• 1

    posted a message on Ben Brodes recently puplished information
    Quote from swinkscalibur >>

    What does OG mean? As in Noxious is OG?

     Ocean Grown or Original Gangster. Do you like weed or rap? Your call.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Blizzard, what didn't you understand of the phrase "stop RNG in this game"?
    Quote from TheWamts >>

    You realize that drawing a card is still "random"? It's not possible to make a card game not random once you get past like, 30ish cards.

    You realize that having cards with the word "Random" in the text makes the game more random than without those cards?
    Bringing up the fact that card draw is random is irrelevant. It's like if someone asked if you like apples or oranges? And you responded with "Planes hurt my ears." Just change topics when you can't contribute with something releveant to the discussion at hand. Just like a politician, or an AI deficient computer. Try to be more human.
    OP is not talking about turning Hearthstone into a game with ABSOLUTELY ZERO RNG. He's talking about the cards that have the Random text. He's not talking about the RNG of the draw.
    In most card games the draw is random, but not the cards you play, and that is more than enough RNG. If when playing poker, every time you played a card you had to roll a dice to determine the value of the card, that would be a completely shit game that no one would play. That is essentially what these random text cards do. MAKE THE GAME MUCH MORE RANDOM THAN JUST THE DRAW THAT ALL CARD GAMES HAVE.
    And with just the draw randomness, average players win the WSOP every year. But even these so called, "average" poker players have spent countless hours playing and understanding the game of poker and are only average when compared to the absolute best. That time spent learning is what makes the difference between a random knockout and making the final table. If the card values were tied to a RNG dice roll, good players would become completely irrelevant. The game would be about as fun as buying a lotto ticket, not very.
    Might I remind you that Hearthstone started out, and became wildly popular without all the RNG. Pre-GvG the RNG was quite low.
     
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on The last 4 paladin cards

    Couldn't be happier for the direction and the deck themes they are pushing on Paladin, but the last 4 cards better be balls to the walls amazing or Paladin will be unplayable.

    Seriously needs some early game and single target any type of removal/damaging spell, and needs card draw, and a weapon. They need more things than cards available to be revealed. Looking grim.

    Posted in: Paladin
  • 3

    posted a message on The last 4 paladin cards
    Quote from The6thDangerZone >>
    Quote from DoubleSummon >>
    Quote from Nosohryz >>

    Paladin dont deserve any good new cards.

     Why? Cause they have currently top tier decks? It doesn't mean the class has to die..
     No, but they have the most miserable frustrating top tier decks, and the operative is the plural. They have top tier decks, some of the most efficient removal, and the best class legendary in the game. They have so many misery inducing bullshit cards, They've had their time far too long, they were and still are more cancerous than grim patron ever could've been, and paladins, along with their mysterious cocksucker, needs to be deleted. Literally no other class is as miserable to play against. Literally none. Whats worse, is blizzard actually doesn't care about the players, and so wild will become a secret cuntadin fuckfest of fuckery, as they're just gonna keep giving them better secrets. So yes. The class has to die. Let shaman or rogue have a go at the top tier. Fuck paladins to hell where they belong.
     

    Paladin has 0 Tier 1 decks at the moment. Everything Paladin has is easily counterable, and they haven't even been nerfed yet.

    Most effecient removal? That's laughable. Paladins have the worst removal of all 9 classes and everyone knows it.

    Paladins are also probably being hit hardest by formats also. Go try and find tournament play from pre-GvG era with Paladins. Almost unfindable, I used to watch just for the Paladins and many tournaments didn't even have Paladins because they were generally regarded as the worst of the 9.

    Even Midrage deck wasn't that strong, a few weeks after release and it got hard countered. Secret Paladin, down to Tier 2 without any nerfs, and they are coming. Anyfin down to Tier 2 or worse and nerfs are coming. No Paladin deck is currently above Tier 2 and all the current Paladin decks are getting nerfed hard.

    Another shitty 3 mana 3/3 that will ruin the Flood deck they have been trying to push for 2 expansions now.

    Paladins have a good curve and that is all. Even with the "best curve" it is still easily countered because that is ALL they have. Thta's why the "OP" Secret Paladin deck is down to Tier 2. It was always easily counterable if people just got their heads out of their asses and played the available counters. All Paladin decks are easily counterable if you have a brain cause they only do one predictiable thing, play on curve, non-reactive, they have no burst, worst removal, pretty much no other option.

    I just leave it like this. How does Secret Paladin go from Tier 1 to Tier 2 with no nerfs? No changed cards, no new sets released? Answer is that it was never OP, people just learned how to play. If anything people should be thanking Secret Paladin for enlightenting them to some real card play, as opposed to what they were previously doing: just playing on-curve decks with all classes and then crying how one on-cuve deck isn't as good as some other on-curve deck.

    Posted in: Paladin
  • 2

    posted a message on Mysterious Challenger

    LOOK OUT!!!!

