• 1

    posted a message on Rise of Shadows Developer Q&A - All Answers

    Alas, no word about unnerfing my dear Yogg :/

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on Dean Ayala Talks About the Nerfs, Jade Concerns, and the Different Hearthstone Design Teams

    Never forget, this used to be the atrocious quality of Q&As. 

    Blizzard has come a long way, I have to admit :P

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Why are people defending Token Druid?
    Quote from Livtraser >>

    People will defend anything, even Big Priest.

    Don't worry OP, if Blizzard decided to nerf Bomb Warrior, Token Druid or anything else, all these apologists would congratulate Blizzard on the nerfs regardless. It's cyclical.

    People will cry over anything, even their own fun decks.

    Don't worry crybabies, if Blizzard decided to nerf every thing we asked for, we can still find new things to whine over, its stupid.

    Right. I hope we don't see you praising Blizzard when the nerf hammer lands, regardless of what it hits :)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Why are people defending Token Druid?

    People will defend anything, even Big Priest.

    Don't worry OP, if Blizzard decided to nerf Bomb Warrior, Token Druid or anything else, all these apologists would congratulate Blizzard on the nerfs regardless. It's cyclical.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on The end of Hearthstone.
    Quote from Haussenfuss >>

    Like every other game, a sizeable portion of the HS player-base has been hoping the game will fail. If you hop onto the LoL forums, or the Dota forums, you'll notice that those games are also "dead" 

     I can't tell about Dota, but LoL has been in a state of decline for a while now (20% of the player-base was gone in 2018, after years of straight growth). Why wouldn't it be reasonable to call it dying? When does it become reasonable to call it dying? Is it only dying if it goes into a state of no-return? Must it be a terminal state? Is this about vocabulary? Would "decaying" or "declining" make the statement truer?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Game of Thrones is disappointing

    Well, Sherman, I'm waiting for your thorough opinion on the first episode :P

    Posted in: General Chat
  • 1

    posted a message on Can we just say it already?
    Quote from OldenGolden >>

    You may be surprised to discover this, but there were, are, and always will be folks like you ready to call every expansion terrible after the first week or less. Just one of those things we all have to put up with in life, like the knee-jerk nerfers or the ones who need to write a long paragraph to tell hundreds of people that they're quitting the game. You even threw in some insults to the game designers, in order to keep the cliché going.

    It's time for the community to step up and start demanding more from our whiners and complainers.

    This comment aged as finely as the Year of the Raven.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on RoS is... GOOD!
    Quote from Hooghout >>

    What is the verdict of the quality of card design in the last 8 months according to the OP? Not that good. So now he's happy. A year from now what will be the verdict of this exp? I'm sure 8 months ago people where happy with the meta then. 

     

    You've hit the nail on the head here. People defended Witchwood when there were complaints that it did very little. People defended BDP when it did nothing to the meta once more. Even in Rastakhan's Rumble, people stepped forward to defend it from criticism. And then the amnesiac hypocrisy kicks in and everyone admits last year was terrible, that now rotations will improve things.

    Take a look at this thread: https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/general-discussion/216553-can-we-just-say-it-already

    The third comment gets a ton of support, and yet none of the upvoters have started a thread now to defend the Year of the Raven. In fact, quite a few of them would probably agree now that the Year of the Raven sucked. Because it is safe to show negativity towards the past. Things can never be bad in the present, though, that's just negativity!

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 6

    posted a message on Half of the Wild problems would be solved if players would play more skilfully

    Big Priest is undefendable. There is no way to weasel the deck out of criticism, even with the L2P excuse, which is new even by HS standards.

    Every other deck can be teched against. Here's the difference: if I put a Dirty Rat or 2 in my deck, I am good to go with proper timing against combo decks. If I put in MC Tech and board clears, I will probably have a chance against aggro. The point of techs is that including them boosts your winrate against a certain match-up.

    To beat Big Priest through deckbuilding, you need a literal whole deck built for it, and not just any deck. It needs to be Shaman or Mage, and fuck you if you play anything else. You must summon at least 3 different minions (which means 2 Saronite Taskmasters still won't work)  for them to have a chance of ruining Eternal Servitude, you must have a Hex/Poly by turn 4 to prevent Barnes BS, and another transform by turn 6. You MUST never ever kill a Ragnaros or you will lose regardless. And you must get 2 huge board clears ready for the spellstones, because even if you somehow polymorph 4 minions of theirs, it will only count as 1 sheep in the ressurrection pool for reasons that are unfathomable to anyone with half a brain cell.

    Say what you want about Mechathun and Odd Pally and whatever else you want, but it takes a severe amount of hypocrisy to tell people to "play better" against Big Priest.

    Posted in: Wild Format
  • 2

    posted a message on What´s up with the Hearthstone community?
    Quote from CrusaderRO >>

    We need some "op, you're a moron" posters on the forum. Their job would be to go and post in every thread that asks for nerfs (or simply complains about some decks/cards) during the first two weeks of any expansion.

    It's the only way to make them feel like crap and stop posting nonsense. If most of their threads would be filled with "op, you're a moron" posts, maybe they'll become afraid of posting and start thinking more.

    Unfortunately this "community" is fueled by this game's target audience. Probably because they beg their parents to buy the bundles for them and such.

     Here are a few stale, sanctimonious replies that people have used to shield the game from criticism since the dawn of time:

    • [Salt Thread]
    • Git gud
    • OP plays X class and is salty
    • X is important for the game (don't forget to go completely silent when it gets nerfed)
    • Im glAD BlIZZ doEsNt LIstEN tO thiS coMmuNitY
    • Accusing OP of playing homebrew decks (only those lose games, right?)
    • Telling OP to switch to Wild/Standard
    • Assuming OP has no tech cards whatsoever (even if he does, it's not enough. 2/3rds of your deck must be tech cards before you can complain)
    • gAEm iS dYinG sIncE bEtA 
    • Telling OP to wait for the next expansion
    • Telling OP it's too early into the current expansion (time these last two carefully and you have a cheap defense 100% of the time! How rad is that?)

    You might be shocked to learn this, but using the same replies every time actually weakens your point. You'll rack up support from people who agree with you and get little more than a glance from the opposition.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.