-2 with it to rank 5 and thats ok. Don't get offended I'm not talking particularly about you, but to all the people who claim cosmic win rates on their decks.
Okay,my deck has 91% win rate at 24 games played.Is that wrong too?
No, thats fine. Now just mention that in the title and you're good to go!
I dont think i have to write it down for people to see that i have only played 24 games.It's on pics from track-o-bot on my profile.
There's nothing new here to be honest. Same shaman deck that everyone plays but without Bloodmage Thalnos and Lava Burst for some reason.
A very good reason for this would be that this deck a very friendly to newer players of hearthstone.And believe me Bloodlust has some great merits to it.
A "very friendly to newer players" deck that includes cards from LoE as well as ONaK packing a more situational legendary in Patches the Pirate then something you can use in pretty much every class that uses spells like Bloodmage Thalnos?
You are not seriously thinking that Patches the Pirate is situational on aggro Shaman now are you?Because it fits in aggro Shaman more than Bloodmage Thalnos .And well if you gave the deck a try you could see the meaning behind this in the first 2-3 games.
Just saying that you can fit thalnos in more decks then patches=> the new player deck thingy but that doesn't really contribute to this post tbh.
Most decks if not every deck (besides Priest,warlock and druid)use patches as an early game.Please correct me if im wrong.
Mage, Jade Rogue, CW, Hunter, Paladin, other forms of Shaman, probably others as well such as Raptor Rogue and ofc basically all the casual builds.
But I digress. You totally are missing the point. Patches is more of a staple to aggro decks RIGHT NOW, but Thalnos is a WAAAAAAAY better card overall, and much more valuable to have. The variety of decks in which you can use him effectively are more numerous that those of Patches. Patches is a passing fad, or even just a common annoyance at the very worst. Thalnos has been considered one of the best cards in the game since day 1, which btw is another way that Thalnos is superior: he's in the Classic set, aka no rotation. Also, I would still argue that Thalnos is better in the deck you posted than Patches. Patches will give you 1-3 extra damage at best, where Thalnos can provide a LOT more extra damage than that, plus he draws you a card. The synergy Thalnos has with your spells is greater and more valuable than the synergy that Patches provides, or rather benefits from.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nature is the Day. Man is the Sun. Woman is the Moon. The Stone is the Sky. The Art is the Way.
91% of a small sample size on the last days of the season? Wow. Repeat that in the first 5 days of January and I start to be impressed. At present it's just a click-bait title for a common Aggro Shaman. Nothing more to see here.
The true test when win rate only really matters is rank 5-legend. any higher rank then that is not worth mentioning. There's a difference between beating bad players and a deck actually having a statistically higher percent chance of winning.
Can the salty butthurt people not respond on this thread anymore please?I will only answer civilized people only.Thanks
Whoa whoa whoa. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Damn millennials... "Boo-hoo, someone said something negative, and I'm entitled to only receive positive feedback, therefore the negative people are not allowed to have or post their opinions."
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nature is the Day. Man is the Sun. Woman is the Moon. The Stone is the Sky. The Art is the Way.
There's nothing new here to be honest. Same shaman deck that everyone plays but without Bloodmage Thalnos and Lava Burst for some reason.
A very good reason for this would be that this deck a very friendly to newer players of hearthstone.And believe me Bloodlust has some great merits to it.
A "very friendly to newer players" deck that includes cards from LoE as well as ONaK packing a more situational legendary in Patches the Pirate then something you can use in pretty much every class that uses spells like Bloodmage Thalnos?
You are not seriously thinking that Patches the Pirate is situational on aggro Shaman now are you?Because it fits in aggro Shaman more than Bloodmage Thalnos .And well if you gave the deck a try you could see the meaning behind this in the first 2-3 games.
Just saying that you can fit thalnos in more decks then patches=> the new player deck thingy but that doesn't really contribute to this post tbh.
Most decks if not every deck (besides Priest,warlock and druid)use patches as an early game.Please correct me if im wrong.
Mage, Jade Rogue, CW, Hunter, Paladin, other forms of Shaman, probably others as well such as Raptor Rogue and ofc basically all the casual builds.
But I digress. You totally are missing the point. Patches is more of a staple to aggro decks RIGHT NOW, but Thalnos is a WAAAAAAAY better card overall, and much more valuable to have. The variety of decks in which you can use him effectively are more numerous that those of Patches. Patches is a passing fad, or even just a common annoyance at the very worst. Thalnos has been considered one of the best cards in the game since day 1, which btw is another way that Thalnos is superior: he's in the Classic set, aka no rotation. Also, I would still argue that Thalnos is better in the deck you posted than Patches. Patches will give you 1-3 extra damage at best, where Thalnos can provide a LOT more extra damage than that, plus he draws you a card. The synergy Thalnos has with your spells is greater and more valuable than the synergy that Patches provides, or rather benefits from.
Well,this is the deck i used and this is the deck that worked for me.You can try it and tell me your opinions on how well or bad it performed.As for the draw mana tide in most occasions draw you more than 1 card.
Can the salty butthurt people not respond on this thread anymore please?I will only answer civilized people only.Thanks
Whoa whoa whoa. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Damn millennials... "Boo-hoo, someone said something negative, and I'm entitled to only receive positive feedback, therefore the negative people are not allowed to have or post their opinions."
You might enjoy being negative and spreading negativity on people who you dont even know,me personaly dont like it.So i dont want to contribute to that.:)
Step 1: Play cards that are lit up, any of them will do.
Step 2: Go face.*
*In case of Taunts write a ticket to Blizzard complaining about cheats.
Step 3: Go on forums and post an extremely common list created by someone else as your own and add in an absurd win rate from a small sample size, with no proof, for good measure to show your skill.
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Wow, such an innovative deck...
Downvoted.
Btw, I was not the one who downvoted. Not that I really care, just throwing it out there.
It's gross because it's a typical net-deck Shaman list that 20+% of the ladder is running. It's gross because you dedicated a thread to a deck that everyone knows about. If it was something innovative I might have given you credit. I am in no way salty about Shamans remaining dominant, I can tech against them easily enough. I just have a hard time with why someone thinks that the forum needs to see this? And what do you put in the guide? "Mulligan for 1-2 drops, play minions on curve, fire spells at face, rinse, repeat"? I fail to see the skill involved that would warrant a guide...
Also, how big of a sample size is that 91%? If less than 30 games, then please mention that when claiming a "win rate".
Nature is the Day.
Man is the Sun.
Woman is the Moon.
The Stone is the Sky.
The Art is the Way.
Can the salty butthurt people not respond on this thread anymore please?I will only answer civilized people only.Thanks
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Nature is the Day.
Man is the Sun.
Woman is the Moon.
The Stone is the Sky.
The Art is the Way.
91% of a small sample size on the last days of the season? Wow. Repeat that in the first 5 days of January and I start to be impressed. At present it's just a click-bait title for a common Aggro Shaman. Nothing more to see here.
The true test when win rate only really matters is rank 5-legend. any higher rank then that is not worth mentioning. There's a difference between beating bad players and a deck actually having a statistically higher percent chance of winning.
Nature is the Day.
Man is the Sun.
Woman is the Moon.
The Stone is the Sky.
The Art is the Way.
Wow, this deck is so innovative and exciting!
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Guide:
Step 1: Play cards that are lit up, any of them will do.
Step 2: Go face.*
*In case of Taunts write a ticket to Blizzard complaining about cheats.
Step 3: Go on forums and post an extremely common list created by someone else as your own and add in an absurd win rate from a small sample size, with no proof, for good measure to show your skill.
Cut and paste aggro shaman. Congrats!!!!!