• 1

    posted a message on Game of Thrones is disappointing
    Quote from ShadowsOfSense >>

     

    • Bran, Boy Blunder: I don't remember seeing any of you guys complaining about this specifically, so I wanted your thoughts on it - were any of you actually expecting Bran to do... anything? I've seen a fair few people complain that he just sat in his chair and didn't help out in the battle at all, like they expected him to suddenly Gandalf it up or something. Dude's got no legs and has displayed no magical capabilities beyond warging and looking stuff up on the GoT wiki, he was meant to be bait and he played that role admirably.

     

    When Bran said to Theon " I'<wbr />m going to go now" and then did his warg thing with ravens, I thought for sure he's going for some help. Maybe some unexpected reinforcements, like wild animals coming from the woods and attacking those WW that stayed in the back. But no, he simply wanted to check out on his boy NK, that's all.

     

    Posted in: General Chat
  • 1

    posted a message on Game of Thrones is disappointing
    Quote from jainaishot >>
     Which is exactly why they had to maximise their chances and force the night king to arrive. Yet they derped. And do not forget that they should have to preserved their forces as much as they could so not only they dont join the dead but fight cercei with the leftovers. The more dire the situation, the cunnier and smarter you have to get. Honestly the writers f*cked this up big time.

    As for arya, is not a matter of preference, but a matter of build up. George has given so many hints about jon through out the books. Liking or not liking the fact that he is depicted as the chosen one is one thing. But completely forgo the established storyline is a major flaw in storytelling. If they have left more open or giving some hints about arya as well, making her a candidate for azor ahai like danerys then it would be ok. But this?They made huge plot threads obsolete.

     

    I didn't read the books (I will at some point) so I don't know how plot goes there and I can uderstand your dissapointment if things in the show did not end up as books were suggesting they would, but both David and Dan have said on multiple occasions that show and books will have their differences in story. 

    I agree that many things could've been done differently. There was a huge build up for this battle and it ended way too fast. There should've been at least one more episode of it. Like i said before, I think that NK died way too easy. I was hoping that it will require some divine intervention too kill him. Perhaps the Old Gods could've helped somehow, or maybe Lord of Light should've acted through Melisandre and bring him down with his power. Yet he died from a simple dagger stab.

    Also, episode two felt like a farewell to many characters, yet only few of 'em died. Too few for such a hopeless situation they were in. But, there's more story to be told, so let's wait and see what happens.

     

     

    Posted in: General Chat
  • 5

    posted a message on HCT World Championship 2019 Survival Guide

    Dunno if it's posted somewhere already, but there are pack rewards for log in into game every day of championship. Today it was one Witchwood pack, tomorrow will be one Boomsday pack, and the next day will probably be one Rastakhan pack.

    Make sure you start Hearthstone every day because if you miss a day, you lose that day's pack for good.

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Should Dr. Boom Mad Genius get Hofed?
    Quote from EternalHS >>

    Warrior has been dead for over a year

    Finally becomes good

    Bads: MUST NERF IT REEEEE

    You're absolutely right! Haven't seen single Control Warrior, Quest Warrior, Dragon Warrior + Odd versions of each, Rush Warrior, Mecha'thun Warrior + some meme Warrior decks on ladder for more than a year! I missed him sooo much!

    Dr. Boom was strong before the rotation, now it's OP. And it's fine because DK Garrosh wasn't much of a Hero card and warrior deserves to have one that's strong.

    More annoying thing for me is Omega Devastator. Thanks to Omega Assembly I see at least three of these buggers per match. Just recently had a match against Warrior who played 5 (FIVE!) of 'em. Fun times...

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on [RoS] Khadgar Mage {V2.1}

    with this deck you lose to rogue, you lose to bomb warrior, and you get crushed by token druid - and that's about 90% meta atm

    early game minions are weak, it lacks strong heals and it's main source of power (summons) are rng dependant

    +1 for the effort, but this deck is not for ladder

    Posted in: [RoS] Khadgar Mage {V2.1}
  • 1

    posted a message on New Card - Madame Lazul

    It's a bad card that can be useful in a few situations. Tier 4 at best.

     

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on The HCT Winter Championship Survival Guide - (Feb 28 - Mar 3)

    It's 3 packs actually.

    This is how it works:

    You get one pack just for choosing someone. If your choice moves out of the group stage, second pack is yours. If he wins his next match (as Bunnyhoppor did), then you get three packs. And if your champion gets to finals, it's time to open a bottle of champagne, 'cause you're rich, son!

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on Year of the Dragon - Goodbye Genn & Baku, New Solo Content, Arena Draft Pools, Smarter Deck Builder
    Quote from theremon >>

    I think you don't get how the Hall of Fame works.

    All cards moving to HoF will give you dust but you keep the cards. They follow the same pattern, so why remove them completely?

    I don't think you get that my post isn't about dust, rather about the consistency of cards that are put into HoF.

    So far, cards that are moved to HoF were, as developers said, either omnipresent/overused or were "limiting future design options" if they stayed in standard. Fine. This time, apart from Genn/Baku and three classic cards that indeed could be/are material for HoF, we have four cards that are total opposite - they're neither overused, nor they are limiting design space.

    Now, if these cards were really good, then it would make sense to keep them, but, apart from Murkspark Eel which is decent, other three are medicore/bad and are only in HoF because, without Genn/Baku in standard, they'd be completely pointless. So why keep these bad cards in HoF alongside other powerful cards? Just so we can have more cards in the game? Nonsense.

    Quote from Bluelights >>

    People will get dust from them when they move to the HoF.

     

     I don't care about dust, I was talking about something else.

    or they can just leave them as is and we still get the dust anyways

     Really people? Dust is the only thing you care about? 

    Posted in: News
  • -4

    posted a message on Year of the Dragon - Goodbye Genn & Baku, New Solo Content, Arena Draft Pools, Smarter Deck Builder

    While Baku/Genn & Classic cards make sense, rest of the cards imho don't belong to HoF. Strongest even/odd decks (especially in the wild) won't even use any of 'em. I mean, who would want to play Gloom Stag ever?

    And since, obviously, developers aren't planning to print any more cards like this, they will stand there like a weird anomaly.

    They should have removed them completely and give players dust for 'em.

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on Hearthstone Nerfs Coming February 5 - Equality, Cold Blood, Hunter's Mark & More

    I think changing it's cost from 6 to 9 (or 10 if it's more suitable for some possible unknown even/odd shenanigans) would help quite a bit, without hurting much it's power level.

    Posted in: News
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.