Hearthpwn

Try Rocket League its quite a bit faster

The Refreshing Spring Water "nerf" is nice... now it activates Ring Toss as well.

Wild's meta will never settle with the current card release schedule will it?

Yeah I agree... this card is WAY bigger issue than spring water was imo. 

Quote from TallStranger >>

Quote from P4dge >>

Quote from Terrorsquid66 >>

Quote from lalaola >>

Quote from Terrorsquid66 >>

No way.  That is so unfair to old players. I had to pay full price for my old cards and I didn’t dust them because i wanted to play wild. New players or players that CHOSE to disenchant their old cards for standard shouldn’t immediately be able to get the old cards easier just cause they want to. That’s so entitled. 
Work up your collection like everyone else had to!

 Man you are going to hate the real life.
stuff lose value, just because you payed full price when it was more valuable does not mean that you are entitled to be guaranteed compensation if the price drops. It is another story if they actually change the card, because then your product is changed by them.

 Who cares?  Games don’t have to suck like real life lmao.  I don’t want them to. In fact i want to feel rewarded for my investment and time spent in this game!  This is a digital card game. The value doesn’t have to drop unless it’s literally manipulated to. That isn’t fair to old players and the only reason you say ”haha life isn’t fair breh get over it” is because it benefits YOU this time around.

 Things lose value over time. Wild is getting harder and harder with each expansion for jew players to get into. You can ignore that and not care, that's fine for you personally but it feels like a wasted opportunity for Blizzard to help get more active players into a game mode as well as making money at the same time. From a business perspective it doesn't seem to make sense to keep them feeling like they just can't get into it. 

 You all keep saying that "things lose value over time," but that's absolutely not true. SOME of the old cards are essentially valueless, but that's true of new cards as well. Every expansion has pack filler. But the good cards in Wild are still very valuable. Reno, Kazakus, Guldan, Anduin, Loatheb, and others still are tremendously valuable. So why should you get these valuable cards for free when others have paid good money or dust for them? 

As others have mentioned, the notion that Wild decks are very expensive is simply not true. There seems to be this vision that Wild decks consist of 27 legendaries and 3 spells. That's just not true. Building a Wild deck doesn't need to be expensive. Sure, there are wallet decks, but that's true of Standard right now as well. Rush Warrior isn't cheap: the version currently on Tempostorm costs over 16k. The most expensive Tier 1 deck in Wild right now is probably Reno Priest, which "only" costs 14k, but the other ones run between 4 and 7k dust and use a sizable number of Standard cards.

Sure, if you want to create some bizarre niche deck, it's going to cost you (whether in Standard or Wild). But quite frankly that's a luxury that you SHOULD have to pay for. Lots of f2p players can't afford every Standard card. Why should anyone be entitled to doing so in Wild is beyond me.

 Because it IS wild.. and MUCH less popular "red-headed stepchild"  of game modes. Standard being the main mode makes spending 16k of dust worth it because it is the current and most popular set of cards being used. Spending anywhere near that for wild decks is supremely wasteful to many players (and probably a huge majority of new players) that would just like to dabble in Wild now and again. This problem only gets worse the more expansions move to wild.  Thrift store modes should have thrift store prices. 

If you don't really want to pay money to go to a theatre you wait until the movie comes to Netflix right? Do you complain when movies hit Netflix and everyone can watch them because you went to the theatre and spent $20 on it? Obviously not a perfect analogy... but point being things that were worth money months/years ago shouldn't always hold that value/exclusiveness.

Fingers crossed for Tickatus, Spring water and secret pally nerfs!

I dont think mages are that overpowered, even when they play Lunacy on T2. Take for instance the match I just played.

Turn 4 all the mage was able to do was:

3 cost Skull of Gudan >  0 cost sprint  > 0 cost Auspicious Spirits (which spawned him the 5/2 scorpid > 0 cost Metamorphosis  > 1 mana to deal 4 damage to kill my only minion.

Not end of the world... unfortunately i was unable to kill the scorpid so i played a 3 cost taunt.

His turn 5 was not TOO impressive either:

3 cost Nourish (to ramp to 7 mana) > 1 cost Blessing of Kings to make his scorpid 9/6 > 1 cost hero power to kill my taunt > 1 cost fireball to my face > attack with scorpid  (im still at about 15 hp here)

I decided to play my nice big turn 6 taunt  so now i have a nice beefy 4/5 on the board  ( i got him down to 25hp by this time so Im feeling OK)

Hes only got like 8-9 cards in his hand at turn 6 so what can go wrong?

