TOP 150 LEGEND [EU] Beast Druid
- Last updated Sep 29, 2016 (Karazhan)
- Edit
- |
Wild
- 20 Minions
- 10 Spells
- Deck Type: Ranked Deck
- Deck Archetype: Beast Druid
- Crafting Cost: 4320
- Dust Needed: Loading Collection
- Created: 9/29/2016 (Karazhan)
- x_max_forward
- Registered User
-
- 4
- 10
- 23
-
Battle Tag:
N/A
-
Region:
EU
-
Total Deck Rating
178
Hello. I'm a regular legendary player from Belarus. Yesterday i riched top 150 legend with this deck.
90% of win condition - to do right mulligan.
ALWAYS KEEP:
- [card]Raven Idol[/card] (only vs. control decks). Very situative card. Good for disorientation of ur opponent. Can be replaced with second [card]Enchanted Raven[/card].
- [card]Living Roots[/card] (only 1)
- [card]Enchanted Raven[/card]
- [card]Darnassus Aspirant[/card] (even x2) main card for good start
- [card]Druid of the Saber[/card]
- [card]Mark of Y'Shaarj[/card] (only with [card]Enchanted Raven[/card] or [card]Druid of the Saber[/card] in start hand. Also keep if u have combination [card]Savage Combatant[/card] + [card]Innervate[/card] WITH COIN ONLY)
- [card]Druid of the Flame[/card]/[card]Mounted Raptor[/card] (only with coin or if u already have 1 and 2 drops). Also keep in combination [card]Darnassus Aspirant[/card] + coin. Be carefull vs. druids and warriors with this strategy.
- [card]Savage Combatant[/card] ( only with [card]Innervate[/card] ).
- [card]Druid of the Claw[/card]/[card]Stranglethorn Tiger[/card] ( only with [card]Innervate[/card] and coin , if u already have 1st drop in hand.
- [card]Swipe[/card] (only vs. Zoo/Discard lock, if u already have 1 and 2 drops).
- [card]Azure Drake[/card]/[card]Stranglethorn Tiger[/card] (vs. Control decks only with [card]Innervate[/card] + coin, if u already have 1st drop).
DO NOT KEEP:
- 3x cards for 2 mana.
- 2x cards for 1 mana.
Leave comments and vote for this deck if u like it.
worst deck ever even from purify priest
definately not worse but its not very good. Just decent.
Question - on turn one if you have living roots and you go first, do you summon the sapplings or save it for removal?
I like this deck i have stats 15 3 and i think i can get legend with this now i am rank 13 before this deck i dont play druid :P
Terrible deck, you cant even win on Rank 20, let alone legend
Both beast druids supposed to be similar doubt he even watches muzzy
Two cards can make a huge difference.
But it's not like either of these guys is a genius for realizing that Beast Druid can take advantage of Menagerie Warden and Mark of Y'Shaarj.
Are there any videos playing this deck going step-by-step explaining each move? I reached 18 with this deck so far and i wish to improve.
as the case may be, use your brain and decide what u need - removals or creatures on board.
its better to replace this card with something else since this deck doesnt run Fandral. Anyway the deck isnt good so i suggest you try sth else or just different version of beast druid.
Hi do you have deck without blackrock cards?
2nd Raptor and 2nd Raven probably
I will try it, ty
Zhive Belarus' :D
riched beached
Would have been nice if you credited LG_Muzzy as this is the exact deck he posted up on his twitter 9/22/2016
I have no twitter account, so i havent seen it. Now i see it. There are some differences in this deck.
2 cards
Well if it's not the same deck, no credit is needed. There are only so many viable iterations of any deck that can be made. If everyone was expected to credit everyone else's deck that is within 2 cards of their own, that would be ridiculous.
So if I took the original zoo and changed 2 cards I invented a new type? Nope still considered zoo. There is a core and then there is tech choices...The two decks are 94% exact. Thus same core of Muzzy's design with 2 tech choices. I get people want to feel accomplishment and having some one come in and say been done before is a bit insulting to ones ego. So again people can down vote for pointing out the obvious and thats fine. You are only lying to yourself in the end.
Professionals should know that 2 cards could already change the way a deck is played.
Literally every change can make it a new deck they are all just in the same "category" of decks.
There are enough decks here with specific cards in the titel cause including them is a fresh or other way to play the deck ... or they are just new.
Your words are partly right but you can't deny people the right to post decks when many decks got a pretty solid core you can't avoid.