Hi I'm Wololo#1780, and I want to ask for opinions about which of this somewhat cheap highlander decks I made you think is better against the meta decks now like Tempo Demon Hunter, Highlander Hunter and Warriors, and if they would be viable going for Legend.
Yes they aren't the most optimal obviously but its for the ones who can't or don't want to spent in them, or maybe for old players like myself who look for a challenge haha
Yes they aren't the most optimal obviously but its for the ones who can't or don't want to spent in them, or maybe for old players like myself who look for a challenge haha
You spent 3200 dust on 2 highlander cards. Pretty poor choice if you didn't want to waste more dust. Highlanders are very hard to build on budget, because with limited consistency and cardpool, basically every single card has to be good. But for fun - sure.
The hunter deck is more viable. Paladin may be cheaper to build but it doesn't have a viable highlander list. Your hunter deck can win games just by having dragons and lots of smorc.
The Hunter deck has a lot of the Dragon Interaction and could work until a certain point without a problem.
But compared to the actual strong Highlander Hunter that is out there a lot of the board control stuff is missing, primarly through the interaction of Zixor Prime Buffed and Card Draw through the Rush minions. This is what makes it really strong. You can literally pull the cards you want out of your deck and buff them.
The hunter deck is more viable. Paladin may be cheaper to build but it doesn't have a viable highlander list. Your hunter deck can win games just by having dragons and lots of smorc.
He has Dragon synergies for Pala too, but more importantly Pala at least has board clears.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Hi I'm Wololo#1780, and I want to ask for opinions about which of this somewhat cheap highlander decks I made you think is better against the meta decks now like Tempo Demon Hunter, Highlander Hunter and Warriors, and if they would be viable going for Legend.
1st: Cheaplander Paladin: https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1351473-cheapalander-only-zephrys-and-alex
2nd: Cheaplander Hunter: https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1351475-cheaphuntder-only-zephrys-and-alex
Thanks!
Everybody knows that...
https://hearthcards.ams3.digitaloceanspaces.com/ce/c0/bc/8a/cec0bc8a.png
Both are pretty bad, but if anything Paladin is much easier to build cheaply than Hunter.
Yes they aren't the most optimal obviously but its for the ones who can't or don't want to spent in them, or maybe for old players like myself who look for a challenge haha
Everybody knows that...
https://hearthcards.ams3.digitaloceanspaces.com/ce/c0/bc/8a/cec0bc8a.png
You spent 3200 dust on 2 highlander cards. Pretty poor choice if you didn't want to waste more dust. Highlanders are very hard to build on budget, because with limited consistency and cardpool, basically every single card has to be good. But for fun - sure.
The hunter deck is more viable. Paladin may be cheaper to build but it doesn't have a viable highlander list. Your hunter deck can win games just by having dragons and lots of smorc.
The Hunter deck has a lot of the Dragon Interaction and could work until a certain point without a problem.
But compared to the actual strong Highlander Hunter that is out there a lot of the board control stuff is missing, primarly through the interaction of Zixor Prime Buffed and Card Draw through the Rush minions. This is what makes it really strong. You can literally pull the cards you want out of your deck and buff them.
Primarily bran
He has Dragon synergies for Pala too, but more importantly Pala at least has board clears.