This deck is such a blast to play with! not only is it a lot of fun but is also quite straightforward in the way it needs to be played. love the buffoons for extra pyro activations and of course having spirit of the dead to make sure you always have big boys in the deck!!
I made a video showcasing the deck in action, I hope you all enjoy it!
- terrupon
- Registered User
-
Member for 6 years, 8 months, and 15 days
Last active Thu, Jul, 2 2020 04:34:07 -
- 2
- 19
- 33
- 0 Followers
- 5 Total Posts
- 4 Thanks
-
3
kiwiinbacon posted a message on BIG COMBO Priest (Legend)Posted in: BIG COMBO Priest (Legend) -
5
Strika78 posted a message on Shudderwock OTK Infinite Drain LifePosted in: Shudderwock OTK Infinite Drain LifeI played two Mana Tide Totems and burned my Shudderwock on the next turn. That's all you have to know about my playstyle. ))
-
4
dontbemad posted a message on Shudderwock OTK Infinite Drain LifePosted in: Shudderwock OTK Infinite Drain LifeI feel like Tar Creeper's are performing much better than Feral Spirits at 3 mana slot.
-
7
juanlu555 posted a message on [Rank 4 to legend] TempolockPosted in: [Rank 4 to legend] TempolockI've replaced one Blazecaller for one Abyssal Enforcer. I find it opens a little bit your possibilities for clearing the board in rough situations and can improve Bloodreaver Gul'dan.
Thank you for the great deck!!
-
29
targeting posted a message on #3 Legend Non-Barnes HunterPosted in: #3 Legend Non-Barnes Hunterinto dust
-
56
cabrenor posted a message on Mathematical PROOF that Standard Ladder is RiggedPosted in: General DiscussionI know this really is an irrelevant topic......but I still think we have a right to know. I am a Statistician by trade, with over 15 years of experience crunching p-values and t-tests. So I decided to run a statistics experiment to test my theory. I would encourage anyone to repeat my experiment and see if you get similar result.
Procedure: I climbed to Rank 5 using a Pally Murloc Deck. I rapidly ascended to this rank, and then, of course, ran into the Void Lord and Cubelocks. Earlier than rank 5, I got a fairly even mix of opponents, but because the Cubelock is dominating right now, I expected to see more of them at the higher ranks. So......I changed one card in my deck. ONE CARD. I swapped out a knife juggler for a Defias Cleaner to get an extra silence tech. I was already running 2 spellbreakers, so this card had no purpose other than to silence a voidlord.
I immediately noticed the ladder was not facing me against cubelocks anymore. Since I couldn't lose stars at that rank, I started a game, and if it wasn't a warlock, I just conceded. It literally took me 17 games to even face a warlock.......and the deck was a ZOO build....NOT Cubelock. It took me 26 concessions to find a cubelock to go against.....because I changed one card to counter that deck,
I repeated that experiment every 3 hours.....just to allow some new players to come on and off.
I used 26 matches as my standard candle. (No pun unintended)
Trial 1 : 3.8% chance of facing cubelock
Trial 2: 4.0% chance of facing cubelock
Trial 3: 4.2% chance of facing cubelock
Average: With deck holding 3 silences, instead of 2.....the chance of facing cubelock was 4.0%
OPPOSITION EXPERIMENT:
I took the Defias Cleaner out, and put my knife juggler back in.
Again standard candle of 26 games at Rank 5:
Trial 1: 73.2 % chance of facing cubelock
Trial 2: 57.6% chance of facing cubelock
Trial 3: 69.2% chance of facing cubelock
Average 66.6% chance of facing cubelock.
Remember, this is a sampling of over 150 games, 75 WITH a 3rd Silence (No Cubelocks), and 75 with only 2 Silences (Many Cubelocks)
By changing ONE card in my deck, the likelihood that I would face the deck it was DESIGNED to beat went down by a factor of 4.5. When I removed that one card, the likelihood I would face that same deck went UP by a factor of 4.
As a further test, I took out a card and added a Ravenholdt Assassin, which has the same stats as a Defias Cleaner, but no silence. I saw ZERO change in the amount of cubelocks I was facing with the card, but did only run one trial.
So right now, Pally, Priest, and Warlock, and hunter are the classes to beat. You would think you would see them on average every four games, with a couple randoms thrown in.
But based on switching out ONE card.....and running hundreds of trials I found my chance of facing a cubelock DROPPED 62% when I put in a tech card to counter it. One Single Card.....the Defias Cleaner.
I implore someone to recreate my experiment. If Blizzard is fudging the latter, we need to know about it.
"Paranoid Player"
-
2
dtake posted a message on Good Tavern Brawl DeckPosted in: Good Tavern Brawl DeckThis deck is a fairly similar Standard deck that works pretty well.
-
2
DanielZur posted a message on Good Tavern Brawl DeckPosted in: Good Tavern Brawl DeckSo, here's my summary of my 8-3 run with this deck. I subbed one Lackey for a Portal, because more damage:
1. Priest [WIN] 1-0
2. Warrior [WIN] 2-0
3. Paladin [LOSS] 2-1
4. Hunter [WIN] 3-1
5. Druid [WIN] 4-1
6. Shaman [WIN] 5-1 (at this point I'm extremely impressed I have been paired with all different classes)
7. Warlock [WIN] 6-1 (beyond impressed, starting to wonder if it's on purpose)
8. Priest [WIN] 7-1 (the dream is dead)
9. Shaman [LOSS] 7-2
10. Warlock [WIN] 8-2
11. Hunter [LOSS] 8-3 -
1
wolvoline posted a message on Good Tavern Brawl DeckPosted in: Good Tavern Brawl DeckI just went 12-2 with my free run, I did not make any changes to the deck, Your worst enemy with this deck are warlocks other than that you can beat every deck if you get a bit lucky and you play smart. :)
Good Luck if you use it ^_^
Proof LOL
https://imgur.com/a/D3svT
https://imgur.com/a/7Cc30 -
2
IHIIHI posted a message on Good Tavern Brawl DeckPosted in: Good Tavern Brawl DeckAgree, i think to remove both Kabal Lackey and add Pyroblast with Medivh, the Guardian
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
3
We get 3/3 minions
3
any replacement for pyros?