1. Priest - I hate facing Priests. It's not that they are that much better. I even generally win against them. But they are so annoying. Heal and steal. Ugghhh...
2. Hunter - They have a counter for almost any situation while simultaneously pushing temp and dealing inevitable damage to your face. The biggest problem I have is the match ups. Hunter creates difficult match ups for many decks, even those that normally can deal with most other aggro decks. It's just frustrating to play against.
3. Shaman - I hate Bloodlust. They refill the board very easily. So you can't drag out a game against a Shaman because inevitably they will have a Bloodlust finisher waiting. I also find the Shaman spells far more annoying to face than other classes. They fill the board and keep you from doing so with their spells. It's like you almost need quality AoE to beat them. And there isn't much diversity in Shaman decks these days, so you are almost always facing the spell aggro with bloodlust threat.
4. Warrior - I don't hate facing Warrior. I actually kind of like facing Warrior. But I hate facing Brawl. If it weren't for that card they wouldn't be on the list. God forbid you do well against a Warrior they will just reset the board on turn 5. I rage hard at that card. It's more frustrating to face that kind of card against the class due to the nature of Control Warrior.
5. Anything Murloc
Interestingly enough, zoo doesn't make the list. I don't have a problem with most aggro decks. I have a problem with the way Hunter and Shaman do aggro. And Murlocs are annoying. But that's it.
The only thing I hate is seeing decks that everyone knows to be top tier in casual room. Casual is where people go to play fun, creative decks. Why someone who run top tier deck in there is beyond me. Ego boost after a few ladder losses perhaps?
The only thing I hate is seeing decks that everyone knows to be top tier in casual room. Casual is where people go to play fun, creative decks. Why someone who run top tier deck in there is beyond me. Ego boost after a few ladder losses perhaps?
Casual generally is where people grind gold. Unfortunately. And they want to do it as quickly as possible.
The only thing I hate is seeing decks that everyone knows to be top tier in casual room. Casual is where people go to play fun, creative decks. Why someone who run top tier deck in there is beyond me. Ego boost after a few ladder losses perhaps?
Casual generally is where people grind gold. Unfortunately. And they want to do it as quickly as possible.
That's sad and it sucks. But hey, whatever floats their boats.
both decks are incredibly annoying provided they get good hands and you do not, which 9/10 times is the case in my matchups. the answer is easily warlock though. any way you play that class is always 50/50 and determined by rng instead of skill
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Check out my decks & feel free to make suggestions!
Both of them are disgusting and if it weren't for the xpack Blizzard would have nerfed them to the ground just like they did with mage.
They are two classes that for the majority of the games don't even look at the board but just click opponent hero face which is why everyone hates them.
Takes zero skill to play, costs little to craft and can take you high in the ladder.
I do not really hate any classes, but when I'm playing control decks I tend to hate Priest a little bit. It always feels like they get exactly what they need from Thoughtsteal. I feel that incidents such as playing Harrison Jones just to see them play a weapon like Gorehowl the next turn happens all the time. It's so hard to predict and it can really destroy your game.
I love meeting Zoo and Hunter. Easy wins for tempo Priest, except where they get the god hand and I get the shit hand. But hey, that's variance. Much better than Handlock or Control Warrior. And Priest, after I took out my Ysera and MC to add in stuff relevant for the Hunter/Zoo matchup.
Me? I hate Zoo. Why? Because it doesn't matter if they play poorly or not, if you don't draw every single answer, you're going to get overrun by them. And all of their emotes just sound smug because they know there was nothing you could do about it.
I don't hate Hunters, I hate facing Hunter into Hunter into Hunter days. The meta changes all the time, but the one thing that stays the same is Hunters being the class that saturates the ladder the most.
I hate people who copy their decks from Hearthpwn and the like, then hop into "Casual" to test the deck because they're too stupid to come up with something on their own. Yes, my dumb decks don't win 100% or 90% of the time...heck, I'm lucky if they win 30% of the time, but at least they're MY dumb decks.
