Hearthpwn

 I use Twilight Drakes in my dragon priest deck. I had hungry dragons in it but I didn't like dropping them if I didn't have control of the board. I also use the twilight welps but i think in your case I would use the zombie chow because you are also running the auchenai and those two cards have good synergy together and def keep velen's chosen in the deck.

Quote from Cagey75 jump

Quote from HeisinParties jump

Why the hell people can't write properly the card names? 

 Ironically, your first sentence is grammatically off. Should read "Why the hell can't people write the card names properly?" 

And if you're being pedantic, they don't "write" they type. Also it's just spelling mistakes, not grammatical errors. 

 lol

People are already tired of complaining about brawl mode and want a new mode to whine and complain about. 

I totally agree and I bet if you go back and look at the messages of the people whining and complaining they probably whine and complain about everything just ignore them.

Baron geddon I think would be another solid craft especially in an aggro heavy meta he puts in a lot of work. Boom is a good craft of course but with a lot of GPW around the ladder I found him to be a liability. Boom was getting bgh'd and the boom bots became patron multipliers I cut him and haven't looked back but he does literally work in every deck so he is a good craft regardless.

If you have 500 wins with the warrior class the border should be golden also...send blizzard a ticket so they know there is a problem.

I play mostly priest and I will def. be replacing anduin's smug smirking face with whatever comes out!

They already said the hero powers are staying exactly the same so the chances of the blood knights is zero...for now anyway.

Well when he first created the deck he only changed one card which he admits. He probably has only made these other changes because of the flack he has been getting. 

He even admitted he only changed one card from kibblers version 

Quote from RealGambler »

Quote from romangod »

Quote from RealGambler »

Quote from Wildbeat321 »

Main recapping :snip

What do you think instead?

You forgot the "watch recordings" button, as suggested a few time...   As far as I'm concerned, I would not be surprised they implemented this, simply to cut back on tickets (and millions of posts) from people who claimed somebody cheated (ex.: Playing 2 Dr. Boom).   Auto record, keep the last 5 games.  You hit the button, and you can see the replay of those games (and maybe upload it). Would be nice as well for newcomer to see when they played something wrong.

But as much as I would like an auto record game, my vote is for a tournament mode as well.

Record would be a wasted feature to record games you can just download xsplit or obs only a click of a button. Much rather see a tournament mode 

First:  Xsplit or Obs would not work on an Ipad or an Android device.

Two: You have to remember to start the recording all the time.

Three:  You don't want to end up with 12 minutes recording for a 12 minutes match (which take to much space as it is pure video).  With a auto-record built in, the only thing that need to be recorded is small list (cards that were played).  When you want to replay it, the software simply goes through the list, and show each move (with a few seconds delay in between).  So a 12 minutes match can be showed again in 1or 2 minutes, with small delay between each cards.

But again, once again, we are likely getting tournament mode...   Just hope that it is something that will eventually show up.

1. Sadly for mobile devices there really isn't a good answer to the recording matches. 

2. Once you get in the habit of doing it this becomes as second nature as logging into the game itself. Having trouble remembering put a sticky note on your monitor or open up notepad on the computer and leave a sticky on your home screen .

3. You are totally speculating that this is how a record option would be implemented by blizzard in game. I agree if they used your way it would be a lot better and faster to go through games and quickly find key points in a game.

This goes out to anyone that has a desktop or laptop download xsplit or obs if you are interested in recording your games and watching the playback to see where you went wrong. I can't really speak for obs I use xsplit and its very easy to use and free.

Quote from RealGambler »

Quote from Wildbeat321 »

Main recapping :snip

What do you think instead?

You forgot the "watch recordings" button, as suggested a few time...   As far as I'm concerned, I would not be surprised they implemented this, simply to cut back on tickets (and millions of posts) from people who claimed somebody cheated (ex.: Playing 2 Dr. Boom).   Auto record, keep the last 5 games.  You hit the button, and you can see the replay of those games (and maybe upload it). Would be nice as well for newcomer to see when they played something wrong.

But as much as I would like an auto record game, my vote is for a tournament mode as well.

Record would be a wasted feature to record games you can just download xsplit or obs only a click of a button. Much rather see a tournament mode 

Quote from ZumiPhoenix »

Had a priest concede when I coin knife juggler on my hunter

Quote from ZumiPhoenix »

Had a priest concede when I coin knife juggler on my hunter

I seriously doubt knife juggler scared him probably more to do with the class that you were using than the card that you played 

Quote from Slydie »

I honestly think he would still suck if the "hold a dragon" condition was removed.

WHAT ???? Whithout that i would play him above Dr Baal...

Yes, because he is faar too easy to remove for 7 mana, and a lot of aggro-decks do not run any legendaries to kill.

I had this guy played against me once, amd the guy instantly lost next turn, even though he killed my emperor with him.

Sorry, garbage. I trade my Piloted Shredder into your 7-drop all day if you do not believe me...

 

 

Rend came in and did exactly what he was supposed to do lets be honest Rend did not lose that guy the game the game was lost due to what happened before he came in to play. Rend is a tech card and if you are facing a lot of aggro decks in the meta he should be cut similar to how harrison jones and the black knight get teched in and out of decks based on the meta players are facing.

Quote from Pewpewman »

Like people above have said, let's see how the meta shifts before we really pass any judgment. I think it's easy to say statwise that rend is awful. I can give a great example: I was playing ramp druid the other day and I traded my Druid of the Claw in taunt form into something and then played KT to revive it. I was thinking I'd be way ahead because he (a paladin player) already used both an equality so he likely didn't have an answer. Next turn he plays Rend on KT and I was blown back that someone actually plays that card. My amazement was cut short when I ran my 4/6 into his 8/4 and then proceeded to destroy him even further. 

I think Rend will be one of those cards that'll be really hard to play. At 7 mana you can't play much else with it so if the opponent removes it easily that's a huge tempo swing. It's different from BGH obviously because at 3 mana you can play many other things to maintain tempo even if they kill your BGH. 

Rend 2 for 1 you he did his job! Just because the person that played him still lost can't be blamed on Rend he ate up 13 mana worth of cards for only 7 mana so I don't get your example Rend did his job! Bgh by your example could not have killed off either one of your cards and would still be sitting in the person's hand. You're whole example is a big plus for Rend. Rend will only be playable in a dragon themed deck but if you are running dragons then  he should be in the deck too.