I'm ecstatic Blizzard is publicly traded. It has done wonders for my life, and I wasn't in what you would call "already fortunate" groups in 2007.
Everyone at Blizzard sings a very different tune, but I'm sure you know what's what better than them. Either way, it turned out wonderfully and there's no particular reason to believe things would be better in an alternate history. That, btw, is assuming alternate facts.
Thank you for the compliment though.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.
Well, you should fill legal complaint, because this is really serious issue.
I do remember when I was signing all the documents, binding me to playing hearthstone. I read it all, every single line, every single note under the lines. And there was that part about full virtual dust refund after changing the virtual card. Therefore, they are obliged to do that and you are in right, OP.
The reality is any changes to a card good or bad can still affect the way a card is played in decks and should warrant a refund of dust. Considering how few of cards get changed within each meta (3-5 max) I don’t think Blizzard is losing out on much at all by providing full refunds.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Lol @ the already fortunate more fortunate.
I'm ecstatic Blizzard is publicly traded. It has done wonders for my life, and I wasn't in what you would call "already fortunate" groups in 2007.
Everyone at Blizzard sings a very different tune, but I'm sure you know what's what better than them. Either way, it turned out wonderfully and there's no particular reason to believe things would be better in an alternate history. That, btw, is assuming alternate facts.
Thank you for the compliment though.
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.
I think that Blizzard should keep records of who crafted what cards.
Players who CRAFT cards that get nerfed should get refunded.
Players who packed cards that get nerfed should get squat.
Anger is the punishment we give ourselves for someone else's mistake.
The reason why they took the Elemental tag away from Ixlid, Fungal Lord isn't because of elemental synergy. It's to stop it from being tutored with Sandbinder. This along with Juicy Psychmelon, Countess Ashmore, and Twig of the World Tree would be way too consistent of a combo to draw in Malygos Druid.
Well, you should fill legal complaint, because this is really serious issue.
I do remember when I was signing all the documents, binding me to playing hearthstone. I read it all, every single line, every single note under the lines. And there was that part about full virtual dust refund after changing the virtual card. Therefore, they are obliged to do that and you are in right, OP.
I just feel it's very subjective and cheap. Blizzard is setting a precedent that they are unreliable and inconsistent, in my own opinion.
The reality is any changes to a card good or bad can still affect the way a card is played in decks and should warrant a refund of dust. Considering how few of cards get changed within each meta (3-5 max) I don’t think Blizzard is losing out on much at all by providing full refunds.