Nope, good try though, I have been taking bm the whole time(go back and read the comments)
However, I am genuinely curious as to why you take the side against bmers and choose to bm on a forum and act all huffy when you get called out for it?
I see that you automatically think a person is huffy when they reply. Bet you also call everyone salty too.
Curious, the guy trying to be a white knight turns out to be an asshole. Interesting.
Well TBH you do sound quite salty...
Just put your faith back in RNGesus... He will show you the way back from the BM...
But seriously since you dont understand yet why there have been some digs at you ITT... because we want to know truly from you... Is it that hard being compassionate to ppl, it is just a game after all? Does BMing really make you feel that great? doesnt winning alone give you pride or self-worth? why does it take you tearing someone else down, to build yourself up? I mean isnt it the reason we come onto forums in the first place is to help people or be helped ourselves, discuss new tactics? Why would you not be gracious in victory as in defeat?
well.. I guess youve already answered these questions... but those are the questions ppl seriously ask to themselves when they face players like you, and unfortunately they correlate that to real life and probably think your the same way there... your probably not really a bad person so why make ppl think you are online?
I have seen this post 10 times in, what feels like, a week... Yea it's a cool idea, but blizzard won't do it... HS is it's own game no point comparing it to other ccgs
Druid is not as "un interactive" as ppl say it is... First of all you have to survive for > 7 turns at least, while contesting the board, and getting your opponent within range... None of that is "easy" by any means... It takes thought as planning through out the game. Also a well timed taunt or loatheb kills any lethal a Druid May have... It is definitely no patron that is for sure (or face decks for that matter) which I feel is very un-interactive... No nerf
disclaimer - I am a Druid player (though I play all forms - with and without combo)
Midrange/control... They are just more fun/satisfying to win with... As an addon I feel the midrange- midrange and control-control match ups are insanely amusing. It's like a chess match going back and forth. Rarely is a game decided on one turn alone and I feel like I'm physically in a match of wits... On the other hand playing against aggro feels like getting hit in the nuts pre-fight, then losing becuz well your already damaged before you get your wits on the battle
If they concede, you are admitting defeat and that makes them feel even better and you are basically ragequitting or going on tilt
I completely disagree... rage-quitting is closing the browser to where it says "your opponent has left" (and yes i do laugh when that happens)... conceding because someone is decides to BM their lethal on you is smart... A) because it usually disappoints the other winning player more (i know because i like to get the lethal blow)... B) I get back that 30-60 seconds to move on to that next game and over 6 hours of gaming that adds up to a lot of games
Bottom line is if you want your lethal then take it... if you want to empty your hand AND have the lethal blow? your going to be sorely disappointed with most players out there that feel it is BM and concede
0
Well TBH you do sound quite salty...
Just put your faith back in RNGesus... He will show you the way back from the BM...
But seriously since you dont understand yet why there have been some digs at you ITT... because we want to know truly from you... Is it that hard being compassionate to ppl, it is just a game after all? Does BMing really make you feel that great? doesnt winning alone give you pride or self-worth? why does it take you tearing someone else down, to build yourself up? I mean isnt it the reason we come onto forums in the first place is to help people or be helped ourselves, discuss new tactics? Why would you not be gracious in victory as in defeat?
well.. I guess youve already answered these questions... but those are the questions ppl seriously ask to themselves when they face players like you, and unfortunately they correlate that to real life and probably think your the same way there... your probably not really a bad person so why make ppl think you are online?
0
This Deck I made has been amazing so far; however, like others ITT its seems im not playing too many actual deathrattle decks... oh well
0
Nope, good try though, I havent said anything of the kind about never BMing (go back and read the comments)...
However, I am genuinely curious why Its okay for you to BM ppl on HS, but someone says a comment on a forum and you get all huffy about it?
Weren't you the one that said, "if they bm, let them bm, don't get all salty and go like "Waaa they are bming Im sad"?
0
I have seen this post 10 times in, what feels like, a week... Yea it's a cool idea, but blizzard won't do it... HS is it's own game no point comparing it to other ccgs
0
Druid is not as "un interactive" as ppl say it is... First of all you have to survive for > 7 turns at least, while contesting the board, and getting your opponent within range... None of that is "easy" by any means... It takes thought as planning through out the game. Also a well timed taunt or loatheb kills any lethal a Druid May have... It is definitely no patron that is for sure (or face decks for that matter) which I feel is very un-interactive... No nerf
disclaimer - I am a Druid player (though I play all forms - with and without combo)
0
Midrange/control... They are just more fun/satisfying to win with... As an addon I feel the midrange- midrange and control-control match ups are insanely amusing. It's like a chess match going back and forth. Rarely is a game decided on one turn alone and I feel like I'm physically in a match of wits... On the other hand playing against aggro feels like getting hit in the nuts pre-fight, then losing becuz well your already damaged before you get your wits on the battle
4
Curious... The guy who "likes" to BM .... Can't take a little BM on a forum?
3
"conceding basically means you admitted defeat" ... Umm yea, that IS what concede means hahaha
Your just showing your a bad sport, and thats okay... "Suum Cuique", as they say
Sorry your life is bad enough that the only way you get enjoyment is BMing people... good luck on that
0
I completely disagree... rage-quitting is closing the browser to where it says "your opponent has left" (and yes i do laugh when that happens)... conceding because someone is decides to BM their lethal on you is smart... A) because it usually disappoints the other winning player more (i know because i like to get the lethal blow)... B) I get back that 30-60 seconds to move on to that next game and over 6 hours of gaming that adds up to a lot of games
Bottom line is if you want your lethal then take it... if you want to empty your hand AND have the lethal blow? your going to be sorely disappointed with most players out there that feel it is BM and concede
4
I do the same, but if they start to clear their hand to BM, then i concede and disallow their precious final blow.
0
Mage could be decent with him
Warlock could be decent, probably not as good as mage with him
Druid, IMO, would be meh at best because of the situational use of hero power in druid
So... to craft? I say wait a while longer to see... plus that rng (to me) is not worth it
0
I like Fjola Lightbane over Eydis Darkbane because of the RNG of darkbane
0
I do and thanks for the nickname allowance!
0
Your amazing! thank you so much!
0
Just missing the "common deck" achievement and have >500 views on
also is it possible to adjust my user name? Im missing a letter in the name.. just curious