I had a 100% winrate with it going from rank 9 to 5. These 10 games are statistically relevant and the deck even wins 100% of the time in mirror matches ^^. But mainly it was because I did these games yesterday and not at the start of the month.
But now srsly in regard to your posted deck: Why BL? Why no Leeroy? Why no Thalnos? I can understand that it works, because it is ~25/30 cards of the now standard aggro shaman shell. But I don't think that BL and Mana Tide Totem fit in there. Better throw in aforementioned cards or go the slower totem route with Thing from below.
Honestly,BL has won me more games than lava burst did.I have tried both,and what not list of aggro shaman.It just worked better for me.At times when you draw lava burst it was only a deal 5 dmg card.While it sometimes is a good finisher,most of the times you have more than 4 bodies on the board.Meaning you can finish the game way earlier instead of using lava burst to take control of the board.BL also helps a lot on taking care of a big taunt and apply damage to face aswell.Leeroy is the same,i dont like keeping cards in hand till i can finish the game.It delays the purpose.Thalnos only draw you one card.Mana tide is more of a threat if left aside,so they will either use a hard removal on it or it will draw you more cards.Thalnos on the other hand only draws you one no matter what and is way easily removed.I hope i explained your questions perfectly :)
Promotion of self made decks through new threads should be banned. ( if someone wants to ask something about the decks, or needs help in refining his own deck then it's a different situation). There is literally another section for posting decks in hearthpwn.
People in this thread who complain that Aggro decks is only about playing on curve and has very little skill required makes me laugh when they perceive to be doing otherwise themselves by playing other decks.
Promotion of self made decks through new threads should be banned. ( if someone wants to ask something about the decks, or needs help in refining his own deck then it's a different situation). There is literally another section for posting decks in hearthpwn.
I have no problem if admins move the thread to the corresponding forum then.I just didnt know where to post it.
People in this thread who complain that Aggro decks is only about playing on curve and has very little skill required makes me laugh when they perceive to be doing otherwise themselves by playing other decks.
That is completely true my friend :) As i said in previous quotes.My main was CW.But in any case,i never raged at aggro.I just embraced it.
People in this thread who complain that Aggro decks is only about playing on curve and has very little skill required makes me laugh when they perceive to be doing otherwise themselves by playing other decks.
Evidently you've never tried Rogue with any sliver of success.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nature is the Day. Man is the Sun. Woman is the Moon. The Stone is the Sky. The Art is the Way.
Promotion of self made decks through new threads should be banned. ( if someone wants to ask something about the decks, or needs help in refining his own deck then it's a different situation). There is literally another section for posting decks in hearthpwn.
I have no problem if admins move the thread to the corresponding forum then.I just didnt know where to post it.
Make a deck in the decks section in hearthpwn, and leave it there. No need to make an unnecessary thread about it when TBH it's just a variant of aggro shaman when is played by 40% of the ladder right now.
I had a 100% winrate with it going from rank 9 to 5. These 10 games are statistically relevant and the deck even wins 100% of the time in mirror matches ^^. But mainly it was because I did these games yesterday and not at the start of the month.
But now srsly in regard to your posted deck: Why BL? Why no Leeroy? Why no Thalnos? I can understand that it works, because it is ~25/30 cards of the now standard aggro shaman shell. But I don't think that BL and Mana Tide Totem fit in there. Better throw in aforementioned cards or go the slower totem route with Thing from below.
Honestly,BL has won me more games than lava burst did.I have tried both,and what not list of aggro shaman.It just worked better for me.At times when you draw lava burst it was only a deal 5 dmg card.While it sometimes is a good finisher,most of the times you have more than 4 bodies on the board.Meaning you can finish the game way earlier instead of using lava burst to take control of the board.BL also helps a lot on taking care of a big taunt and apply damage to face aswell.Leeroy is the same,i dont like keeping cards in hand till i can finish the game.It delays the purpose.Thalnos only draw you one card.Mana tide is more of a threat if left aside,so they will either use a hard removal on it or it will draw you more cards.Thalnos on the other hand only draws you one no matter what and is way easily removed.I hope i explained your questions perfectly :)
Hey,
in respect to Thalnos --> it serves as an activator for your spirit claws and is used in combination with maelstrom portal for board clear. I think that you perhaps are more of a boardcentric player, so that bloodlust gets the value. The use of Lava Burst is normally to have reach (means you keep it often times to squeeze in the last 5/6 dmg around taunts).
Bloodlust will help you win the game before the taunt is played.Thats all i have to say.
Promotion of self made decks through new threads should be banned. ( if someone wants to ask something about the decks, or needs help in refining his own deck then it's a different situation). There is literally another section for posting decks in hearthpwn.
I have no problem if admins move the thread to the corresponding forum then.I just didnt know where to post it.
Make a deck in the decks section in hearthpwn, and leave it there. No need to make an unnecessary thread about it when TBH it's just a variant of aggro shaman when is played by 40% of the ladder right now.
I wanted the deck to be seen so people could try it out.I dont know whats your problem...Just dont see it if you dont like it.
Simply: It's midrange-shaman, the grossest deck in the last meta mixed with pirates, the grossest deck in the current meta. Don't think it's bad at all, still not a fan! (but i won't downvote the deck)
Simply: It's midrange-shaman, the grossest deck in the last meta mixed with pirates, the grossest deck in the current meta. Don't think it's bad at all, still not a fan! (but i won't downvote the deck)
It's AGGRO, not midrange. Learn the difference.
Listen, it's Thrall/Morgl; deck type is irrelevant! /s
Midrange Shaman was gross last expansion mainly because there wasn't a lot to contest it (Face Hunter, Control Warrior, Freeze Mage), this expansion that doesn't appear to remotely be the case. We can probably drop the "Shaman players are cheaters" attitudes now.
