• 0

    posted a message on Cannot get past Rank 20 and 19
    Quote from Aether_lackey >>

    Seriously, at rank 20 you should be beating people using gimmick decks, likle 30 legends. If you can't progress you should seriously stop playing the way you currently are and start learning from your mistakes, maybe even watch the starter player videos trump posted on his youtube channel. 

     Everyone netdecks now dude.  Finding a non tier 1/2 deck at any rank is really uncommon.  So no, you can't win with gimmicks unless you just get amazing draws and your opponent doesn't.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on What am I doing wrong?

    That's a consequence of aggro decks.  They have no draw power.  If you want a deck where you're more in control I suggest something else :/

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on The Significance of the 2017 Rotation

    I'm scared for the future of the mage class.  I forgot exactly how many important cards were leaving.  Their top 3 decks are getting wrecked hard with this next rotation.

    I want to believe this could be addressed but when you look at the other classes there's going to be a lot of gaps to fill in deck types and that's a lot to fit into one themed expansion and still make things fresh.  A class is gonna get the short end of the stick, the question is which one.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Which deck requires most skill?

    Reno priest/mage or freeze mage.  Lots of decisions to make that could win or lose you the game.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Dragon Decks, a missed opportunity.

    If you get wrecked by dragon priest play a reno deck.

    Though if it makes you feel better dragon's are losing a lot of support after the rotation.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on There has never been a 3 mana dragon
    Quote from KitsuneRTC >>
    Quote from AkashaTV >>

    Um what? Plenty of people want Aggro, there is a reason theres tons of aggro on ladder.

     

    Taking aggro out of the game would make for a really bad game. There have to be differing archetypes. Controlstone would be uninstallstone.

     The best games are mid range vs mid range. Obviously sometimes that turns into curvestone but those tend to be the hardest but non lengthy games in the meta.
     Reno deck vs Reno deck is pretty fun, best 30 minute games ever.

    On topic I'd love to see a dragon themed expansion or at least some dragon support.  I've always wanted a dragon tempo mage deck (that didn't suck) 
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Do Jade Decks feel wrong to you?
    Quote from Kaioxys >>

    It's entirely stupid The jade golems are usually treated as if they only cost 2 stats. So only the first Jade card played is fair. But after that everything is unbalanced. There's an easy way to see if a card is fair. If you could put as many of a card in your deck as you wanted, would it be overpowered? The answer is obviously YES when you imagine a deck where every card is Jade Idol.

     Except you can't outright build a jade deck of just jade idol.  You can certainly get to the point where your deck only contains Jade idol but the amount of setup it takes is insane.  Even then you're out of card draw.  Jade druid isn't that bad.  You just have to play it appropriately and I've noticed people don't like to adapt.  Personally jade rogues scare me more because they have a much better early game.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Control and aggro
    Quote from RedSeeker >>

    Mill Rogue: Who really gives a crap about this. It's going to die in the next rotation anyways.

    Control Warrior: This will also die out in the next rotation.

    Handlock/Giant Handlock: This died when Molten Giant got nerfed.

    Now lets get to the real problem here. Pirate Warrior literally killed 3 classes. After Reno rotates out, Warlock will be unplayable. Mage will also be unplayable and Hunter is already unplayable.

     Ummmm what?  Of those 3 you mentioned only 1 was considered competitive and that was "killed" by Jade Druid, not pirate warrior

    Seriously why is everyone still freaking out about this?
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Should we expect to see a swamp Ooze nerf some time in the near future?

    Not to mention swamp ooze usually only removes one durability from a weapon when you take into account the likelihood you've already taken a weapon hit.  It's not a broken card in any way, and it's only effective against 4/9 classes.  5 if one of the others plays Medivh

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Do Jade Decks feel wrong to you?
    Quote from hammshake >>

    My biggest problem with jade decks is that it not necessarily their power, it's that it single handedly killed any sort of control decks (besides reno) which is causing this aggro pirate cancer meta that we have

     That's only because Control decks had become so reliant on fatigue.  They just need to tweak their decklists to combat the druids
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Please Blizzard fix the alternative Golden Heroes #3

    Am i the only one looking at those pics thinking the white looks better?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Fastest lethals in HS? Turn 3 Rogue vs Pirate Warrior!

    Lap Dogs, All of You!

    That was awesome

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Do Jade Decks feel wrong to you?
    Quote from GhostTrickx1 >>
    Quote from Aegis24 >>

    People speak of Jade match-ups as some sort of strange new strategy.  Omg you have to be aggressive, no fair.  Congrats, that's how you play card games, exploit a weakness.  There's nothing "wrong" about it.  Each deck type has specific strength and weaknesses.  Personally I'm glad Jade is pushing fatigue decks out of the meta.  The Control Warrior decks were getting so very boring, it's about time they adapt their deck lists.  I'm disappointed tempo mages got diddly squat but Reno mage is quite fun even if it is a bit weaker vs reno priest and warlock.

     What does tempo mage actually need at the moment? Flamewaker is one of the strongest cards in the game, they don't need anything. Control mage/reno on the other hand was struggling. Good on them for finally getting support despite it easily being the weakest kabal deck.
     The deck list has been pretty static for a while now.  I was hoping for something to shake it up a little, especially since next expansion is going to see flamewaker, thaurissan, flaming torch, and arcane blast leave.  But, it didn't get anything interesting save maybe greater arcane missiles with spell damage potential.  That means it'll need even more help next expansion to continue being a viable deck.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Standard format has failed to deliver

    You can't look at deck win rates as see the whole picture either.  That's the average of many many players of all different skill levels and isn't 100% representative of a deck's potential.  Especially when you consider things like pirate warrior which most sane people agree right now isn't going to last and is merely taken advantage of unrefined decks as everyone experiments with the expansion.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Help Needed for Renolock
    Quote from RNGxGod >>

    good three drops for Renolock:

    For aggro you can put a Second-Rate Bruiser as possible 3-drop. All these cards can be a substitute for these 3-Drops you are missing.  If that is not enough, post your decklist and we will find you your substitutes, but that's the fun part of Hearthstone to figure out your decks yourself

     This, I'm trying so hard not to netdeck hahaha.  I want to tweak my reno mage deck on my own
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.