Hearthpwn

Damn, I just noticed that you need to not have more than 1 copy of the card IN YOUR DECK, not in your list, lol whoops.

So I changed the list for a second molten and second ice block, which made the deck better. I have been  playing this deck, only, today and yesterday and I think this is a pretty good result.

I wasn't sure about Paletress and decided to craft her yesterday.

I really do not regret doing so. I'd take her over ysera anytime, which was my biggest concern(even though I run both ysera and paletress).

One thing that seems like not a big deal, but is, is the fact that you get to hero power the turn you play paletress. Against agressive decks, geting that hero power to go is a really big deal. Sometimes ysera feels like a big investment because you lose tempo from your board or health if you're geting raced. With Paletress you can heal one minion and get a better tempo than ysera would give you, or you can heal yourself.

But anyway, priest can afford to run both, so it is not a matter of which one is better.

It is very unlikely that you get a really bad legendary. Even a mediocre one would be better than drawing a laughing sister, for example - sometimes even a bad one would be better than drawing laughing sister, because it is already played on the field. And in a control matchup ysera is as likely to die as paletress is. And in a aggro matchup paletress is faster and is a stronger tempo play than ysera.

I was very skeptical about her, but I think, after using her myself, that she is an amazing legendary.

Mr Yogurt DansGame

You probably got bad rng. I won with this deck and thought I might share, but there are some 3/3 charge RNG that is really really hard to beat.

Also, you don't need to express yourself in such a rude manner, even if you didn't like the deck. You're free to critique the fight and the deck, but have manners. Grow up.

He does not attack while kel thuzad is around?

Oh man, nice. Didn't know that. Cool trick. I would sub the same card that you did.

Good call, thanks.

Freeze mage is a deck where you balance card draw, freezes, and burn, and adjust them accordingly to the meta. The real core cards of the deck are alextrasza and ice blocks.

The more card draw you have, the more consistent your deck will be, so you're always trying to fit in cards like Loot Hoarder in the deck. Because of the current meta, you see most popular lists runing double loot hoarder, but the last freeze mage(list that hyp3d used) had none, and more freezes/removals because of the meta. For some time Novice Engineer was a card draw in the deck.

Archmage Antonidas was not always used and it was, for a long time, switched back and forth with Pyroblast because using both was "too much". But now we have Emperor Thaurissan which makes Antonidas A LOT stronger, so I think it'll be a staple now, but I wouldn't go as far as saying it is a win condition(unless you're playing against a warrior). I think you can still play freeze without him, but your deck will be substantly weaker, but still viable.

You'll probably want to add Mad Scientist to get that secret value and go over the deck quickly. Freezes like Frost Nova, Cone of Cold(there was a period of time where decks didnt run cone of cold until hyp3d add them back) and Blizzard and removal like Flamestrike are also mandatory, but the meta will call the amount of cards you'll use.

You'll need card draw through Arcane Intellect, Acolyte of Pain and Loot Hoarder, but the meta will call how many. Usually 2x acolytes and 2x intellect for sure and as many loot hoarders as you can fit. Loot hoarder is usually the first card to cut to include cards as Antique Healbot. A flamestrike and a blizzard were cut to fit the 2x hoarders you see right now, reason being these cards are not as good as they were.

Doomsayer is almost mandatory. Your deck you be way weaker without him. It used to be good against aggro, but now every aggro runs silence because of belchers, so it is not as good against aggro anymore, you can't rely on him, but it straight destroys paladins and priests. And by forcing a silence it stalls even aggro decks a little more.

Burns you want to include every burn you can. Pyroblast always was a debatable card, even today, imo. But with Emperor Thaurissan and the amount of warriors around, you might want to play pyroblast. I always liked pyroblast, and before emperor I used to run it over antonidas in some metas.

Well, this is how I see the freeze mage deck.

I really want to like hungry dragon, but I can't. I was very excited to play it, but it is just bad in the current meta.

