• 3

    posted a message on New Hunter Card Revealed: Venomstrike Trap

    We know it doesn't work like noble sacrifice, he's just saying it would be really good (as in, OP) if it did.

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Frozen Throne Mage, Paladin, and Warlock Legendary Death Knight Leaks!

    Compare it to Jaraxxus:

    1- Jaraxxus sets your health to 15, either effectively dealing 15 damage or healing for 14. This always heals for 5.

    2- Jaraxxus allows you to summon a 6/6 for 2 each turn. If your theory is right, this will summon a 3/6 for 2 that freezes each turn.

    3- Jaraxxus give you a 3/8 weapon, Jaina summons a 3/6 that freezes immediatly and the elementals get lifesteal.

     

    Until now, I'd say they are both very similar in power level, and Jaraxxus is good. I think this should be quite alright, at least for a tier 3 deck perhaps.

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on Icecrown Tours - Part 1

    That's the description of Alley Cat right there!

     

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Chillblade Champion

    Or you go face and let the opponent deal with it, making it a 4 mana deal 3 damage to face (Sinister Strike-1 mana), restore 6 health (Flash Heal-1 mana (Holy Light is too bad to count )) and a 3/2 (2 mana in general). Seems alright to me.

    Posted in: Chillblade Champion
  • 3

    posted a message on Primordial Drake

    Abomination is 3 mana cheaper than this guy, I think +4 health and Battlecry instead of Deathratte is a fine trade for playing it 3 turns later.

    Posted in: Primordial Drake
  • 1

    posted a message on Rogue Quest Nerf Incoming! Un'Goro Q&A this Friday!

    Yes

    Posted in: News
  • 3

    posted a message on Twitch Prime Members to Receive Free Hearthstone Loot, Soon

    If I'm selling a piece of candy for 20 thousand dollars and with it I offer a free car, is the car free?

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on Why don't Blizzard buff weak cards?

    It's true that not all cards can be competitive at once, but I think buffing cards is a good way to reduce the difference between Tier 1 and Tier 4 decks, leading the general win-rates closer to 50% and increasing variety, that's why I support buffing bad and unplayable cards to a semi-competitive level. I'm not saying I want enough buffs to make Malygos Rogue or Quest Shaman or Jade Rogue viable in tournaments, but if people are less punished for taking them into the ladder, that adds more variety and as such more fun to the game. 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on Why don't Blizzard buff weak cards?

    I have a whole folder with cards I think should be buffed, including most notably Booty Bay Bodyguard, Stormpike Commando, Priestess of Elune, Felguard, Reckless Rocketeer, Silverback Patriarch, Faceless Behemoth and many more which are simply awful and I can't imagine ever being good.

    As far as why they don't do it, they cite a few reasons, particularly that they want players to feel like they're getting better cards (And make it insultingly impossible to compete with their starter collections), they are afraid of overbuffing cards and it might reduce design space .

    I think it's because they can't be lazy and sell cards like Ice Rager, Evil Heckler, Huge Toad and Pompous Thespian instead of updating old useless cards to be as good as they are.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Stonehill Defender

    Wyrmrest Agent, and Fierce Monkey are class cards, I don't consider them into any Strictly Better discussions since Voidwalker has been better than Goldshire Footman since Beta.

    Posted in: Stonehill Defender
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.