So, I guess I don't really hate any class, until I realize I've seen the deck 10+ times before from 10+ different people.
I just roll my eyes and deal with them at this point. At least the matches are over soon one way or another, and I'm just kind of numb to dealing with them by now. If I had to pick, I'd say Huntard is more annoying because their secrets are just irritating and not interesting to play against, personally.
Give me a protracted, tactically complicated siege against a Paladin, control warrior or priest any day.
The one deck that I truly hate playing against is Freeze Mage. It's even more boring to play against than aggro and the games last too long. Also I think Alexstrasza is just a disgusting and stupid mechanic. It's probably the only card in the game I would nerf if given the chance to change the game, and it kinda surprises me that I never really hear anyone complaining about it.
Zoolock is a bastard, most of the times, unless I really destroy it, it did'nt worth it.
Huntard depends of the deck. I actually found it less annoying to play against with my Handlock (pretty strange, is'nt it?). But I really hate it. When I play hunter, I refuse to play Undertakers and Scientists just because I find it dumb as hell, and I know nobody is gonna feel good with that.
As a (Deckhand)Miracle Rogue, I don't understand how, but I always get crushed by Control Warrior, at least since Naxx came. Since there is Loathebs, Belchers and so, I did'nt mange to win a single match against control warrior, does'nt matter what and how I played.
Freeze and Handmages really annoys me, but fortunately they are'nt that popular, anyway playing against freeze also gave me much better moments than Huntard and Zoolock, comparing.
Hunter for me. No matter how much control you have on the field, if you're already too low, then it's a ticking time for you. You opp will just hero power every f'king turn till you're dead
I used to despise priests until I watched Kimbler play it a couple of seasons ago and tried it myself.
I don't really hate any class but my least favourite is Warlock just because it's hard to know if it is handlock or zoo and frustrating when you guess wrong.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
My most hated:
1. Priest - I hate facing Priests. It's not that they are that much better. I even generally win against them. But they are so annoying. Heal and steal. Ugghhh...
2. Hunter - They have a counter for almost any situation while simultaneously pushing temp and dealing inevitable damage to your face. The biggest problem I have is the match ups. Hunter creates difficult match ups for many decks, even those that normally can deal with most other aggro decks. It's just frustrating to play against.
3. Shaman - I hate Bloodlust. They refill the board very easily. So you can't drag out a game against a Shaman because inevitably they will have a Bloodlust finisher waiting. I also find the Shaman spells far more annoying to face than other classes. They fill the board and keep you from doing so with their spells. It's like you almost need quality AoE to beat them. And there isn't much diversity in Shaman decks these days, so you are almost always facing the spell aggro with bloodlust threat.
4. Warrior - I don't hate facing Warrior. I actually kind of like facing Warrior. But I hate facing Brawl. If it weren't for that card they wouldn't be on the list. God forbid you do well against a Warrior they will just reset the board on turn 5. I rage hard at that card. It's more frustrating to face that kind of card against the class due to the nature of Control Warrior.
5. Anything Murloc
Interestingly enough, zoo doesn't make the list. I don't have a problem with most aggro decks. I have a problem with the way Hunter and Shaman do aggro. And Murlocs are annoying. But that's it.
The only thing I hate is seeing decks that everyone knows to be top tier in casual room. Casual is where people go to play fun, creative decks. Why someone who run top tier deck in there is beyond me. Ego boost after a few ladder losses perhaps?
Casual generally is where people grind gold. Unfortunately. And they want to do it as quickly as possible.
I bring life and pffffffffffffff!
That's sad and it sucks. But hey, whatever floats their boats.
Second that
both decks are incredibly annoying provided they get good hands and you do not, which 9/10 times is the case in my matchups. the answer is easily warlock though. any way you play that class is always 50/50 and determined by rng instead of skill
Check out my decks & feel free to make suggestions!
Both of them are disgusting and if it weren't for the xpack Blizzard would have nerfed them to the ground just like they did with mage.
