Yes it's free but fucking hell a solo adventure is like nax, blackrock, the ashes adventure. This is a dungeon run AND THEY ARE SHIT! If this is the direction of solo content then that's not good! After a failure, you start from the beginning and have to go through 8 gruelling fights all over again! What's the point?! Where's the fun?!
Why blizzard?
I'm sorry, little buddy.
Let's get you home and buy you an ice cream. Will that make you feel better, pal? An ice cream?
They gave her Oakheart stats, but she costs 1 mana less. The only issue with Willow is card pool. Once the cardpool is Willow friendly, she will also be as good as Oakheart was.
You just ignored every single argument and try defending your silly statement not using any evidence. Just stop. If you believe so strongly that the Gala Lock is so good, then good for you. But it's merely your unsupported opinion - fine - all evidence proves you wrong. You have right to have your opinion, but don't claim it is a supported statement, because you are just making yourself look silly. Especially if you get the evidence brought up to you clearly and you just decide to ignore it.
How is representation relevant to how strong a deck is?
That report clearly shows Warlock has the worst representation across all ranks, even worse than Shaman, how about we DON'T ignore that?..
The reason is simple, the class became redundant: If I wanted to play aggro with demons, id play aggro DH, which doesnt roll over and die when it loses the board unlike zoolock. If I wanted to play a control deck that wins every control matchup but loses to aggro, id play Priest, never control lock.
This situation is not a one expansion only deal, the addition of DH and the Priest rework just straight up made Warlock irrelevant, thats what I want to cast some light on here.
Not like I support the claim that lock as a whole is shit now, but I wonder, where does your conclusion come from? Because no data seems to support this really. Gala Lock is one of many playable archetypes. But to call it "one of the best" you'd require some evidence in numbers.
1
Which part of it is a scam? The part where you decide for yourself if you want to purchase it, and you receive exactly what you purchase?
If you don't think it's worth the price (which is a completely reasonable feeling), then don't buy it. But it isn't a scam.
0
Face Hunter
1
I'm sorry, little buddy.
Let's get you home and buy you an ice cream. Will that make you feel better, pal? An ice cream?
1
Funnier the first time you did it last week.
0
That's probably what happened. Thanks
0
I've only played him once, but when people died, I did not get offered a minion from their battle party. Anyone else experience this?
1
I don't know why this is so hard for some people.
They gave her Oakheart stats, but she costs 1 mana less.
The only issue with Willow is card pool.
Once the cardpool is Willow friendly, she will also be as good as Oakheart was.
25
The absolute epitome of a person who just wants to complain for the sake of complaining.
0
That's how Golden Macaw works. It may make more sense to read it as:
After this attacks, trigger a random friendly minion's Deathrattle. This effect happens twice.
2
This has been the class identity for yeeeears.
0
How is representation relevant to how strong a deck is?
0
Representation isn't the same thing as power level. But good try at changing the conversation.
0
Representation is meaningless...
0
Vs report 170.
0
Galakrond Warlock is one of the best decks in the format...but let's ignore that.