You think you'll have minions to trade with it and, since you're a priest, you'll get value, but you end up helping the opponent. If you're playing against face hunter, you just help them get more face damage, if you're playing against zoo, they buff the minion you gave them and kill yours. Against paladin you follow the rules. Against druid they use the minion you gave them and just swipe your dragon...

Against most decks in the current meta I can't seem to consistently find a good hungry dragon turn.

Chromaggus is another card I want to like and I'm trying right now, but I feel like when I enter the late game it is just too slow and does nothing.

Twilight whelp is a really bad card...

I thought it would be cool, but I can't seem to find it good atm. I hope the dragons from the last wing would help priest, and I think they will.

I came here to tell about some of our usual deadly poison + blade flurry thoughtsteal, but two majordomos is just the wrost possible combination of cards you could thoughtsteal.

Jesus christ.

Went to try again and I've got the coin hero power quite often. So I changed the deck, taking out the cards that I didn't feel that helped much.

While making this deck I think I won 4 more times and played around 12 games. A lot of the times I was stuck with shadow word deaths, inner fires, and didn't get a good start. But once you get a good start, it's not that hard.

One thing  I noticed is that he mostly played coin if I didn't have a 1 drop. Most of the times  when I played a  1 drop he would play either that egg or twilight whelp.

And once you get a deathlord with divine spirit on, he will never pass again.

EDIT:
Thanks for the helping me. I was indeed lucky  and the deck was not the best it could be. I hope this revision can make the matchup easier and more likely to align.

Would you consider adding a second Molten Giant just for more consistency?

If you don't have Molten Giant in hand before you Reno Jackson it's over anyway right?

So where's the anti aggro ?
I'm done with this game, my hopes were high to fix the ladder and the infest of certain archetypes, but aparently they rather make money off headless chickens instead of trying to balance a game which will result in more people liking it = more income in the end.

This deck is dank, but the dank ability of the Pyromancer has some anti-synergy with the Loot Hoarder's dank draw. Maybe the Loot Hoarders could be replaced with a couple Dank Cultists.

The 2 most recent priests I've played ran something along the lines of this list, so I figured it has to be some kindof new trend I'm not aware of. Can't find the actual list so I'll rant here a bit, if you don't mind.

Haven't played it in first person, but the deck is incredibly frustrating to play AGAINST. I will try to iterate the changes I noticed.

My opponents played something along the lines of

-1 Shrinkmeister
-1 Shadow Madness
-1 Cabal Shadow Priest
-2 Loot Hoarder
-2 Acolyte of Pain
-1 Earthen Ring Farseer
-1 Sylvanas Windrunner
+1 Shadow Word: Pain
+1 Holy Nova
+2 Thoughtsteal
+2 Coldlight Oracle
+2 Deathlord
+1 Antique Healbot
+1 Doomsayer

That's roughly what I can recall, as again, I've only seen the deck on the receiving side. It's really similar to the 'outlast' druid from a while back, and I can't really tell which is stronger in what it does, druid certainly had more milling options, but priests removal and health preservation seems better. My question, did you encounter this sort of deck on ladder and made adjustments that fit your playstyle or is it like you said - something that was inspired by other class archetypes.

As for your deck, I guess I owe you some critique:

Honestly, I feel like if you stick a Velen in there you might want to go all the way and make it a straight up cheese combo deck - what I'm saying, more cycles - power word shield, novice engineer, maybe a random drake even or thalnos. Add mechanical sheep for some additional clears, something along those lines. But that's all suggestions, if the deck is working for you as is, I'm glad and wish you best of luck all the way still. Cheers!

probably the most hilarious hearthstone moment i ever witnessed 

i must confess i was playing this deck on casual and somewhat drunk accidentally holy fired my own prophet velven. the resulting gain in life was still enough to make the hunter concede next turn 

The most fun I've had playing priest in a long time

works great

Your deck looks like its trying to do way too many things at once.