• 1

    posted a message on Would it be smart to save Mage Packs?
    Quote from user-31021151 >>

    The smartest thing to do would be to not fall for this scam at all.

    Which part of it is a scam? The part where you decide for yourself if you want to purchase it, and you receive exactly what you purchase?

    If you don't think it's worth the price (which is a completely reasonable feeling), then don't buy it. But it isn't a scam.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What Decks Can Win Diamond Level

    Face Hunter

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Book of heroes IS NOT A SOLO ADVENTURE! IT'S TERRIBLE!
    Quote from Legitbrit316 >>

    Yes it's free but fucking hell a solo adventure is like nax, blackrock, the ashes adventure. This is a dungeon run AND THEY ARE SHIT! If this is the direction of solo content then that's not good! After a failure, you start from the beginning and have to go through 8 gruelling fights all over again! What's the point?! Where's the fun?!

    Why blizzard?

     I'm sorry, little buddy.

    Let's get you home and buy you an ice cream. Will that make you feel better, pal? An ice cream?

    When can my baby have ice cream? - BabyCenter India

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on The 5 most played cards in Standard and Wild right now - this is how I would nerf them!

    Funnier the first time you did it last week.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Bigglesworth issue since patch?
    Quote from eleyoh >>

    I've not noticed it yet. 

    I do know some people sell their entire team before conceding, just to mess with Bigglesworth (and to much lesser extent, Rafaam)

     

     That's probably what happened. Thanks

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on Bigglesworth issue since patch?

    I've only played him once, but when people died, I did not get offered a minion from their battle party. Anyone else experience this?

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 1

    posted a message on Archmage Williow nerf? No dust refund?

    I don't know why this is so hard for some people.

    They gave her Oakheart stats, but she costs 1 mana less.
    The only issue with Willow is card pool.
    Once the cardpool is Willow friendly, she will also be as good as Oakheart was.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 25

    posted a message on Archmage Williow nerf? No dust refund?
    Quote from aposteljoe >>

    4yi: I'm posting this, but I even don't own this card.

     The absolute epitome of a person who just wants to complain for the sake of complaining.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on golden mccaw triggers 2 minions

    That's how Golden Macaw works. It may make more sense to read it as:

    After this attacks, trigger a random friendly minion's Deathrattle. This effect happens twice.

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 2

    posted a message on I hate how mage has become the casino class

    This has been the class identity for yeeeears.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Too much burn = Warlock is unplayable
    Quote from Geoff >>

    You just ignored every single argument and try defending your silly statement not using any evidence. Just stop. If you believe so strongly that the Gala Lock is so good, then good for you. But it's merely your unsupported opinion - fine - all evidence proves you wrong. You have right to have your opinion, but don't claim it is a supported statement, because you are just making yourself look silly. Especially if you get the evidence brought up to you clearly and you just decide to ignore it.

    How is representation relevant to how strong a deck is?

     

    Posted in: Warlock
  • 0

    posted a message on Too much burn = Warlock is unplayable
    Quote from OoZuNoO >>

     You bring up the VS report and then disregard what it says when it doesnt support your argument? Funny.

    Representation isn't the same thing as power level. But good try at changing the conversation.

    Posted in: Warlock
  • 0

    posted a message on Too much burn = Warlock is unplayable
    Quote from OoZuNoO >>

     That report clearly shows Warlock has the worst representation across all ranks, even worse than Shaman, how about we DON'T ignore that?..

    The reason is simple, the class became redundant: If I wanted to play aggro with demons, id play aggro DH, which doesnt roll over and die when it loses the board unlike zoolock. If I wanted to play a control deck that wins every control matchup but loses to aggro, id play Priest, never control lock. 

    This situation is not a one expansion only deal, the addition of DH and the Priest rework just straight up made Warlock irrelevant, thats what I want to cast some light on here.

     

     Representation is meaningless...

    Posted in: Warlock
  • 0

    posted a message on Too much burn = Warlock is unplayable
    Quote from Geoff >>

     Not like I support the claim that lock as a whole is shit now, but I wonder, where does your conclusion come from? Because no data seems to support this really. Gala Lock is one of many playable archetypes. But to call it "one of the best" you'd require some evidence in numbers.

     Vs report 170.

    Posted in: Warlock
  • 0

    posted a message on Too much burn = Warlock is unplayable

    Galakrond Warlock is one of the best decks in the format...but let's ignore that.

    Posted in: Warlock
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.