Hearthpwn

I think this deck lacks Siamat so much.

What would you cut?

Shirvallah, the Tiger as it feels too clunky in this minion heavy deck and lacks bounce back mechanism.

I wouldn't consider cutting Shirvallah, Shirvallah is OP. The deck has 32 mana worth of spells plus Sound the Bells which can be up to 10 mana more - that's enough support to unlock the power of the tiger. Bounce effects are irrelevant - Shirvallah is a super-strong card by itself without Holy Wrath shenanigans. It's Zilliax on steroids.

The weakest card in the list is likely to be Dragonmaw Scorcher, it's too expensive for the effect but it's there as a third equality/shrink ray activator - paladin's two-card board clears need some redundancy I feel. Other cards I would consider cutting are Acolyte of Pain and Khartut Defender.

I put The Curator in it since it has a murloc, a dragon and and a beast. I took off Condessa since I didn't have her. Let's see how it goes

Hah, nice idea! It has two dragons actually - still Countess Ashmore would draw more consistently (and drawing the deathrattles is especially key), but on the other hand Curator has a more defensive body. Let me know how it goes.

Fun/Cool deck here bud!

Thanks for the spotlight man, that's awesome! This is typically how the games pan out against aggro in my experience - they have a small window to put together enough damage before our crazy late game blows them out of the water.

One thing I would do differently - if I don't draw any early game I just drop Zephrys on 2, especially against aggro. It's a body to contest the board, and Wild Growth can be good to accelerate our expensive cards.

OH YEAH!!!  For one second I thought about Zephrys turn 2 but I quickly passed the turn because I thought I had to save him for later.  Wild growth would actually be the nutz you right you right!