Clearly didn't even watch Ben Brodes vid to the end where he discussed the nerf. He mentioned that Warsong was changes for MORE than just because of Patron Warrior. He talks about how it limited what kinds of cards they could make. For example, Dreadsteed was originally planned to be in Curse of Naxxramas and was going to be a neutral card. Unfortunately, that couldn't happen because Warsong Commander existed. Do your research before making a statement like this.
Also so much for that signature: 'Don't complain, use your brain'
What statement am I making exactly? This whole post is solely for comedic purposes. I realize that they probably had some good reasons for nerfing Warsong as they did, but seriously, you as a card creator realize how badly Warsong is now right? They could have easily added one more stat or decreased it by one more mana. Yes it needed a change. No it did not need to be unplayable. Seriously, most of your cards are better than anything Bliz came up with in TGT.
Clearly didn't even watch Ben Brodes vid to the end where he discussed the nerf. He mentioned that Warsong was changes for MORE than just because of Patron Warrior. He talks about how it limited what kinds of cards they could make. For example, Dreadsteed was originally planned to be in Curse of Naxxramas and was going to be a neutral card. Unfortunately, that couldn't happen because Warsong Commander existed. Do your research before making a statement like this.
Also so much for that signature: 'Don't complain, use your brain'
I laughed at the irony when I saw his signature as well. Good fun!
You are beyond stupid if you honestly think that the Warsong nerf was justified. Like OP stated, it is clear that you wanted the deck to die so yours would be better. Now, the card in my avatar is better than Warsong...
Clearly didn't even watch Ben Brodes vid to the end where he discussed the nerf. He mentioned that Warsong was changes for MORE than just because of Patron Warrior. He talks about how it limited what kinds of cards they could make. For example, Dreadsteed was originally planned to be in Curse of Naxxramas and was going to be a neutral card. Unfortunately, that couldn't happen because Warsong Commander existed. Do your research before making a statement like this.
Also so much for that signature: 'Don't complain, use your brain'
What statement am I making exactly? This whole post is solely for comedic purposes. I realize that they probably had some good reasons for nerfing Warsong as they did, but seriously, you as a card creator realize how badly Warsong is now right? They could have easily added one more stat or decreased it by one more mana. Yes it needed a change. No it did not need to be unplayable. Seriously, most of your cards are better than anything Bliz came up with in TGT.
Yeah it's pretty obvious its bad now. I probably would have made it a 2/4 or 3/3 (even though it still wouldn't see play competitively but would have been cool for some new players to try some stuff out with) but you were suggesting keeping it's ability to give things charge which wouldn't have fixed what they were going for.
Sorry I didn't realize it was comedic. How am I supposed to understand human emotions without Twitch Emotes?
I have spent exactly $384.49 on this game. I now realize I was stupider than the average hunter player
Warrior: The Rich mans class. Only 1 playable archetype that requires you to sell your soul in order to have enough dust to play it.
you have spent alot... it should be enough for control warrior, isn't it?
Honestly, it's not if you want to play any other deck too. I've probably spent around 200 dollars, and I'm still missing the most expensive pieces of Control Warrior. I could disenchant most of my cards to make Control Warrior, but why would I do something that stupid?
the most important part of what OP said is his signature " don't complain, use your brain" which is not what the OP do.
Good balances to warsong that I thought of in 30 seconds: 3 mana 4/3 with same text. 2 mana 2/3 with same text. 3 mana 2/3 give charge minions +3 attack. I literally have never hit legend and I'm a better card designer than Ben Brode himself.
balancing / fixing grim patron deck is to nerf it... you should suggest a nerf, not a buff... so no, you are not a good game designer. should think more than 30 seconds... 30 days maybe not enough unfortunately...
Blizzard says they are going to closely watch how the meta game changes after the nerf; what they really mean is that they are going to masturbate to skilled players' tears while rolling in money.
please explain skilled player. you said yourself you never hit legendary rank. and i do believe the other skilled players will not cry, in fact will be happy with the extinction of grim patron warriors.
by all means, i'm not a skilled player. but i can play patron warriors and winning most of the games. the deck is easy and doesn't require skill.
