Am I the only one completely missing the point of shaman's standard list? I mean, mischief maker for what? Swapping your nice big card with a whopping 0-mana tour guide, voracious reader or intrepid initiate?!? Because we all know it's all this awesome meta has to offer, right?!?
Then bombs, allbatross would be useless and rogue could scheme 100 zeps in their deck
It should ADD the requirement. No duplicate in the deck AND no duplicates at the start of the game. And it should apply to DQ as well. Nothing infuriates me more than a braindead Galakrond warlock vomiting cards out each turn and then unleashing those at the very end.
People are currently not playing DH a lot because it basically got many crappy cards (much deservedly so) and everybody realised the new ones are way worse than the already existing ones. Thus, there's not much excitement in playing the same old deck or running a far worse version of it. I have a feeling though that once the dust of "let's have fun and try new things!" settles we'll be back to tempo DH and huntards in no time. And the only additions to tempo DH list will probably be Kreen and one copy of Glide.
8 legendaries (1 golden) and 23 epics out of 85 packs. Pretty lucky. Even though had a bad start by having willow as the first legendary (maybe the memiest of them all imo).
Also must say the golden packs disappointed hard (not a single epic). But I don't complain. Was looking for Vectus and actually got it, so that's really fine!
Jokes aside I really hope they print some more support in the form of some negative battlecry beasts (à la Injured Blade master) for druid/hunter, otherwise this card will be completely unplayable.
I think that the problem the players are having with this card is the fact that it's a DH card. The community is simply fed up with that class and the way it monopolized constructed in the past 4 months. And was therefore understandably concerned about giving it a tool that can potentially singlehandedly destroy entire game plans.
Maybe I'm missing something. But for me not wanting a card as your next draw is one thing, sending it at the bottom of your deck is another. I get the utility in some decks but it doesn't seem to me as the card you'd put in every deck.
Must feel bad when you first get notified by Blizzard you've been selected for a card reveal... But then realize your card is one of the major pack fillers of the expansion...
Funny how, normally, the video showcases the best case scenario. This time around it summoned a flame imp and a scrap imp!!! Like, the community will inevitably get super hyped about this card now!
2
Am I the only one completely missing the point of shaman's standard list? I mean, mischief maker for what? Swapping your nice big card with a whopping 0-mana tour guide, voracious reader or intrepid initiate?!? Because we all know it's all this awesome meta has to offer, right?!?
0
And as a gala Priest do you seriously believe anybody might feel sorry for you???
0
It should ADD the requirement. No duplicate in the deck AND no duplicates at the start of the game. And it should apply to DQ as well. Nothing infuriates me more than a braindead Galakrond warlock vomiting cards out each turn and then unleashing those at the very end.
0
People are currently not playing DH a lot because it basically got many crappy cards (much deservedly so) and everybody realised the new ones are way worse than the already existing ones. Thus, there's not much excitement in playing the same old deck or running a far worse version of it. I have a feeling though that once the dust of "let's have fun and try new things!" settles we'll be back to tempo DH and huntards in no time. And the only additions to tempo DH list will probably be Kreen and one copy of Glide.
1
Well, I guess you even out all by yourself the unlucky pack openers of the whole world. Good for you man. 😉
0
8 legendaries (1 golden) and 23 epics out of 85 packs. Pretty lucky. Even though had a bad start by having willow as the first legendary (maybe the memiest of them all imo).
Also must say the golden packs disappointed hard (not a single epic). But I don't complain. Was looking for Vectus and actually got it, so that's really fine!
0
Dread raven meta incoming!
Jokes aside I really hope they print some more support in the form of some negative battlecry beasts (à la Injured Blade master) for druid/hunter, otherwise this card will be completely unplayable.
7
Yeah. And I'll always be drawing it on turn 6.
0
I think that the problem the players are having with this card is the fact that it's a DH card. The community is simply fed up with that class and the way it monopolized constructed in the past 4 months. And was therefore understandably concerned about giving it a tool that can potentially singlehandedly destroy entire game plans.
0
Maybe I'm missing something. But for me not wanting a card as your next draw is one thing, sending it at the bottom of your deck is another. I get the utility in some decks but it doesn't seem to me as the card you'd put in every deck.
-7
Must feel bad when you first get notified by Blizzard you've been selected for a card reveal... But then realize your card is one of the major pack fillers of the expansion...
2
Funny how, normally, the video showcases the best case scenario. This time around it summoned a flame imp and a scrap imp!!! Like, the community will inevitably get super hyped about this card now!
0
Was just wondering... do buffed or mana discounted cards keep their buffs and discounts when shuffled back in the deck?
1
This into shadow word ruin will lead to many many rage-quitting...
1
Wow. 600. .Congrats May your braincells rest in peace.