    He's gonna crash, his horse has a secret stuck in his eye.

    Maybe it's cause I'm from the cold but evergreens are so comforting. He looks great in green.

    And O Tannenbaum is such a happy sounding, upbeat song. Well atleast this one is, and less lively versions are peaceful which isn't bad either.

    Posted in: Mysterious Challenger
  • 6

    posted a message on Tuskarr Jouster

    Awesome new card art.

    It's turtles all the way down.

    Three turtles of varying sizes stacked on top of each other with the largest at the bottom

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down

    Or maybe just the beginning of a hundred turtle stack.

    Posted in: Tuskarr Jouster
  • 2

    posted a message on What is the future of Paladin in Standard?

    I'm guessing it's time for Paladin to finally receive a decent single target removal / damage spell.

    If not, they will have to give Paladin a bunch more best, on-curve cards in many mana slots.

    Seems like people are sick of that. Paladin players don't want to play on-curve tempo/aggro, and people playing against Paladin are sick of it too.

    No one wants Paladin to be an aggro class.

    Just give us the removal already and make Paladin a control class.

     

    Posted in: Paladin
  • 1

    posted a message on Reward cards (Gelbin, Old Murk-Eye etc) won't be Standard legal

    Yeah I really see no logic behind this. Old Murk Eye is only a potential problem with Anyfin Can Happen.

    But with the new set rotations, it will be rotated out next year, so at maximum it could only be a problem for 1 year, on top of the fact that it isn't even a problem or highly played deck yet.

    If the problem is Charge, then change Old Murk Eye but don't remove him from the game. Anyfin Can Happen can only be around for a year.

    And it isn't even a problem yet. You didn't fix Boom or Shredder for far too long, made us all play with that garbage, and even got the casters/pros to get off your back by letting them in on the secret that the cards they hate will eventually change format, so they left it. Backhanded as well a illogical. Everyday Blizzard becomes a worse and worse company.

    Even though the new Standard format will take the game back to a much more skilled and less random environment like it was pre-GvG, and I love card games, it looks like it might be time to bust out the old Ice Age deck, or even a simple set of 52 for some Euchre or Poker with some friends.

    I'm not sure that I can play much longer, purley based on how shitty Blizzard is. Worst "Gaming" Company ever, if what they make can even be called video games anymore. More of a mix between phone based trash apps and a casino, no room for a quality game. The worst part is that is their intention, not to make a quality game, but to make an addicting, aggressive money gathering system. Rediculous that online poker is illegal in America, but they allow this trash to float about. Heartstone is so much worse than online poker.

    And to those that say that is the point of a company, to make money: maybe you are too young to remember, but companies weren't always run with the ruthless manner that they are today. Wage differences between higherups and low-rung workers was nearly equal 60 years ago. Even things like backbacks were made with much higher quality in the past, if your parent or grandparent has a backpack that is atleast 50 years old, take a look at the fine construction and materials and care that went into making that bag, and just the fact that it is still around 50 years later. One should wonder why backpacks nowadays can't be made the same, why a modern backpack lasts about a year before it's in tatters and nearly everything today is made, to make the most money, with no care for the consumer or worker, or planet which might be the one suffering the most do to careless expending of resources, on shitty short-term, high-profit items.

    Even older gaming companies were not nearly as profit driven. They made less money, and better games, funny how that works.

    And to those that want to support these games, it is a nice altruistic gesture on your part to feel like it is your responsiblity to keep the company afloat, or atleast pay "your share." I can assure you they will not reurn the gesture, they will not show one drop of altruistic nature toward you, they actually pray on our good intentions, one who feels obligated to fund them so they make a better game or what not, are the juicy targets that the vampire known a COMPANY intends to suck dry. Trickle-down is FAIL. Giving them more money has almost no effect on the quality of the game or future games. Trickle-down is a LIE. If anything the opposite might be closer to the truth. Giving them more money will yield worse products.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Why do people HATE secret Paladin?
    Quote from TheWamts >>

    Because they want to feel intellectually superior to the people playing the top-tier deck, but get irrationally mad when they lose to it.

     This is probably the most accurate reason.
    Either that or they claim Secret Paladin is an Autopilot deck because their other autopilot decks can't beat it.
    When it comes down to it, if Secret Paladin is such a braindead deck, and these people complaining about it are bastions of intellect, then why don't they play the obvious control counters?
    The answer is because they also want to play braindead decks, aka almost every deck since Naxx. Secret Paladin is no worse than any of the others we've had, it's just the most recent.
    Ben Brode and the Numbers confirm, it is not the most played deck, not even 20% of the meta, and it certainly does not have the highest winrate.
    Anyone complaining about SP is as braindead as the players they accuse, if not more.
     
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Why do folks hate priest so much??

    The class should be called: Thief

    They are hated cause they are kleptomaniacs.

    If they actually focused on Priest things, like Healing and buffing, it would probably be my second favorite class.

    But alas, they are not Priests, they are Thiefs.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.