"because democracy basically means government by the people, of the people, for the people, but the people are retarded. So let us say: government by the retarded, for the retarded, of the retarded." - Osho Rajneesh
Jesus Christ, you are so ungreteful!!! >:( They gave you FIVE legendaries for free this time and even so you are still complaining about silly bad luck. Calm down, dude...
he paid alot of money for these packs but got shit reward. Instead of supporting him you defend this garbage rng in packs.. 👎
Jesus Christ, you are so ungreteful!!! >:( They gave you FIVE legendaries for free this time and even so you are still complaining about silly bad luck. Calm down, dude...
and fuck you too
Damn... If I defend Blizzard, I'm shit. If I do the opposite (as usual), I'm still shit. WTF is wrong with you, people???
stop being a post hunter and being rude problem fixed
I'm just stating the truth. Five legendaries for free is a lot!!! Yeah, OP only got four legendaries from packs so far, but guess what??? He has NINE legendaries now...
so you saying he should be happy to get 10 legendary when free to play players get more with 50 packs? you just a troll
Really? Opening more than four legendaries in 50 packs is not the norm. What kind of argument is that? And of course, stop calling me a troll, post hunter, rude or whatever. Thank you!!!
3 legendary in 142 packs is far from normal... as you can see many free to play players get 3-7 legendarys in 50 packs
First, OP got 4 legendaries in 142 packs, not 3. And second, you need to open on average 85 packs to obtain 5 legendaries (5 - 25 - 45 - 65 - 85). Oh, and please, do not let me explain you the math, it's very simple.
Jesus Christ, you are so ungreteful!!! >:( They gave you FIVE legendaries for free this time and even so you are still complaining about silly bad luck. Calm down, dude...
Honestly, as rude as you might be from time to time, I usually feel the same sentiment as you. In this case however, I do not. You're missing the obvious fact that Blizzard also included 5 MORE Legendaries this expansion. Yes, they gave them for free, but that didn't change the amount of Legendaries this expansion has left to collect.
It also doesn't change the fact that OP might have witnessed the worst RNG possible in pack openings. He's not being ungrateful, he's angry, and he has every right to be displeased. Blizzard will not care, but he has a right to voice his opinion on something that is surely abysmal, by any standards.
So, instead of replying on how ungrateful he is, leave it alone. I remember a certain post of yours wondering why you received warnings from mods, and how we should share tips on how to better our behavior and experience on this forum. And this, my dear Sherman, is exactly something you can easily avoid.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Dad, husband, gamer, fueled by coffee.
Currently playing Dragon Galakrond Priest, Dragon Galakrond Warrior and Highlander Dragon Hunter.
Jesus Christ, you are so ungreteful!!! >:( They gave you FIVE legendaries for free this time and even so you are still complaining about silly bad luck. Calm down, dude...
he paid alot of money for these packs but got shit reward. Instead of supporting him you defend this garbage rng in packs.. 👎
Jesus Christ, you are so ungreteful!!! >:( They gave you FIVE legendaries for free this time and even so you are still complaining about silly bad luck. Calm down, dude...
and fuck you too
Damn... If I defend Blizzard, I'm shit. If I do the opposite (as usual), I'm still shit. WTF is wrong with you, people???
stop being a post hunter and being rude problem fixed
I'm just stating the truth. Five legendaries for free is a lot!!! Yeah, OP only got four legendaries from packs so far, but guess what??? He has NINE legendaries now...
so you saying he should be happy to get 10 legendary when free to play players get more with 50 packs? you just a troll
Really? Opening more than four legendaries in 50 packs is not the norm. What kind of argument is that? And of course, stop calling me a troll, post hunter, rude or whatever. Thank you!!!
3 legendary in 142 packs is far from normal... as you can see many free to play players get 3-7 legendarys in 50 packs
First, OP got 4 legendaries in 142 packs, not 3. And second, you need to open on average 85 packs to obtain 5 legendaries (5 - 25 - 45 - 65 - 85). Oh, and please, do not let me explain you the math, it's very simple.
sorry 132 packs is 3 legendary since i removed the first 10 packs + he got a golden legendary so he got 10... but 3 legendary is 44 packs per legendary dont come here and tell me he should be happy about 44 packs per legendary
You're missing the obvious fact that Blizzard also included 5 MORE Legendaries this expansion. Yes, they gave them for free, but that didn't change the amount of Legendaries this expansion has left to collect.
Not trying to be rude, but you are the one missing the obvious fact that the 5 legendaries they gave for free this time are more powerful and useful than average. And of course, you need to collect only a few legendaries to remain competitive, and such a thing is really not that hard... -.-
I bought the 100 packs bundle and I collected 42 packs more.
