Trump's Un'Goro Theorycraft - Quest Hunter
- Last updated Apr 3, 2017 (Aggro Downfall)
- Edit
- |
Wild
- 25 Minions
- 5 Spells
- Deck Type: Theorycraft
- Deck Archetype: Unknown
- Crafting Cost: 5920
- Dust Needed: Loading Collection
- Created: 4/3/2017 (Aggro Downfall)
- Trump
- Pro Player
-
Country:
-
Tournament Decks:
29
-
Ladder Decks:
1117
-
Submitted By:
Link:
BBCode:
Export to
Trump theorycrafted this deck on stream - VOD here
Trump streams regularly on Twitch - Watch here
I had both legendaries, so I decided to give it a try. A complete failure at first, but the situation somewhat improved after I swapped Genzo, the Shark and one of Rat Packs with Tundra Rhinos.
Good point, but could you send me the deck list that's a better version of Trump's? I'm not a huge fan of this deck list and am looking for a better one.
Big downvote...
Hunter is my fav class, i created 2 100upvotes decks here, but.... This cant work!
There is no win condition - No Rhyno, No hyena, no burst...
This deck is just crap
Surely the win condition is the quest? Seems a bit like running a Midrange Shaman without Bloodlust - OK, you're missing out on the instant kill, but you'll have constant control of the board with Carnassa's Brood. Especially seeing as most decks will need to use their AOEs early to deal with your wide boards of 1 drops. You should be able to trade efficiently with Aggro and kill Control before they draw their last AOE. I'd like to see a Tundra Rhino, yeah, but I think this can still work.
I don't play a lot of Hunter, so take that as you will. However, I have played Token Shaman since pre-Naxx, and this seems like it could work along the same lines. IDK, none of us have played with Un'goro yet, so it's all speculation.
Almost everyone can build better hunter deck
Almost everyone can use proper grammar.
My native language is not English, so....
Clap to yourself, man.
I agree with you on this deck man, but there's no need to exaggerate, the most upvotes you have is just over 100.
http://www.hearthpwn.com/members/Tomas13CZ/decks
Good job on that though.
I wonder how that's going to work.
I tried to play a similar decklist, and here's what it looks like:
0 - 5 against quest warrior (even the very primitive ones that just run taunts and practically no spells).
0 - 5 against quest rogue
These are two decks Trump said wouldn't be viable. Do I just suck or are these just terrible match ups for quest hunter?
needs unleash the hounds.
Too many 1-drops in this deck and no Tundra Rhino. I don't think Trump thought much on this deck, he just want to give Genzo a chance. The optimal deck for the hunter quest will probably use less or equal to 7 1-drop minions.
There's alot of draw in this deck and play off curve will slow down the Quest significantly. For consistency minimal 12 1-drop is required. IF YOU PUT EXACT 7 (seven) 1-drop you will be in trouble if your LAST 1-drop is at the bottom of the deck. Math please
You know you don't have to complete the quest if you put it in your deck right? You can build a deck that have other end game other than the quest while still able to complete the quest.
And you can put 7 or less 1-drops and still clear the quest by including Youthful Brewmaster and cards that generate 1-drops in your hand or deck. Will it be optimal or viable? I don't know I am just giving out my opinion so don't try to insult my math skills for no reason.
I understand that you want the secondary combo. But this deck is focus on Quest and try to survive 5 turn + swarm with mini-raptor.
So if you want to create hybrid deck, you should observe meta-analysis first.
all these suicide one-drops and no Scavenging Hyena ?
I tried the hyena. It dies far too easily most of the time. It's only viable if you play it late and immediately kill some of your minions. But that late in the game, you'd hope to have the broodlings from the quest or play something more mid-rangy (which isn't in Trumps list, but I'm trying that, because I'm getting trounced without heavier cards).
I would use Timber Wolf instead of Argent Squire.
It's a 1-Drop and a Beast and synergizes better with the Deck.
And speaking of Beasts, i would prefer Dinomancy instead of Abusive Sergeant.
Yeah, i know, Abusive Sergeant is a 1-Drop and helps you trading in the early Game, but
Dinomancy gets you an overall better trade-up throughout the Game, for most of the Cards are Beast.
I would also considering Starving Buzzard. (!)
Maybe as a one-of but still has a lot of Synergy in this Deck, and can get buffed with Dinomancy
if you wish to... also Dinomancy works with Rat Pack.
Stampede is an Auto-include in my Opinion, because it cycles itself multiple times.
Idk why people think that it wouldn't fit in this Deck.
After you've played Queen Carnassa, there are so many 1-Drops in your Deck, that draw a Card.
You go Stampede into Carnassa's Brood into Carnassa's Brood into Carnassa's Brood, etc.
and get double the Value for each of those Raptors.
Please let me know your thoughts and Opinions onto my suggested Changes.
Morti
Deck looks strong. So many 1 cost minions means early finished quest. But, this also means we will run out of steam very fast. Very few card draws placed compared to huge pool of one drops. if AoE spells used we can't use Cult Master on empty board. And we have to depend on opponent to use our Genzo, the Shark effectively. If Stampede not in hand we will probably be sitting ducks after first few turns.
I don't think Stampede fits this archetype.
Don't get me wrong, I love the card but the deck doesn't really need that much value, Crackling Razormaw seems like a better replacement.