I think the main issue with hunter as a class is if hunter can consistantly win early game against almost every class (as it was when undertaker wasnt nerfed) hunter becomes OP class dominating the whole ladder. CotW is a late game card which doesnt support hunters in early game. Hunter rn still loses early game to shamans, zoo, sometimes even druid. Grandma isnt that annoying and good at early trades like haunted creaper, huntress is a bit combo-ish. Here we came to the point where CotW is good (OP) only against control and midrange decks that doesnt break the meta and archetypes balance.
I'd say it's Garrosh for portrait, but Valeera's hero power is the best and overall, i'd put Valeera's portrait after Garrosh, so if i'd summ all it's Valeera to me
For Deadly Poison, I guess I always thought of it as "Combo with Blade Flurry for big AoE", so I didn't take into account it's use for early board control.
I was inspired with the ressurect of Miracle and today i was playing this deck (with some changes) on EU ladder (rank 4) and want to share my experience here.
First of all, it's a good deck to play, not trash, but sometimes inconcistent with draws. I cut all cards which seems not to fit (psycho-tron didn't do much for me, dark iron skulker is not a spell, and it's good when you are on a board only, journey from below doesn't fit) and include old staff like deadly poison (good at early board control and extra dmg).
Second, i decided to cut farseeres for the second FoK, just because +3 hp don't look like doing any difference vs. smorc decks (i met only against shamans today), and FoK is good vs, zoolock. Also it can draw you something good when you're looking for answer.
Third, Match-ups. Warriors: i played against C'thun warrior, and won with big vancleef, but i was a bit lucky he didn't draw any answer to it, and against patron(!) - won too. Shaman is pretty bad, i won once and lost 4 or 5 times. Priest is good match-up, play like oil-rogue basically. Zoolock is 50/50 to me right now without Blade Flurry. just contol the board and wait for burst. Druid is a bit not bad, if you play minion after minion after minion and remove his staff (busrt usually is not needed in this match). This is the version i played
I don't think that thaurissan needed that badly in this deck. I mean, even if you reduce leeroy or auctioneer isnt it slow to give up early board control? Maybe double SI instead of 1 journey and 1 shiv? psychotron is very interesting tech choice i think
But my fears are healing. Basically now we have apothecary+prep+vanish combo, but we can't use it on an empty board with brann for example to recover, and it's bad against burst decks like face shamans and face hunters. Oh man, now i think that our efforts are kind of meaningless...
What do you think about shadow strikes? And what does psycho-tron do for us? I see even that 3 mana 2/4 taunt is even better here. To me psycho-tron is a bit late vs. Aggro.
0
10 actually
0
I think the main issue with hunter as a class is if hunter can consistantly win early game against almost every class (as it was when undertaker wasnt nerfed) hunter becomes OP class dominating the whole ladder. CotW is a late game card which doesnt support hunters in early game. Hunter rn still loses early game to shamans, zoo, sometimes even druid. Grandma isnt that annoying and good at early trades like haunted creaper, huntress is a bit combo-ish. Here we came to the point where CotW is good (OP) only against control and midrange decks that doesnt break the meta and archetypes balance.
0
I'd say it's Garrosh for portrait, but Valeera's hero power is the best and overall, i'd put Valeera's portrait after Garrosh, so if i'd summ all it's Valeera to me
0
And for Auctioneers too!
0
I was inspired with the ressurect of Miracle and today i was playing this deck (with some changes) on EU ladder (rank 4) and want to share my experience here.
First of all, it's a good deck to play, not trash, but sometimes inconcistent with draws. I cut all cards which seems not to fit (psycho-tron didn't do much for me, dark iron skulker is not a spell, and it's good when you are on a board only, journey from below doesn't fit) and include old staff like deadly poison (good at early board control and extra dmg).
Second, i decided to cut farseeres for the second FoK, just because +3 hp don't look like doing any difference vs. smorc decks (i met only against shamans today), and FoK is good vs, zoolock. Also it can draw you something good when you're looking for answer.
Third, Match-ups. Warriors: i played against C'thun warrior, and won with big vancleef, but i was a bit lucky he didn't draw any answer to it, and against patron(!) - won too. Shaman is pretty bad, i won once and lost 4 or 5 times. Priest is good match-up, play like oil-rogue basically. Zoolock is 50/50 to me right now without Blade Flurry. just contol the board and wait for burst. Druid is a bit not bad, if you play minion after minion after minion and remove his staff (busrt usually is not needed in this match). This is the version i played
0
Maybe the second journey or fan.
0
I don't think that thaurissan needed that badly in this deck. I mean, even if you reduce leeroy or auctioneer isnt it slow to give up early board control? Maybe double SI instead of 1 journey and 1 shiv? psychotron is very interesting tech choice i think
2
extra loot hoarder of course.
0
65 packs, only Shifter Zerus=(
0
Sure man. I hope it will reach some success
0
why not using Sen'jin then?
But my fears are healing. Basically now we have apothecary+prep+vanish combo, but we can't use it on an empty board with brann for example to recover, and it's bad against burst decks like face shamans and face hunters. Oh man, now i think that our efforts are kind of meaningless...
0
But belcher was never used in mill-rogue decks.
0
Oh man, laughed so hard
0
What do you think about shadow strikes? And what does psycho-tron do for us? I see even that 3 mana 2/4 taunt is even better here. To me psycho-tron is a bit late vs. Aggro.