Btw, I was not the one who downvoted. Not that I really care, just throwing it out there.
It's gross because it's a typical net-deck Shaman list that 20+% of the ladder is running. It's gross because you dedicated a thread to a deck that everyone knows about. If it was something innovative I might have given you credit. I am in no way salty about Shamans remaining dominant, I can tech against them easily enough. I just have a hard time with why someone thinks that the forum needs to see this? And what do you put in the guide? "Mulligan for 1-2 drops, play minions on curve, fire spells at face, rinse, repeat"? I fail to see the skill involved that would warrant a guide...
Also, how big of a sample size is that 91%? If less than 30 games, then please mention that when claiming a "win rate".
Step 1: Play cards that are lit up, any of them will do.
Step 2: Go face.*
*In case of Taunts write a ticket to Blizzard complaining about cheats.
Step 3: Go on forums and post an extremely common list created by someone else as your own and add in an absurd win rate from a small sample size, with no proof, for good measure to show your skill.
I just want to help people reach a high rank or a higher than they ever have.
if this were true, you'd post the guide without demanding tribute
This comes from a guy that has never created a deck.A guide takes time to create and make it proper for the people to read.If the deck has no views or people interested in,then there's no reason to waste hours of making a guide if noone will see it .
Feel free to apologize after checking out my YouTube channel, ywia.
so are you going to provide a guide if it gets to fifty dislikes?
I will just let all the butthurt salt pass in...nothing i can do for salty people it seems.
My recommendation is that you post that guide you were saving for 50 likes or whatever. It'll show people that your only desire was helping them improve and that you weren't looking only for attention by copying a deck that everyone knows.
I mean, you can't honestly believe that you're helping someone by copying a deck, changing 5 cards and asking us to give you likes, right? But if you actually try to help people by posting something helpful (like a guide) there'll be no doubt that you want to help (even if the guide is not great).
Your argument is valid enough.I will do it because im feeling bad after all that hate im receiving for no reason.But still,can't understand why people are this mad.
Btw, I was not the one who downvoted. Not that I really care, just throwing it out there.
It's gross because it's a typical net-deck Shaman list that 20+% of the ladder is running. It's gross because you dedicated a thread to a deck that everyone knows about. If it was something innovative I might have given you credit. I am in no way salty about Shamans remaining dominant, I can tech against them easily enough. I just have a hard time with why someone thinks that the forum needs to see this? And what do you put in the guide? "Mulligan for 1-2 drops, play minions on curve, fire spells at face, rinse, repeat"? I fail to see the skill involved that would warrant a guide...
Also, how big of a sample size is that 91%? If less than 30 games, then please mention that when claiming a "win rate".
Step 1: Play cards that are lit up, any of them will do.
Step 2: Go face.*
*In case of Taunts write a ticket to Blizzard complaining about cheats.
Step 3: Go on forums and post an extremely common list created by someone else as your own and add in an absurd win rate from a small sample size, with no proof, for good measure to show your skill.
I mean I definitely understand the idea of not wanting to spend the time on something people won't look at, but if your desire is to create content (be it Youtube, Twitch, blogs, deck guides, literally anything) you can't really approach it that way. It's the same thing with content providers everywhere, gating your content behind something your audience has to do for you first like some kind of ransom is just going to make them want your content even less and harbor resentment about it.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Articles I suggest every player reads to improve at the game;
Yes, it is. The deck that I've made is total trash, but they seem to enjoy this kind of "innovative" decks. I am not a fan of aggro and I'd rather play Control Shaman than this, but that gives me no right to make fun of someone who makes changes to an aggro deck. Also, let's say you were showing a Renolock list with some untested / uncommon cards. Most of them would congratulate you for your out-of-the-box thinking yet if you put Bloodlust in Aggro Shaman, you get the ultimate hatred. Not fair, I'd say.
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Promotion of self made decks through new threads should be banned. ( if someone wants to ask something about the decks, or needs help in refining his own deck then it's a different situation). There is literally another section for posting decks in hearthpwn.
People in this thread who complain that Aggro decks is only about playing on curve and has very little skill required makes me laugh when they perceive to be doing otherwise themselves by playing other decks.
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Nature is the Day.
Man is the Sun.
Woman is the Moon.
The Stone is the Sky.
The Art is the Way.
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
so are you going to provide a guide if it gets to fifty dislikes?
Articles I suggest every player reads to improve at the game;
MTG/Hearthstone biases to avoid
Reframing negative Hearthstone experiences to improve at the game
Who's the Beatdown?
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
Just Another Legend Player#Kappa
I mean I definitely understand the idea of not wanting to spend the time on something people won't look at, but if your desire is to create content (be it Youtube, Twitch, blogs, deck guides, literally anything) you can't really approach it that way. It's the same thing with content providers everywhere, gating your content behind something your audience has to do for you first like some kind of ransom is just going to make them want your content even less and harbor resentment about it.
Articles I suggest every player reads to improve at the game;
MTG/Hearthstone biases to avoid
Reframing negative Hearthstone experiences to improve at the game
Who's the Beatdown?
Yes, it is. The deck that I've made is total trash, but they seem to enjoy this kind of "innovative" decks. I am not a fan of aggro and I'd rather play Control Shaman than this, but that gives me no right to make fun of someone who makes changes to an aggro deck. Also, let's say you were showing a Renolock list with some untested / uncommon cards. Most of them would congratulate you for your out-of-the-box thinking yet if you put Bloodlust in Aggro Shaman, you get the ultimate hatred. Not fair, I'd say.