3 cost runic carvings to summon 4 2/2's >  1 cost Invigorating Sermon to make the trees 3/3's and the good old scorpid 10/7  >>>  ???

I'm not sure what he did with the 5 mana he had left as at this point i conceded to go eat breakfast.

I figure the chances of him having another 1 cost fireball or 2 cost apexis to finish me off were only about 80%.. so I probably could have made it to turn 7. Thats about 2 turns longer than I last against a paladin so I feel mages might need a slight buff.

I feel like its a legendary for the wrong class. Warlocks have WAY too good of card draw with the hero power, and plot twist and other discount cards its just too easy to find and play this for the cost and power.

I'm going to have to somewhat agree, this card feels REALLY bad. I've thought very few cards needed a BIG nerf but this is shaping up to be at the top of that list. The mana cost and stats are just so strong for when it can be played, and then not even to mention the Y Sharrj shenanigans. I hate the card and can not imaging a world that it doesn't see some sort of nerf.

Quote from Rise_Before_Dawn >>

Quote from Sleeperko >>

They nerfed innervation and spreading plague.

 People seem to forget about that

 Even at 6 Spreading is obnoxiously OP and played in almost every archetype so lets not call those two changes a proper nerf.....

Oh, I made it to top 10, didn't expect that!

Quote from Inzan1ty >>

Great, now everyone will sport this same cardback on ladder.....can't ever have Individualism in HS. Unless maybe by attending eSports events.

 You're complaining that....other people got to read the solution too?
Or are you seriously implying you solved the puzzle all on your own, something that took a global effort for everyone else, and are now angry that other people are using the same cardback?

Both implications of your statement are just utterly ridiculous.

You play Goody two Shields and Blessing of Kings in your Secret Paladin??

I run Skulking in my Warlock deck. It is a hard counter to Jade, Kingsbane Rogue, Cubelock (Removes Darkpact), and Evolve Shaman (Removes Evolve & Unstable Evolution) I don't know about you, but I see alot of those 4 decks in casual/ranked.  It's not the best card, but considering Mortal Coil doesn't win me a game or not, it can just be a turn 6 play if I hold board.  Trying to call a Tech Card such as skulking bad given the current decks commonly played is simply ludicrous.

I notice that aggro players aren't really asking for balanced nerfs to cards that are anti-aggro, but they are simply wanting the game to pretty much get rid of every card that opposes aggro decks; Voidlord, Ice Block, etc. Some of these examples have included making Voidlord only playable on turn 9 or 10+ (ie aggro wanting the card to not appear on the field before turn 9, which automatically means that a decent aggro player would have won long before turn 9 so in reality the aggro player would never face against Voidlord. The suggestion to get rid of Ice Block is to make sure aggro isn't denied a very early win.)

Starting to see how one-sided these suggestions are becoming? It isn't that aggro players are trying to think of fair nerfs to compromise the tug-and-pull between aggro & control, they are wanting all cards that slow aggro down to be taken out of their way to smorcing entirely. 

FIND OUT HOW THIS SINGLE MOM MAKES €47089 PER DAY AND HITS LEGEND FROM HOME!

No one cares who gets "credit" for a deck. No matter who posted it first, hundreds or thousands of other people had the exact same idea at the exact same time. In many cases, the set of cards released will lead deckbuilders most of the way toward the end result anyway.

When a prominent player's name gets attached to a certain deck, I see it more as this person endorsing this particular list and preferring to use it over other, similar lists. I doubt any of these people gives half a shit whether you believe they actually came up with the deck in question.

If you become enraged due to a bad shuffle, you should probably stop playing card games until you grow up a little.

Quote from mst_32 >>

 If you want a somewhat serious response, it's just bad luck. Hearthstone is random enough that a 3-17 stretch, though unlikely, will happen from time to time. I went 0-6 to start the day today, and then went 6-1 over my next 7 games. As you play more games you're rank will start to converge toward what it should be based on your skill level and deck.

Don't worry too much, though. If you're a baseball fan, the Dodgers lost ten games in a row during an absolutely horrific stretch of their season this year, and then went to the World Series. You will get to Legend eventually :)