• 5

    posted a message on 99% certain

    Here are how these things usually go: 

    1. Dude plays against a certain deck - in this case: bomb warrior.
    2. Dude loses to the deck a few times.
    3. Dude thinks: "Fucking OP deck. I am gonna wreck them" - in this case: adds Ooze. 
    4. Dude plays ladder again with new confidence and ready to farm bomb warriors.
    5. Dude faces a deck that is not bomb warrior, e.g. Priest, draws his useless Ooze who is just a 2 mana 3/2. 
    6. Annoyed dude plays another ranked game because fuck bomb warrior.
    7. Annoyed dude faces another non-bomb warrior deck, e.g. mage, draws his Ooze and gets enraged because: "BlizzArD HatEs mE" 
    8. Enraged dudes realizes this is a conspiracy, plays an extra game or two to confirm his theory.
    9. Enraged dude seeks conformation on his bia...theory among other fellow dudes, creates a thread on Hearthpwn, exaggerates his numbers, leaves out data from his small data pool, does not get the desired response and quits the thread.

    Cheers

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on What do you believe is the biggest contributing factor to existing players not returning? (POLL)

    Personally, I quit Hearthstone prior to the release of the Scholomance expansion. The main reason I quit Hearthstone was because RNG became too big a factor, and I did not enjoy the player experience anymore. 

    However, the reason I won't come back to the game is: the economy and packs. I have thrown more money into Hearhstone than I'd like to admit, and even so my collection is far from full.

    • It is simply too expensive to catch up. Hearthstone offers little to no help to catch up. There are only two ways to come back: 1) Pay up 2) A major grind. I do not have the patience to grind Hearthstone because the I don't like the player experience enough, so that basically excludes option 2. 
    • Packs! Because even if I do plan on spending money on the game again then the pack system might screw me over. I have bought multiple pre-order deals and 40 pack bundles (50 €!) and often I have not gotten anything out of it. Sure, a bad legendary, a bunch of useless epics and so on. But the cards I need? Nah, better luck next time. It's just tedious to open packs. 

    Compare this to Legends of Runeterra: Great economy, F2P friendly, you buy cards and not packs and so on. I have been able to craft the entire previous expansion (except for a few epics), and I can craft every relevant card of the upcoming expansion. As long as Hearthstone is more of a gamble than a collector’s game, I am out - except for a few game of battegrounds here and there. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on cant buy the adventure for Cleric of Scales

     Contact Blizzard instead of asking for help here.

    https://us.battle.net/support/en/help

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Disapointed in Hearthstone now

    I get where you are coming from. I quit playing Hearthstine prior to Scholomance Acadademy because I didn't like the direction Hearthstone took, and I found a CCG that was more to my liking. I think Hearthstone is a game that is fun to watch Youtube highlights from and frustrating to play. 

    However, instead of creating a post that's just a bunch of salt about various meta decks then stop playing. Do something with your time that you like. You can create threads like these about every meta in Hearthstone (except in the early days), and you can find tons of similar threads in the forums on Hearthpwn. There is nothing new about it; you just don't like this meta.

    Blizzard has powercreeped the hell out of the game, and they will probably continue to do so - unless they release Hearthstone 2. 

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on Blizzard Reduced The Price Of Tavern Pass For The Rest Of The Scholomance Expansion Cycle

    I am pretty sure it's quite popular. Otherwise Blizzard wouldn't put that much energy into it. 

    Fair enough you don't like it. A lot of other people do. Each to their own you know. 

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Hearthstone in the past and today

    I played Hearthstone since release and played up till the release of the lastest expansion. I am done (though I still follow the community and watch it on YT). I agree that RNG is too big factor in the current state of the game. Rogues with lackeys, Priest/Shaman/Mage with random card generation, Druids with crazy high rolls and what not. In the end I didn't even like when I was high rolling: "Oh, I have lost this game. No wait I got a random board clear. GG ez", and it was tilting to be winning until a random generated puzzlebox obliterated my board and gave the opponent minions at the time. 

    I am not saying Hearthstone is trash and I get why people find the RNG funny - and it makes for great YT content. It's just not for my liking. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on WE NEED MORE NERFS!!!! Here's how I would do it!

    You got me. 

    Well played. :D

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Zanitx, The Great Mute

    Neutral mass silence is not the way to go. There is a reason why silence is limited and only some classes have it. 

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • 9

    posted a message on Archmage Williow nerf? No dust refund?

    Mana reduction has a significantly higher impact than a total of 4 stats - especially when we are talking about the late game. 8 mana is lot better than 9 mana. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Demon Hunter is back..........

    This is s troll thread. Don't take the bait. Ignore these kind of threads and they'll go away.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.