Hearthpwn

Quote from SchruteBucks >>

is 3 mana

heartpwn: costs 6 mana

you guys are really good at evaluating cards. /s

Judging it one way, it is a 6 mana 2/8 taunt, and is outclassed by Ancient of Blossoms which never saw play.

ancient of blossoms is a pretty solid 3-drop to be perfectly honest. 

Quote from Pacster2 >>

I think a lot of players overestimate the value of this card. 4/6 for 6 is bad...and the special ability only works once....so nobody will run more than one of those in his deck. It's a turn 6 card...so you will most likely not want it in your starting hand. That leaves you with like a 15-20% chance(not feeling to do the real maths right now) to have it by turn 6. So even if you hit on a druid or priest that is heavyly relying on 1cost spells...well...it does not mean that you get the card in time. Not to mention, that your opponent may already have used quite a number of his 1 cost spells(you mulligan for those and you usually don't keep them on hand for turn 10 or so). Yes, greedy jade druids may run into trouble once in a blue moon...but that's not going to ruin them either.

Going to be hilarious tho if  a priest copies that from your deck and can't play it then. ;-)

Quote from Kleinth16 >>

I'm saying that this card won't see competitive play if something big doesn't happen to quest shaman, of course you can play this at ladder but it's different in competitive hearthstone.

Quote from trmeilo >>

This card is not healthy for the game. When you have to print a card just to counter another one because that card held the whole meta back from playing a heavy control/fatigue style deck. It's also way to effective against other decks than jade druid. 

Druid: Earthen Scales, Jade Idol, Mark of the Lotus (doesn't matter that much since it's turn 6)

Priest: Power Word: Shield, Potion of Madness, Inner Fire (fuck your combo)

Rogue: Hallucination, Journey Below

Shaman: Evolve

Warlock: Mortal Coil, Soulfire

Warrior: Shield Slam (see, it also punishes other control decks), Whirlwind

Just another epic tech card you have to put in your control deck to stand a chance against one particular deck. Still like it 

This is also a buff to archbishop decks to get rid of cheap junk in control warrior matchups like whirlwinds and shield slam and other control matchups. Along with hemet, archbishop is looking to be better and better.

At least it's an execute buff

Quote from Mancer >>

I think this card will break the meta. No prince keleseth + hunter quest, no jade idols, alot of mage and hunter cards destroyed, paladin secrets all die. This is too op, and i think this is gonna ruin the meta. It is not even legendary, wtf. 

Quote from finniggann >>

this plus primalfin goes infinite, the paladin buff deck can now basically run primalfin and this as 2 ofs, and then a bunch of buffs. And it will have so much lategame value, priest could entomb it and silence stops it, but otherwise this card plus primalfin is infinite value.

It's not unlimited. You get at the start of a turn and it disappears next turn. Also you can only play it once a turn.

Has anybody watched the revels stream, gonna be a lot of people disappointed 

HAppened to me with Old gods and Mean Streets in first 6 packs each. Classic didn't work after open 12.

He said destroying deck SYNERGY not the deck. Learn to read!

If drawing games by reaching the turn limit becomes a thing in tournaments then player stamina is going to become an important resource like in Tennis or other Sports. Esports trying to be more like IRL sports Kappa

Lol with this and Dead Man's Hand there's gonna be a new archetype 'Draw Warrior' and/or 'Draw Priest' MonkaS

Quote from Ophion >>

Quote from MetaRifting >>  

 I *might* be wrong. But I don't think the spell is recast multiple times, it will just count as one spell with a cascading effect. So the latter two synergies don't count.

 I do think it works that way because of how the other similar card, Spreading Plague, is worded. If it didn't work that way, why isn't Spreading Plague worded like Unleash the Hounds? They chose the more complex wording for some reason, and I can only imagine that it's exactly to clarify this interaction.

Lol cut prince malchezaar if it puts 2 or 3 mana cards in your deck it stops the other princes working.