Sorcerer's Apprentice
Card Text
Your spells cost (1) less
(but not less than 1).
Flavor Text
Apprentices are great for bossing around. "Conjure me some mana buns! And a coffee! Make that a mana coffee!"
Card Sounds
Your spells cost (1) less
(but not less than 1).
Apprentices are great for bossing around. "Conjure me some mana buns! And a coffee! Make that a mana coffee!"
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
Holy shit it finally happened - the way it should have been from the beginning.
and
Let's think about this for a moment...
not less than one, clowns
This card is gonna make me quit wild at this rate. Either increase it's mana cost to 3 mana or make it "but not less than (1)"
But not less than 1, you small indie company.
You won.
still broken still op STILL NOT NERFED DEVS STILL DUMB AF
they really still have decided not to nerf this card when its been completely broken and people have asked for nerfs for YEARS haha you devs are wild it is a wonder how you sht-for-brains have not been fired and replaced yet
this card is op BROKEN NERF IT ALREADY we are all tired of the cancer decks that this card enables TIRED OF IT
It's time to make it so that spells won't coss less than 1
play sound gives me PTSD
They should nerf it to "make your spells cost (1) less but no less then (1) it'd still be a strong effect but wouldn't be cancerous in tavern brawls or in OTK decks
everytime she say "Me... ?" , i rethink my planned moves..
Even with a Freeze Mage it would probably be rare, but imagine dropping two of these with 2 Frostbolt and 2 Ice Lance. Maybe a Fireball or two if they run with some. That's a 20-26 damage turn for 6-8 mana, but very unlikely outcome.
HowlingLotus, it just happened to me, got 30 health OTK with azure drake on board
Does this effect stack with two apprentices on the field?
From the description, shouldn't this card have the possibility of making spells cost -ive mana?
After all "(1) less than" 0 = -1.
no... because why make anything negative when its already at 0......
Why not make anything negative? That isn't the point though. It says it costs less. If it is at 0 then it doesn't cost anything so it can't cost less. No need to be snarky with peoples questions brah.
"Less" is the operating word here. -12 is "something", and less of something always moves towards 0. The only integer you cannot have less of.