Hearthpwn

Quote from Tze >>

I mean I definitely understand the idea of not wanting to spend the time on something people won't look at, but if your desire is to create content (be it Youtube, Twitch, blogs, deck guides, literally anything) you can't really approach it that way. It's the same thing with content providers everywhere, gating your content behind something your audience has to do for you first like some kind of ransom is just going to make them want your content even less and harbor resentment about it.

Quote from Sera31 >>

Quote from Tze >>

I mean I definitely understand the idea of not wanting to spend the time on something people won't look at, but if your desire is to create content (be it Youtube, Twitch, blogs, deck guides, literally anything) you can't really approach it that way. It's the same thing with content providers everywhere, gating your content behind something your audience has to do for you first like some kind of ransom is just going to make them want your content even less and harbor resentment about it.

 Great point, well made :)

Quote from AndreiRO >>

Yes, it is. The deck that I've made is total trash, but they seem to enjoy this kind of "innovative" decks. I am not a fan of aggro and I'd rather play Control Shaman than this, but that gives me no right to make fun of someone who makes changes to an aggro deck. Also, let's say you were showing a Renolock list with some untested / uncommon cards. Most of them would congratulate you for your out-of-the-box thinking yet if you put Bloodlust in Aggro Shaman, you get the ultimate hatred. Not fair, I'd say.

Quote from Fheny123 >>

This deck is not new just because you changed 2 cards. And you just played 24 games and won 22, im so impressed... Try legend with it and post again.. 

Quote from T18delusional >>

YOU don't needn't any kind of knowledge to make the changes you did . What will did it take to change some cards that some people already use ? You've given an unoriginal deck worse than the standard and just as hard to make so it is not easier for newcomers . 90% is rediculous , no deck has that consitancy over a large time , if you know anything about deck making you would know that . 

 

Quote from Innkeeper27 >>

Quote from T18delusional >>

YOU don't needn't any kind of knowledge to make the changes you did . What will did it take to change some cards that some people already use ? You've given an unoriginal deck worse than the standard and just as hard to make so it is not easier for newcomers . 90% is rediculous , no deck has that consitancy over a large time , if you know anything about deck making you would know that . 

 

 Stupid people cant understand things.Thats all i can say :) 

Please lock this thread. Its OP trolling and others feeding. It's just a thread full of unconstructive rhetoric.

Quote from Dahkss >>

Quote from Tze >>

 

It's not really that, sometimes locking your content behind "suscriptors only" or "share in social networks" will give you better results in the long term. The thing is, you need to be able to clearly convey the value of your product and never ask for something before giving something else in return.

 

Real example: I want people to buy my online course, so I give away the first 2 modules so they're not buying blindly and they trust that I know that I'm talking about. It's the same with subscribers, likes, or any other thing. People are not going to do anything unless you can prove that you're worth it.

 

A more close example would be Hearthstone coaches, for example. They move and help people for free so everyone can see that they know the deal and, if someone wants more in-depth coaching, they'll hire them.

 

What I mean is that you have to respect both your work and your audience. Giving something for free or locking it behind a paywall are strategies that may or may not work well.

He copied pasted the deck that has been around for 6 months! Congratulations my friend, it's been a while since i've seen a list like this on ladder.

Kappa

Improve on your sense of honour, scrub.