I just opened a Golden King Mukla in a pack. I'm in no rush to make a move, but my gut is saying to DE it for so that I can craft more of the core cards I might want.
I actually haven't DE'd much of anything that wasn't extra yet (except Wisp...that always goes). The Beastmight go eventually. I'll probably play around a bit with King Mukla and then when/if I choose what to craft next, if I feel like I don't need the King, he'll go too.
I just opened a Golden King Mukla in a pack. I'm in no rush to make a move, but my gut is saying to DE it for so that I can craft more of the core cards I might want.
My second golden legendary was mukla, and I kept him (because I don't like disenchanting cards). I think if you are comfortable with your collection, you should keep him. Otherwise you can disenchant him.
Make Hyped's Frozen Banana Midrange Hunter deck! Mukla is the only legendary needed. Mukla is also good in aggro paladin as it combos amazingly well with Divine Favor. Aggro Mill Rogue uses Mukla, but without Edwin that deck is weak.
I've pulled Mukla 3 times, twice golden. What I do with legendaries is keep the golden versions until I pull the normal version. You'll quickly reach a point where you'll REALLY regret DEing legendaries for Rares and Commons. You'll open 20+ packs before you pull a legendary usually. That's a LOT of duplicate rares.
Thanks for the feedback. I really play a little bit of every class except Druid and Rogue (just can't get into them right now). I think I'll hold on to him for now until there is something big that I know I need/want.
I just opened a Golden King Mukla in a pack. I'm in no rush to make a move, but my gut is saying to DE it for so that I can craft more of the core cards I might want.
Only legendaries I have right now are Leeroy Jenkins, The Beast, Al'Akir the Windlord, and Cenarius.
How usable is King Mukla? I don't really know much about him and have never seen him played.
twitter.com/MattDoc
He's really good in aggro but I would definitely DE him for something much more universal.
Kill the monkey, obtain Ragnaros.
Or make something else, but it's worth DEing a gold one.
GLORIOUS PRIEST MASTER RACE
wow, u did not DE The Beast but ask what to do with King Mukla ???? Just DE The Beast and leave the King Mukla.
I actually haven't DE'd much of anything that wasn't extra yet (except Wisp...that always goes). The Beastmight go eventually. I'll probably play around a bit with King Mukla and then when/if I choose what to craft next, if I feel like I don't need the King, he'll go too.
twitter.com/MattDoc
What class and deck do you enjoy playing the most?
Have you seen Flood's excellent Legendary Crafting Guide?
My second golden legendary was mukla, and I kept him (because I don't like disenchanting cards). I think if you are comfortable with your collection, you should keep him. Otherwise you can disenchant him.
I disenchanted golden mukla and I really regret it. It's a very fun card, especially with cho, and has a place in viable decks.
Make Hyped's Frozen Banana Midrange Hunter deck! Mukla is the only legendary needed. Mukla is also good in aggro paladin as it combos amazingly well with Divine Favor. Aggro Mill Rogue uses Mukla, but without Edwin that deck is weak.
I've pulled Mukla 3 times, twice golden. What I do with legendaries is keep the golden versions until I pull the normal version. You'll quickly reach a point where you'll REALLY regret DEing legendaries for Rares and Commons. You'll open 20+ packs before you pull a legendary usually. That's a LOT of duplicate rares.
He's played a ton in rush/aggro decks (Especially Backspace Rogue) and somewhat in zoo. I would keep him. He isn't Millhouse Manastorm.
Thanks for the feedback. I really play a little bit of every class except Druid and Rogue (just can't get into them right now). I think I'll hold on to him for now until there is something big that I know I need/want.
twitter.com/MattDoc
That's a nice decision. Congrats on golden legendary btw :D
Thanks!
twitter.com/MattDoc