They are two classes that for the majority of the games don't even look at the board but just click opponent hero face which is why everyone hates them.
Takes zero skill to play, costs little to craft and can take you high in the ladder.
I do not really hate any classes, but when I'm playing control decks I tend to hate Priest a little bit. It always feels like they get exactly what they need from Thoughtsteal. I feel that incidents such as playing Harrison Jones just to see them play a weapon like Gorehowl the next turn happens all the time. It's so hard to predict and it can really destroy your game.
I love meeting Zoo and Hunter. Easy wins for tempo Priest, except where they get the god hand and I get the shit hand. But hey, that's variance. Much better than Handlock or Control Warrior. And Priest, after I took out my Ysera and MC to add in stuff relevant for the Hunter/Zoo matchup.
Well maybe you should tech in some early game card then? ;)
But yeah, Pally early game is really inconsistent, especially with "stealth nerf" to consecrate with eggs and such.
Me? I hate Zoo. Why? Because it doesn't matter if they play poorly or not, if you don't draw every single answer, you're going to get overrun by them. And all of their emotes just sound smug because they know there was nothing you could do about it.
I don't hate Hunters, I hate facing Hunter into Hunter into Hunter days. The meta changes all the time, but the one thing that stays the same is Hunters being the class that saturates the ladder the most.
I hate people who copy their decks from Hearthpwn and the like, then hop into "Casual" to test the deck because they're too stupid to come up with something on their own. Yes, my dumb decks don't win 100% or 90% of the time...heck, I'm lucky if they win 30% of the time, but at least they're MY dumb decks.
So, I guess I don't really hate any class, until I realize I've seen the deck 10+ times before from 10+ different people.
i would like to change my most hated, freeze mage is easily the most annoying shit ever
Check out my decks & feel free to make suggestions!
I just roll my eyes and deal with them at this point. At least the matches are over soon one way or another, and I'm just kind of numb to dealing with them by now. If I had to pick, I'd say Huntard is more annoying because their secrets are just irritating and not interesting to play against, personally.
Give me a protracted, tactically complicated siege against a Paladin, control warrior or priest any day.
The one deck that I truly hate playing against is Freeze Mage. It's even more boring to play against than aggro and the games last too long. Also I think Alexstrasza is just a disgusting and stupid mechanic. It's probably the only card in the game I would nerf if given the chance to change the game, and it kinda surprises me that I never really hear anyone complaining about it.
Zoolock is a bastard, most of the times, unless I really destroy it, it did'nt worth it.
Huntard depends of the deck. I actually found it less annoying to play against with my Handlock (pretty strange, is'nt it?). But I really hate it. When I play hunter, I refuse to play Undertakers and Scientists just because I find it dumb as hell, and I know nobody is gonna feel good with that.
As a (Deckhand)Miracle Rogue, I don't understand how, but I always get crushed by Control Warrior, at least since Naxx came. Since there is Loathebs, Belchers and so, I did'nt mange to win a single match against control warrior, does'nt matter what and how I played.
Freeze and Handmages really annoys me, but fortunately they are'nt that popular, anyway playing against freeze also gave me much better moments than Huntard and Zoolock, comparing.
Click to see my Hearthstone projects:
The salt level is going through the roof in this thread.
lol agreed
Hunter and zoo can definitely be frustrating but I still believe they take skill to play to their full potential, so I've got no hate for aggro.
I also agree with many on this thread that priest is a frustrating matchup, though it's actually pushing me in the direction of playing priest myself.
Hunter for me. No matter how much control you have on the field, if you're already too low, then it's a ticking time for you. You opp will just hero power every f'king turn till you're dead
Only Anduin. Always long and always boring.
Can live with all the others :-)
I used to despise priests until I watched Kimbler play it a couple of seasons ago and tried it myself.
I don't really hate any class but my least favourite is Warlock just because it's hard to know if it is handlock or zoo and frustrating when you guess wrong.