I have spent exactly $384.49 on this game. I now realize I was stupider than the average hunter player
Warrior: The Rich mans class. Only 1 playable archetype that requires you to sell your soul in order to have enough dust to play it.
you have spent alot... it should be enough for control warrior, isn't it?
If you have any more honesty to dish out feel free to comment it. I have completely lost faith in Blizzard's ability pilot HS and will probably stop paying them any money until they get their shit together. R.I.P Ben Brody
yes, stop paying. start playing... better
He didn't suggest a buff, by same text he meant "give charge minions +1 attack". and his suggestion was fair and honestly would make Warsong playable in certain formats without breeding a SMOrc warrior.
Clearly didn't even watch Ben Brodes vid to the end where he discussed the nerf. He mentioned that Warsong was changes for MORE than just because of Patron Warrior. He talks about how it limited what kinds of cards they could make. For example, Dreadsteed was originally planned to be in Curse of Naxxramas and was going to be a neutral card. Unfortunately, that couldn't happen because Warsong Commander existed. Do your research before making a statement like this.
Also so much for that signature: 'Don't complain, use your brain'
What statement am I making exactly? This whole post is solely for comedic purposes. I realize that they probably had some good reasons for nerfing Warsong as they did, but seriously, you as a card creator realize how badly Warsong is now right? They could have easily added one more stat or decreased it by one more mana. Yes it needed a change. No it did not need to be unplayable. Seriously, most of your cards are better than anything Bliz came up with in TGT.
Yeah it's pretty obvious its bad now. I probably would have made it a 2/4 or 3/3 (even though it still wouldn't see play competitively but would have been cool for some new players to try some stuff out with) but you were suggesting keeping it's ability to give things charge which wouldn't have fixed what they were going for.
Sorry I didn't realize it was comedic. How am I supposed to understand human emotions without Twitch Emotes?
Oh my bad. What I meant when I stated my ideas was to keep the nerfed text and just improve the stats. I've edited it out now. I know how you feel; that's one of the worst problems on the internet. I really should have been more clear because now that I re-read it I realize that it does sound more like a rant. I guess I need to watch more South Park.
You know, one of the interesting things about Hearthstone is that, despite being entirely digital and involving no trading between players, it actually takes way longer for problem cards to be nerfed than it takes for problem cards in physical games to be restricted or banned. You'd think it'd happen much more quickly than that. I might go as far as saying that the hands-off approach to the meta is strange.
The whole Undertaker situation had an appalling timeframe. Not sure why they thought that'd sort itself out.
Uh the whiners are the one who screamed for the nerf. Who are also too stupid to realize it isn't even about patron being nerfed, but how they changed warsong to the digital equivalent of a paperweight.
In their next expansion they should include card for all classes "6/2 Charge, Destroy Enemy Armor", then hearthstone would actually become a good game.
In their next expansion they should include card for all classes "6/2 Charge, Destroy Enemy Armor", then hearthstone would actually become a good game.
I sense a hunter among us.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I returned to this game much like how a recovering alcoholic can relapse.
In their next expansion they should include card for all classes "6/2 Charge, Destroy Enemy Armor", then hearthstone would actually become a good game.
Ok, but only if it has Overload to make sure that it's terrible.
Whatever, there should not be OTK moves in the game, and if they not involve owning the fucking board but instead can be performed without board presence, then you all should have been shouting 'NERF THIS SHIT PLEASE' at Blizzard's offices every day of the fucking week.
Face hunters melts against my almighty Dragon Priest. So do the new secret pallys, I'll wellcome the new metagame, More aggro? That's not a knive, THIS IS A KNIVE.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
What statement am I making exactly? This whole post is solely for comedic purposes. I realize that they probably had some good reasons for nerfing Warsong as they did, but seriously, you as a card creator realize how badly Warsong is now right? They could have easily added one more stat or decreased it by one more mana. Yes it needed a change. No it did not need to be unplayable. Seriously, most of your cards are better than anything Bliz came up with in TGT.
