-
- Kurgo
- Registered User
-
Member for 4 years, 1 month, and 20 days
Last active Wed, Jun, 15 2022 00:31:25 -
- 6
- 22
- 0 Followers
- 322 Total Posts
- 248 Thanks
⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
0
I mean, if we're being pedantic it's not a big finger up to everyone, just to the wild playerbase. Not like standard players will miss cards they can't possibly use.
0
In what parallel universe does this deck crush anything exactly? If this deck was actually good against rogues it'd be played in high legend and yet...no one does, cos the deck is complete and utter garbage.
1
Considering that big spell mage literally isn't a deck anywhere outside of bronze and that mozaki is one of the top choices at 1k legend...what are you smoking, exactly?
0
Basically just curious to see whether guff will work in alignment druid. Seems to me like a decent enough card (play it at 5 straight into alignment the next turn) but heh, no idea.
Other than that...not much else. Meta will still be odd questline hunter, questline warrior and even/painlocks. I hope I won't see more galakrond shaman because god that's such a boring archetype to face. But yeah, that's it, questlines are too powerful for many other strategies to be particularly viable.
1
Uhm, it's not pros who say the deck is tier 3 (and incidentally, pros have been snubbing questline mage forever in tournaments, for pretty obvious reasons), but stats from both hsreplay and vs. If you keep losing to it with decks that have 53% wr (ele shaman) and 68% wr (face hunter) then either you're unlucky, your opponent is lucky...or you're not playing very well the matchup. Elemental shaman isn't dominant in any way shape or form against mage but if you keep losing to questline with a deck that has a 68% wr against it across ladder and a 72% wr in legend...well, the problem is probably you, not the opponent's deck.
0
Yeah, that'd be such a great solution for questline pwar, questline hunter and even renolock. Wow, truly solved the meta, thank you.
2
I mean, salt posts dominate literally everything else in all competitive games fora, I've seen this kind of thing in quake champions, overwatch, valorant, cs:go...without even mentioning shit piles that are DOTA and LOL, which house some of the most toxic communities in the entire gaming industry. Do you want to guess why? Could it be because you don't play GTA against anyone else, you don't play your guitar against anyone else and you don't build your PC against anyone else? Might have something to do with that...possibly.
Here's a hint for you, people who have fun have almost literally no reason whatsoever to step on a forum to say "hey, I'm having so much fun". After all, why would you interrupt the fun you have to let other people know? People who are not having fun, on the other hand...there are those who aren't having fun and decide to just do/play something else. And then there are those who need to let everyone know that game x isn't fun, community x is shit, devs x are incompetent and franchise x is doomed. That's how these things work.
0
The fact that you let a warlock complete their quest and reach fatigue is probably a big reason why you keep losing against them. I can't even remember the last warlock I faced that completed the quest in standard, let alone used fatigue to kill me.
0
This is a dumb take, no offence. Baku and genn weren't rotated to wild because "they restrict deck building creativity" (lol), they were rotated to wild because they were powerful, omnipresent and, most importantly, couldn't be nerfed. The questlines can be nerfed and I 100% guarantee most people by the time next rotation comes around will be whining about something completely different from questlines, because that's always how this works. Recency bias is a bitch.
5
These threads are always a lot of fun, I'll admit. It always devolves into a bunch of nonsense between the hearthstone equivalent of flat-earthers and people who have at least a bare understanding of how chance and statistics work.
It's amazing how much these people really resemble flat-earthers, antivax, qanon etc etc. The pattern is eerily similar. Just make a frankly preposterous point that goes against logic and actual objective facts and when asked to prove in some way shape or form said point, hide back behind "well if you've played half a game, you'd know hearthstone was rigged", "oh, you're asking me proof but why don't you give me some" and the evergreen "THE PATENT OMG SOMEONE THINK OF THE PATENT".
It's 100% pointless to argue with these people. It's not that they lack understanding of what "random" is or how statistics work (which they most assuredly do) but that they lack the basic premise that should be at the base of a discussion...rational thought. Their belligerent refusal to understand what they're arguing about also can't help matters that much.
I was even going to go on a tirade explaining how if there was any "rigging" we'd know but...what's the point. It's like me trying to tell my cat not to climb the plant, I may shout as much as I want but the cat isn't able to understand me and does what she wants because that's how she is.
So please do carry on with the conspiracies, but I would like to ask you to at the very least come up with something new or a bit more original because the Hanon points are really...stale. A few reptilians, a kabal or two and maybe the NWO would make things more interesting.
1
Try reno evenlock, seems to be performing exceedingly well against everything
0
Why on earth would you want a 2 mana deal 2 damage shuffle a pointless 2 mana deal 3 in your deck? Unless your whole deck was based on exactly card draw and spell power? Ignite is garbage if it doesn't fit exactly with what the deck wants to do, in the same way that no druid deck in wild runs jade just because "wow, such value". Clunking your future draws for a pointless 2 mana card that scales awfully slowly is a terrible plan.
Uh...you realise quest mage is tier 3...right? What you're saying it ping mage is just as good as quest mage then.
2
Love to see illucia absolutely obliterated from orbit, what an amazing day.
0
You play the most generic hyper aggro garbage deck in odd dh and you're sick of the hyper-aggro rubbish? Did you fall off a chair and hit your head when you were a young lad or what?
0
Quest priest has the exact same winrate quest mage has (47%), and this is according to internal blizzard data, not "my incredibly relevant personal experience on ladder" (https://twitter.com/sky_tding/status/1435452830748344320/photo/1) . As to how, it's not particularly difficult, if a priest lands robes of protection and/or the 4/6 watchpost what do you think a mage can do exactly? In no way shape or form is it a good matchup but priests hardly roll over.