• 1

    posted a message on So, How is the new expansion for you?

    I understand the design decision to make it similar to stuff we know, given that it's the 5 year anniversary and all. But I completely agree with OP, emotionally my response is really flat. I've been whaling pretty hard and always bought for 100$+ for every expansion but I think this'll be the last one for me; I've been playing more MTGA than HS since the expansion, and even though the last expansion there was in January I still feel like there's more decks I haven't tried than ones in this expansion. The legendaries just don't jog my imagination, I can't see something fun and left field come out of it.

    Meanwhile in MTG I still have to try stuff with Ill-Gotten Inheritance, Biogenic Ooze, or Theater of Horrors.
    and not only that I have loads of older mythics I wanna try with new cards, since even stuff like Revel in Riches got new support with things like Smothering Tithe even though it was released a year prior. Plus 100$ will get me almost a full playset in MTG after dailies, whereas it's not nearly enough in HS.

    For HS to win me back they'd have to either be comfortable with more complex cards (such as Finale of Promise) or cards that jog your imagination (such as Role Reversal). As it is right now in HS I feel like everyone just looks at stuff like Waggle Pick and thinks "ah, Leeroy".

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on How can a new player get wild mode?
    Quote from kitox_me >>
    Quote from Rachel2206 >>

    You can craft wild cards after Rotation because you have to own wild cards before you can craft them

     this statement is completely false, stop spreading ignorance wtf is wrong with you?

     It's right, it's just a little lazily written. You can only craft wild cards after you own *A* wild card. And she is then also suggesting he can wait until rotation so that the cards he owns will then become wild, which is pretty heads up considering it's in 8 days. The alternative is to buy a pack or hope the next brawl includes wild cards.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Is it just me or does 'Shadows' look half-cocked?

    It's the 5 year anniversary expansion, that's why it's retreading a lot of familiar land.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on What has been your favourite expansion thus far?

    I like how Goblins vs Gnomes was noones favorite. Then it came back as Boomsday Project and it was still noones favorite.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Disenchanting all new WILD cards
    Quote from Pullaaa >>

    WILD IS CHEAPER TO PLAY DONT DO IT. standard will be suuper expensive in the long run unlike wild

    I just want to emphasize this point:
    It takes a while to get a wild collection going, but if you - as is the case with the OP - have a rather extensive collection, wild is cheaper to maintain because fewer cards each set impact the wild meta.

    Personally I also find the wild meta much more diverse than standard and so enjoy it a lot more, but that doesn't seem to be everyone's sentiment, but I would suggest giving it a try yourself.

    PS: If you do end up deciding to disenchant anyway, remember to wait with disenchanting the Hall of Fame rotations till you've gotten the dust refund.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 1

    posted a message on Good game emote at end of game = bad manner?
    Quote from Sherman1986 >>

    Why is being nice while playing Hearthstone so important for so many people? I use to spam emotes all the time and I don't care if some strangers I would probably never interact again like me or not. I really don't understand you...

     Because it's not only about yourself. Some of us like to contribute to everyone having a good time :)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on So Roger won the Winter Championship...

    To be fair, it was Roger's teammate, Shaxy, who said they didn't have MC Tech and Roger literally asked how he knew. 
    The curious thing is that none of them must have realized they cheated cause they themselves uploaded the video with their team com audio track. They should have obviously known, and disqualifying them then was the right thing to do, but if Roger didn't even know about it until he literally got the information there's not really much he can do, and I have a hard time seeing why he shouldn't be able to compete on his own.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on I do not like Tracking - Change my mind!
    Quote from LessThan3
     
    IF Tracking's text was something like "Pick three cards from your deck....." as iandakar elaborated, then Tracking would be a no-brainer. But because it's the top three, the value of the card is essentially "does one card now at the expense of two others provide me with more value than all three cards over the subsequent three turns" - and that is purely situational.
    Assuming you meant to say "Pick one of three random cards from your deck", can you elaborate on why you think this to be true?

    I'll clue you in that some of the strong responses here probably come from MtG players, since it's been widely accepted, for probably over a decade, that there's no difference between the top or the bottom of the deck, as long as noone has any information about cards in the deck (ie. It matters if you definitively know an important card is at the bottom of the deck in this match, because it should affect your playstyle). This doesn't necessarily mean that you're wrong, but I'm trying to wrap my head around why I would care about the cards being burned off the top or randomly.

    As far as I can tell from the quoted paragraph, you're worrying about burning cards in a specific instance where it may or may not turn out that cards drawn anyway may have mattered on their own (moreso than the next 2 drawn cards, which is now 2 further into a pile you have no information of). As a sidenote, it's important to remember we would not have been 1 card deeper into these 3 cards in the absence of Tracking, merely with another card that, presumably, does not interact with the next 3 cards in the deck.

    At the same time you mentioned earlier that...
    "You've got an equal chance of thinning out the deck in favour of your situation, and thinning out the deck in a detrimental way. Sure if the deck is weighted more to the early or late game you have a higher probability of thinning out to that part of the curve, but overall statistically there should be no net benefit to thinning the deck as all cards are random."
    Which leads me back to the notion that over the course of many games, the cards burned have no inherently favorable or detrimental outcomes, no matter where they came from in the deck. However! They share the common traits that (1) you decided which were burned, and (2) that they were, in fact, burned and cannot be drawn in this game.  This is a degree of information which these cards will never provide you simply residing in the deck. 


    Edit: I have no clue how to format quotes on this site. RIP.

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on A little more complexity and no more powercreep please?

    Im wondering if complexity only comes with more text though. For MTG the text is often longer because of qualifiers and also because people needed to know what it did before online gaming was a thing. To a certain extent what they did with that 1/1 steed that replicated on death I never see anymore seemed like a dumbing down, cause noone was topping leaderboards with those builds anyway. You could easily make something phasic like "Over the next 3 turns..." Or cards that interact more with the opponent but they are obviously reluctant to do so. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Activision-Blizzard has gone too far with the Mega Bundle

    One thing that confuses me here is that it seems to be the argument that because the hero is (presumably) highly coveted, it should be cheap. That's not how our current market works. I'm sure everyone here would like a GTX 1080 ti graphics card, but that certainly doesn't mean Nvidia should be selling them cheaply.

    God knows there are plenty of criticisms to direct at international and most national economic principles and policies but I don't think we're gonna solve that by asking Blizzard to make it easier to get popular things, probably quite the opposite.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.