Hearthpwn

definately not worse but its not very good. Just decent.

Question - on turn one if you have living roots and you go first, do you summon the sapplings or save it for removal?

I like this deck i have stats 15 3 and i think i can get legend with this now i am rank 13 before this deck i dont play druid :P

Both beast druids supposed to be similar doubt he even watches muzzy

Two cards can make a huge difference.

But it's not like either of these guys is a genius for realizing that Beast Druid can take advantage of Menagerie Warden and Mark of Y'Shaarj.

Are there any videos playing this deck going step-by-step explaining each move? I reached 18 with this deck so far and i wish to improve.

as the case may be, use your brain and decide what u need - removals or creatures on board.

its better to replace this card with something else since this deck doesnt run Fandral. Anyway the deck isnt good so i suggest you try sth else or just different version of beast druid.

Hi do you have deck without blackrock cards?

2nd Raptor and 2nd Raven probably

I will try it, ty
Zhive Belarus' :D

riched beached

I have no twitter account, so i havent seen it. Now i see it. There are some differences in this deck.

2 cards

Well if it's not the same deck, no credit is needed. There are only so many viable iterations of any deck that can be made. If everyone was expected to credit everyone else's deck that is within 2 cards of their own, that would be ridiculous.

So if I took the original zoo and changed 2 cards I invented a new type? Nope still considered zoo. There is a core and then there is tech choices...The two decks are 94% exact. Thus same core of Muzzy's design with 2 tech choices. I get people want to feel accomplishment and having some one come in and say been done before is a bit insulting to ones ego. So again people can down vote for pointing out the obvious and thats fine. You are only lying to yourself in the end.

Professionals should know that 2 cards could already change the way a deck is played.

Literally every change can make it a new deck they are all just in the same "category" of decks.

There are enough decks here with specific cards in the titel cause including them is a fresh or other way to play the deck ... or they are just new.

Your words are partly right but you can't deny people the right to post decks when many decks got a pretty solid core you can't avoid.