Don't Complain, Use Your Brain!
Honestly, this may be a joke, but it's one hundred percent correct.
Been playing Hearthstone since March 2015. Avid theory crafter and card conceptualizer.
"Scrolls"
That game is dead though. But hey it was a nice point anyways.
You are beyond stupid if you honestly think that the Warsong nerf was justified. Like OP stated, it is clear that you wanted the deck to die so yours would be better. Now, the card in my avatar is better than Warsong...
Han Solo dies
Yeah it's pretty obvious its bad now. I probably would have made it a 2/4 or 3/3 (even though it still wouldn't see play competitively but would have been cool for some new players to try some stuff out with) but you were suggesting keeping it's ability to give things charge which wouldn't have fixed what they were going for.
Sorry I didn't realize it was comedic. How am I supposed to understand human emotions without Twitch Emotes?
Honestly, it's not if you want to play any other deck too. I've probably spent around 200 dollars, and I'm still missing the most expensive pieces of Control Warrior. I could disenchant most of my cards to make Control Warrior, but why would I do something that stupid?
He didn't suggest a buff, by same text he meant "give charge minions +1 attack". and his suggestion was fair and honestly would make Warsong playable in certain formats without breeding a SMOrc warrior.
Han Solo dies
Oh my bad. What I meant when I stated my ideas was to keep the nerfed text and just improve the stats. I've edited it out now. I know how you feel; that's one of the worst problems on the internet. I really should have been more clear because now that I re-read it I realize that it does sound more like a rant. I guess I need to watch more South Park.
Don't Complain, Use Your Brain!
Uh who are you?
You now realize Ben Brode is a Bullshitter?
He's been a lying bastard ever since he knows how to talk, and laughs when he isn't.
If everyone start a thread to state their opinion about the nerf, we might as well ask those black magic guys to spam the forums.
There is a thread about the nerf, post your opinions there instead of clogging up the forums.
Seriously, the whole page is "what i think about the nerf", "my opinion about the nerf", "why the nerf is bad", etc. Stop spamming FFS.
"Put your face in the light!" - Tirion Fordring
Or the text should read "Battlecry: Give a minion charge."
That will fix the programming issue and fix the problem.
Welcome to my Youtube Channel!
You know, one of the interesting things about Hearthstone is that, despite being entirely digital and involving no trading between players, it actually takes way longer for problem cards to be nerfed than it takes for problem cards in physical games to be restricted or banned. You'd think it'd happen much more quickly than that. I might go as far as saying that the hands-off approach to the meta is strange.
The whole Undertaker situation had an appalling timeframe. Not sure why they thought that'd sort itself out.
So? Face/aggro/cancer decks can be countered OTK with no presence can't
Why can't you whiners understand?
Uh the whiners are the one who screamed for the nerf. Who are also too stupid to realize it isn't even about patron being nerfed, but how they changed warsong to the digital equivalent of a paperweight.
In their next expansion they should include card for all classes "6/2 Charge, Destroy Enemy Armor", then hearthstone would actually become a good game.
I sense a hunter among us.
I returned to this game much like how a recovering alcoholic can relapse.
Ok, but only if it has Overload to make sure that it's terrible.
Make the Card: The biggest thread on the site!
My mandibles which are capable of pressing down and tearing, my talons which are known to intercept and hold.
without overload
Whatever, there should not be OTK moves in the game, and if they not involve owning the fucking board but instead can be performed without board presence, then you all should have been shouting 'NERF THIS SHIT PLEASE' at Blizzard's offices every day of the fucking week.
Face hunters melts against my almighty Dragon Priest. So do the new secret pallys, I'll wellcome the new metagame, More aggro? That's not a knive, THIS IS A KNIVE.