By 142 packs I just got 4 legendaries and 1 was also guarranteed in the fist 10, I just want to share with you guys, it can happen to you aswell.
I just finish to buy cards.
You gambled on lootboxes and lost. It isgambling, pure and simple. I used to buy packs, in the early days of Hearthstone, but I learned my lesson. You should too.
Imagine paying hundreds of dollars for lootboxes for an unbalanced, high-RNG mess, which markets itself as an "esport". OMEGALUL
You're missing the obvious fact that Blizzard also included 5 MORE Legendaries this expansion. Yes, they gave them for free, but that didn't change the amount of Legendaries this expansion has left to collect.
Not trying to be rude, but you are the one missing the obvious fact that the 5 legendaries they gave for free this time are more powerful and useful than average. And of course, you need to collect only a few legendaries to remain competitive, and such a thing is really not that hard... -.-
They didn't just give players "5 legendaries". That is a gross over-simplification. They increased the number of legendaries in the set by 5, and then gave players the excess. it is very different, because the cost of the set stayed the same.
You're missing the obvious fact that Blizzard also included 5 MORE Legendaries this expansion. Yes, they gave them for free, but that didn't change the amount of Legendaries this expansion has left to collect.
Not trying to be rude, but you are the one missing the obvious fact that the 5 legendaries they gave for free this time are more powerful and useful than average. And of course, you need to collect only a few legendaries to remain competitive, and such a thing is really not that hard... -.-
They didn't just give players "5 legendaries". That is a gross over-simplification. They increased the number of legendaries in the set by 5, and then gave players the excess. it is very different, because the cost of the set stayed the same.
No, the cost of the set did not stay the same. That is far from reality. You are forgetting the fact many cards of Descent of Dragons are built around those five legendaries they gave for free, my friend. ;)
Jesus Christ, you are so ungreteful!!! >:( They gave you FIVE legendaries for free this time and even so you are still complaining about silly bad luck. Calm down, dude...
he paid alot of money for these packs but got shit reward. Instead of supporting him you defend this garbage rng in packs.. 👎
Jesus Christ, you are so ungreteful!!! >:( They gave you FIVE legendaries for free this time and even so you are still complaining about silly bad luck. Calm down, dude...
and fuck you too
Damn... If I defend Blizzard, I'm shit. If I do the opposite (as usual), I'm still shit. WTF is wrong with you, people???
stop being a post hunter and being rude problem fixed
I'm just stating the truth. Five legendaries for free is a lot!!! Yeah, OP only got four legendaries from packs so far, but guess what??? He has NINE legendaries now...
so you saying he should be happy to get 10 legendary when free to play players get more with 50 packs? you just a troll
Really? Opening more than four legendaries in 50 packs is not the norm. What kind of argument is that? And of course, stop calling me a troll, post hunter, rude or whatever. Thank you!!!
I wouldn't sweat it. Some people just feel entitled to win when playing the lottery then get upset when they don't. And if you point it out, the trolls will come to defend them by throwing out insults because their argument is trash.
Jesus Christ, you are so ungreteful!!! >:( They gave you FIVE legendaries for free this time and even so you are still complaining about silly bad luck. Calm down, dude...
he paid alot of money for these packs but got shit reward. Instead of supporting him you defend this garbage rng in packs.. 👎
Jesus Christ, you are so ungreteful!!! >:( They gave you FIVE legendaries for free this time and even so you are still complaining about silly bad luck. Calm down, dude...
and fuck you too
Damn... If I defend Blizzard, I'm shit. If I do the opposite (as usual), I'm still shit. WTF is wrong with you, people???
stop being a post hunter and being rude problem fixed
I'm just stating the truth. Five legendaries for free is a lot!!! Yeah, OP only got four legendaries from packs so far, but guess what??? He has NINE legendaries now...
so you saying he should be happy to get 10 legendary when free to play players get more with 50 packs? you just a troll
Really? Opening more than four legendaries in 50 packs is not the norm. What kind of argument is that? And of course, stop calling me a troll, post hunter, rude or whatever. Thank you!!!
I wouldn't sweat it. Some people just feel entitled to win when playing the lottery then get upset when they don't. And if you point it out, the trolls will come to defend them by throwing out insults because their argument is trash.
2 legendaries (1 is the first 10 packs one) and don't tell me that blizz gave me 5 legendaries, coz they increase the numbers of cards in the exp from the usual 135 to 140, so the 5 gifted are just "promo" like Sn1p-Sn4p for example. It's not like Blizz gave us 5 class legendaries so we have only 1 less legendary to collect from the 5 classes involved.
