the ones I face always go face (heh), and make very few trades. That's the total opposite of how I play it, as I play it more of a control deck. To be fair though, playing it as control hasn't really gained me a good win rate with it.
So, what kind of deck is it? Is it supposed to play aggro, always go face, like the ones I've went against?
i hate any braindead decks, these type of decks doesnt define a good player, even my young brother could do well with it since the goal is drop minion and go face.
if you are an aggro player and want to defend this style dont waste your time doing so, im sure 100% this type of decks any ******** could do a good job playing with.
I've been playing it the last two days just to see what the fuss was all about. I think it's legitimate and is probably going to play a good roll in the rest of the meta. (We'll see once it's more of a known deck, of course. Right now, I'm not sure people know what to expect.)
There are good anti-aggro tools (Pyro, Consecration, Equality, Spikeridge Steed, Kangor/Heal). Although I still get run over by Zoo more than I'd like.
Val'anyr gives you game against control (it's basically an auto-keep IMO).
It has reasonable burst in Corpsetaker/Windfury, Blessing of Kings, and Dinosize (if you're into that...I am).
It can run the good tech options if it needs to (Geist, Horror)
All things considered, is it better than Even Warlock? I'm not sure. But there's something there, and I think it should continue to be explored and refined. I certainly find it more satisfying to play than Even Shaman.
That's the list I've been playing with the following changes: - Sea Giant + Dinozise - Avenging Wrath + Hydrologist (I feel like 7 two drops was not enough)
There are also versions running Mountain Giants and Dry Gulch Jailers. I'm haven't tried those.
That honestly can apply to a whole breadth of cards in wild. Are we to turn wild into a pseudo-eternal format that constantly nerfs previously non-troublesome or less troublesome cards because the design team wants to push power creep cards, such as a melon that has more draw potential than Nourish for one less mana?
I don't believe in nerfing old cards to enable poor design decisions, decisions that will probably get nerfed anyway once Melon starts causing problems in standard in the future (thus rendering the Aviana nerf meaningless).
It isn't a poor design decision though because only standard matters. Blizzard made a mistake by trying to balance Wild. It's an eternal format, not a balanced one. The two cannot coexist.
0
Yes.
28
That hunter is not a "recruit" hunter. lol.
1 card has the recruit keyword.
Comparatively, 11 cards have the "deathrattle" keyword.
It is a deathrattle hunter, dummies.
1
LOL yes? Do you think you get to be the special one playing with unnerfed cards? That's some bullshit.
0
It may be the weakest of the control decks, but it's still totally viable. It has the best AOE's.
1
no it isn't? lol
2
I have nightmares about wild growth, coin, nourish.
0
This is a good Brawl.
0
Zilliax is pretty important. Some lists have cut lyra.
0
lul
0
Where have you been, man?
0
I've been playing it the last two days just to see what the fuss was all about. I think it's legitimate and is probably going to play a good roll in the rest of the meta. (We'll see once it's more of a known deck, of course. Right now, I'm not sure people know what to expect.)
There are good anti-aggro tools (Pyro, Consecration, Equality, Spikeridge Steed, Kangor/Heal). Although I still get run over by Zoo more than I'd like.
Val'anyr gives you game against control (it's basically an auto-keep IMO).
It has reasonable burst in Corpsetaker/Windfury, Blessing of Kings, and Dinosize (if you're into that...I am).
It can run the good tech options if it needs to (Geist, Horror)
All things considered, is it better than Even Warlock? I'm not sure. But there's something there, and I think it should continue to be explored and refined. I certainly find it more satisfying to play than Even Shaman.
https://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/decks/gundamflames-legend-even-paladin-october-2018/
That's the list I've been playing with the following changes:
- Sea Giant
+ Dinozise
- Avenging Wrath
+ Hydrologist (I feel like 7 two drops was not enough)
There are also versions running Mountain Giants and Dry Gulch Jailers. I'm haven't tried those.
0
MCT
0
You could probably pretty reasonably fit Corpsetaker in this.
1
It isn't a poor design decision though because only standard matters. Blizzard made a mistake by trying to balance Wild. It's an eternal format, not a balanced one. The two cannot coexist.
3