I have yet to acquire two Frost Giants, but I've been having surprisingly good results with Mountain Giant. You can end up having a turn 4 giant if you have it and Burgle in your opening hand.
By "a return" I simply mean that I never really see Nourish played that often. If this card ends up being really good, we will probably see more of Nourish in the future.
I'm interested to see how this card goes. If it is run, I expect the deck to have a lot of draw in it as well. Hey, we may even see Nourish make a return! :P
Am I the only one that feels the "holding a dragon" requirement isn't really that big of a deal? With all the big legionaries being dragons, it seems that all cards will this mechanic will be able to function quite frequently.
I don't have Foe Reaper 4000, so I replaced him with Kel'Thuzad. Honestly, I find him to be more helpful than the Reaper at times. He helps maintain your board control while destroying your opponent's board. The only card you don't actually want him to ressurect is Vol'jin, mostly because he comes back as a 6/2 :P
With all the Hunters out there, I pretty much reserved to allways keeping board clear in my opening hand. For example, I always keep Holy Nova while I'm a Priest playing Hunter.
I don't really find this to be a "terrible" card per say. At worst, you just draw a card (think of it as Life Tapping). At its mid, you play a free beast that would cost the same despite playing Call Pet. At its best, you get ridiculousness like a 4 mana King Krush.
2
I have yet to acquire two Frost Giants, but I've been having surprisingly good results with Mountain Giant. You can end up having a turn 4 giant if you have it and Burgle in your opening hand.
0
By "a return" I simply mean that I never really see Nourish played that often. If this card ends up being really good, we will probably see more of Nourish in the future.
3
I'm interested to see how this card goes. If it is run, I expect the deck to have a lot of draw in it as well. Hey, we may even see Nourish make a return! :P
0
Played this card against a Druid as a Paladin with a board full of recruits. Got Soul of the Forest. The value.
13
The awkward moment when both you and your opponent are playing demonlock and you both have this card XD
2
Am I the only one that feels the "holding a dragon" requirement isn't really that big of a deal? With all the big legionaries being dragons, it seems that all cards will this mechanic will be able to function quite frequently.
0
I don't have Foe Reaper 4000, so I replaced him with Kel'Thuzad. Honestly, I find him to be more helpful than the Reaper at times. He helps maintain your board control while destroying your opponent's board. The only card you don't actually want him to ressurect is Vol'jin, mostly because he comes back as a 6/2 :P
0
With all the Hunters out there, I pretty much reserved to allways keeping board clear in my opening hand. For example, I always keep Holy Nova while I'm a Priest playing Hunter.
6
Am I the only one that really really REALLY wants to double Faceless this?
0
I don't really find this to be a "terrible" card per say. At worst, you just draw a card (think of it as Life Tapping). At its mid, you play a free beast that would cost the same despite playing Call Pet. At its best, you get ridiculousness like a 4 mana King Krush.
4
Am I the only one thinking about this card plus Lorewalker Cho? XD