Not counting the fact that in this expansion most of the legendaries are a must for most decks :/
2 legendaries (1 is the first 10 packs one) and don't tell me that blizz gave me 5 legendaries, coz they increase the numbers of cards in the exp from the usual 135 to 140, so the 5 gifted are just "promo" like Sn1p-Sn4p for example. It's not like Blizz gave us 5 class legendaries so we have only 1 less legendary to collect from the 5 classes involved.
Not counting the fact that in this expansion most of the legendaries are a must for most decks :/
No, they are not a "promo" as you said. Many cards from this expansion are built around them. Hell, even the most hated deck right now is f..king Galakrond Shaman, for God's sake!!!
Got 5 legendary in about 35 packs free to play. Sorry bout your luck, but yeah don't spend money on this game
i got 9 legendaries with 100 packs
"because democracy basically means government by the people, of the people, for the people, but the people are retarded. So let us say: government by the retarded, for the retarded, of the retarded." - Osho Rajneesh
Well youre dumb fuck rich guy. Go kys
First, OP got 4 legendaries in 142 packs, not 3. And second, you need to open on average 85 packs to obtain 5 legendaries (5 - 25 - 45 - 65 - 85). Oh, and please, do not let me explain you the math, it's very simple.
Honestly, as rude as you might be from time to time, I usually feel the same sentiment as you. In this case however, I do not. You're missing the obvious fact that Blizzard also included 5 MORE Legendaries this expansion. Yes, they gave them for free, but that didn't change the amount of Legendaries this expansion has left to collect.
It also doesn't change the fact that OP might have witnessed the worst RNG possible in pack openings. He's not being ungrateful, he's angry, and he has every right to be displeased. Blizzard will not care, but he has a right to voice his opinion on something that is surely abysmal, by any standards.
So, instead of replying on how ungrateful he is, leave it alone. I remember a certain post of yours wondering why you received warnings from mods, and how we should share tips on how to better our behavior and experience on this forum. And this, my dear Sherman, is exactly something you can easily avoid.
Dad, husband, gamer, fueled by coffee.
Currently playing Dragon Galakrond Priest, Dragon Galakrond Warrior and Highlander Dragon Hunter.
sorry 132 packs is 3 legendary since i removed the first 10 packs + he got a golden legendary so he got 10... but 3 legendary is 44 packs per legendary dont come here and tell me he should be happy about 44 packs per legendary
I named my toxic reinforcement hunter deck "hearthpwn community" due to threads like this
If you don't know how to have fun or create decks with the legendary ones that touched you, then why do you play?
Goodbye, don't have fun then.
One less thing to worry about for Blizz.
Dead but dreaming
Not trying to be rude, but you are the one missing the obvious fact that the 5 legendaries they gave for free this time are more powerful and useful than average. And of course, you need to collect only a few legendaries to remain competitive, and such a thing is really not that hard... -.-
You gambled on lootboxes and lost. It is gambling, pure and simple. I used to buy packs, in the early days of Hearthstone, but I learned my lesson. You should too.
Imagine paying hundreds of dollars for lootboxes for an unbalanced, high-RNG mess, which markets itself as an "esport". OMEGALUL
They didn't just give players "5 legendaries". That is a gross over-simplification. They increased the number of legendaries in the set by 5, and then gave players the excess. it is very different, because the cost of the set stayed the same.
No, the cost of the set did not stay the same. That is far from reality. You are forgetting the fact many cards of Descent of Dragons are built around those five legendaries they gave for free, my friend. ;)
I wouldn't sweat it. Some people just feel entitled to win when playing the lottery then get upset when they don't. And if you point it out, the trolls will come to defend them by throwing out insults because their argument is trash.
Sad, but true.
2 legendaries (1 is the first 10 packs one) and don't tell me that blizz gave me 5 legendaries, coz they increase the numbers of cards in the exp from the usual 135 to 140, so the 5 gifted are just "promo" like Sn1p-Sn4p for example.
It's not like Blizz gave us 5 class legendaries so we have only 1 less legendary to collect from the 5 classes involved.
Not counting the fact that in this expansion most of the legendaries are a must for most decks :/
Follow me, i do some sexy/lewd arts:
IG: @ewil.inside
FB: Ewil Art
DA: ewilinside
No, they are not a "promo" as you said. Many cards from this expansion are built around them. Hell, even the most hated deck right now is f..king Galakrond Shaman, for God's sake!!!
You can see my post on Blizzard forum get big attention but no answer from blue post. I buy 103 pack and get 2 legendary.
https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/hearthstone/t/i-buy-103-packs-and-get-2-legendary/19921
7 out of 86 free packs and gold only. I’ve spent tons of money since gadgetzan, haven’t spent a dime for 4 xpacs.
Best decision I’ve ever made.
Are you stupid? The minimum to get from 103 packs is 3 legends... Why even lie about this, you need some attention? Well you got it.