whats up with Octosari i dont think one can afford overdrawing too much.
I play a control-bomb warr which has more defense than yours and has no Lackeys but really needs those 2 brawls or 2 warpath against flooding decks (hunter with zuljin, priest with ressurect, murlocs etc), there I see a weakness if you dont draw your Zephrys (as with all highlander decks) and in heavy control you need Archivist or you ll also loose those games
I feel Arena became way more difficult, I had 3x in a row a deck with very low chances of winning. No battlecries no Legendaries no kickass card, and hardly any combos. Sure some time ago it was too easy to draft a almost perfect deck but now I end up too often with 0-2 wins. But maybe just had no luck
I kinda feel like for Rogue, Tess is more important than the Quest, since it gives you a game changer. The games I lost lately were due to too much pressure by small minions (mulocs ie) or even big minions like priest - in both cases the weapon would not help much. But its okay
yea tried previous versions of it and also dont think its viable. if your opponent can handle 2 big boards of you you are done, but for that you need to survive till turn 10 and more. It always reminds me of resurrect priest. yea its fun and you wait for that big move but it rarely pays off.
yea the deck is missing Power, I played a similar Deck but I used Deathrattle cards like Mechanical Whelp or Cairne to have something on the board after shuffle.
Some play this deck with Doomsayers, I kinda like Sense Demons for instaHeal
Hakkar is so weak imo, my worst craft.
First of all you need to draw alot, and with your Hero power you will every time and you end up with less cards than your Opponent (if you didnt benefit from Elek). I had the situation many times where I wanted to generate more cards thru bloods and ended up dying to them before my enemy. Plus if he overdraws the bloods are gone btw. without dmg.
And the bloods are way too slow. Even if he draws them at the end he prob has full life cause theres no other dmg in the deck, while you struggle to survive with the +4hp. So he can survive easily 4-5 turns, but can you? I couldnt most of the time. And then theres the aggro games that are not in your favor.
it is a fun and new deck, but its 50-50 vs control and 25-75 against aggro at best.
I d also say rafaam or Archivist El. not both. Archivist is better because Legendarys dont clear boards und rarely heal you.
3
so you mean the only way to play a meta is to look-up the most popular deck? and be salty that something doesn't work right. I see lol
1
just lost against to deathrattle rogue with shadowstep N'zoth, feels cancerish
1
some interesting additions.
whats up with Octosari i dont think one can afford overdrawing too much.
I play a control-bomb warr which has more defense than yours and has no Lackeys but really needs those 2 brawls or 2 warpath against flooding decks (hunter with zuljin, priest with ressurect, murlocs etc), there I see a weakness if you dont draw your Zephrys (as with all highlander decks) and in heavy control you need Archivist or you ll also loose those games
0
I feel Arena became way more difficult, I had 3x in a row a deck with very low chances of winning. No battlecries no Legendaries no kickass card, and hardly any combos. Sure some time ago it was too easy to draft a almost perfect deck but now I end up too often with 0-2 wins. But maybe just had no luck
0
also Call of the Wild + Zuljin = value
0
Im sure the Secret Pally will be back, anyone remember x-mas tree fun :/
0
I kinda feel like for Rogue, Tess is more important than the Quest, since it gives you a game changer. The games I lost lately were due to too much pressure by small minions (mulocs ie) or even big minions like priest - in both cases the weapon would not help much. But its okay
0
yea tried previous versions of it and also dont think its viable. if your opponent can handle 2 big boards of you you are done, but for that you need to survive till turn 10 and more. It always reminds me of resurrect priest. yea its fun and you wait for that big move but it rarely pays off.
2
so strange i started playing this deck and i didnt face a single Q-shaman. Before that was all I faced, like 10 times in a row Ranks 5-10
thx :)
0
not necessary just use any other mech that sticks..
0
u can sub Rafaam with Archivist, and for Godfrey just use Twisting Nether.
Dorian is kinda unique, dont know if really necessary
-6
why no Q-shaman nerf?
0
cause it respawns, for 3 dmg.
0
yea the deck is missing Power, I played a similar Deck but I used Deathrattle cards like Mechanical Whelp or Cairne to have something on the board after shuffle.
Some play this deck with Doomsayers, I kinda like Sense Demons for instaHeal
Hakkar is so weak imo, my worst craft.
First of all you need to draw alot, and with your Hero power you will every time and you end up with less cards than your Opponent (if you didnt benefit from Elek). I had the situation many times where I wanted to generate more cards thru bloods and ended up dying to them before my enemy. Plus if he overdraws the bloods are gone btw. without dmg.
And the bloods are way too slow. Even if he draws them at the end he prob has full life cause theres no other dmg in the deck, while you struggle to survive with the +4hp. So he can survive easily 4-5 turns, but can you? I couldnt most of the time. And then theres the aggro games that are not in your favor.
it is a fun and new deck, but its 50-50 vs control and 25-75 against aggro at best.
I d also say rafaam or Archivist El. not both. Archivist is better because Legendarys dont clear boards und rarely heal you.
0
so what beats it? aggro or control? whats their weakness?