Elemental Shaman 80% WR
- Last updated Apr 7, 2017 (Un'Goro Launch)
- Edit
- |
Wild
- 22 Minions
- 6 Spells
- 2 Weapons
- Deck Type: Ranked Deck
- Deck Archetype: Midrange Shaman
- Crafting Cost: 4140
- Dust Needed: Loading Collection
- Created: 4/6/2017 (Un'Goro Launch)
- RyanS
- Registered User
-
- 5
- 27
- 20
-
Battle Tag:
N/A
-
Region:
N/A
-
Total Deck Rating
988
Link:
BBCode:
Export to
Hey guys here is a video of kiwiinbacon using this decks and explaining about it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dv-o29zvvU
Thanks kiwiinbacon
Rank?
which rank?
So far this deck is pretty much decent but nothing solid especially as you progress in rank. It stands ZERO chance vs the quest rogue deck except you get RNG lucky on the opponent's draw. I have been testing this deck since it is the natural evolution of my favority midrange shaman from the previous expansion. Some key takeouts so far:
1) This deck NEEDS Bloodmage Thalnos. I've lost a lot of games desperately trying to get the spell damage totem in order to clear/handle the board and ended up with that lame 1/1/
2) 4 Cards that heal the same 3 are a waste in my opinion. Current meta is so OTK oriented that 3 extra life are more or less meaningless. The obvious replacements are Jinyu Waterspeaker since Hot Spring Guardian has the Elemental mechanic that can help synergies. I am testing a version where I have replace the above two Jinyu Waterspeaker with 1x Bloodmage Thalnos and 1x Bloodlust that can help manage the board or even provide a finishing opportunity when the opponent is setting up his board for his kill after quest completion
Other possible replacements, as mentioned above would be 1x Tol'vir Stoneshaper since it breaks the tempo of the elemental mechanic with 1x Stone Sentinel that keeps the mechanic active and offers board control
Nearly no early game
Meh I tried it a few times and won but it's trash vs quest rogue. Won't be top of the meta. Discard zoolock will be.
Nice Deck, fun to play!
I think that this deck needs thalnos so bad...
not enough ppl are playing this :(
Does this deck perform well against quest rogue and pirate warrior?
against quest rogue, you need to get lucky and hope your opponent will not have good draws... otherwise you are dead as any other deck except for aggro decks...
I replaced two jinyu-waterspeaker and two thing-from-below
and added
1.igneous-elemental ( two - added second copy )
2. Spirit echo ( single card )
3. Blood lust ( two copies )
and played a single game and defeated a warrior taunt quest with ease.
and I forgot to save the deck as " RyanS modified " before taking screenshot.
Now I'll rename it.
Thanks RyanS. Great deck.
Without early burst Rogue always wins versus this deck. Rogue seems to be the only problem.
Mage is never a problem if we play without mistakes.
Only Rouge should consider to be Nerf or else we are breakfast.
Maybe Shaman will also be Nerf if Rouge is, why because Shaman is unstoppable if Rogue is a goner.
dnt have [card]Kalimos, Primal Lord[/card] ? no problem , just exchange it with Magma Rager and you wont win a single game
I guarantee it :D
no srsly this deck is good , i liked it alot and beated most of decks ( even Quest Rouge ! )
i just added 1 Blood Lust to have sense or aggression
+ [card] Stone Sentinel[/card] cuz i almost had elemental played last turn and its synergy is rly good
the [card]Servant of Kalimos [/card] rng however played a big role in my winning
so far i got 2 Stone Sentinel and 1extra [card]Kalimos, Primal Lord[/card] which made me win
thnx man for this wonderful deck
I think that Bloodlust is a must for this deck; the propensity to build up a big board with the combination of totems and 1/2s, as well as the 1/1 kalimos option, feel too good to justify not running it in a meta where 1/3 of the games or so are contingent about killing your opponent as fast a humanly possible (see: quest rogue and otk mage). Thoughts?
winstreak from 19 to 13 with no bloodlust, bloodlust not needed, i usually dont have more than 3 cards on the board
Why jade claws instead of spirit claws
there really doesn't seem like there's enough spell power in this deck to justify running it, but it's probably viable all the same, albeit not as good as jade claws.
suck deck...
runs out of steam when no azure drakes then no elementals then u wish for topdeck but oh no elemental lol.. cmon
Is Ozruk worth putting in this deck somewhere? I (sadly) opened it.
Ah, lazy people disliking your comment, rather than giving a good answer.
No, Ozruk isn't worth it because he is too weak to spells, and a bit too slow.
ive been running a similar deck, with 2 different cards + ozruk, most of the times i manage to play him, i win
Insta win versus druid, insta win versus hunter, instawin versus shaman if you bait their hex beforehand
Truth is i was very disappointed when i got him, but now i even would like to craft him golden