Does the card have to involve the +5 attack mechanic, or just a chicken-based card? Besides, it's really hard to find good art for chickens. Here are my ideas:
*Slaps roof of chicken* This bad boy can fit so many bombs in it.
If not, here's another idea with a bonus reference:
Edit: I just realised that Revenge Squad is a powercreep on Snake Trap. I suppose I could change it to something like "summon 3 angry chickens and attack it" to better represent the Cucco Angry Chicken Revenge Squad. Thoughts?
It never really makes sense to give a friendly minion rush on your opponents turn, or am I missing something?
Om my phone right now, so can't create the card. Will do when I get home:
Mother Hen Battlecry: Destroy an egg.
EDIT: Okay, came up with something slightly different to make it a bit more thematically fitting. Does it fit the rules (being a robo-chicken)? I'm aware Egg is not an actual race in hearthstone, nor is the definition of "hatch", but I think it's pretty obvious what the card does. I could write "destroy it" instead of "it hatches", but I believe it loses flavour. And 366 cause, well... 366 = EGG... sorry.
Three ideas. All build on the idea of passing a "curse" (vampire/werewolf) onto someone else.
I'm not sure which is better, if any are good at all, and I'm not sure if it's better with: "After this deals damage to a minion" or "After this attacks a minion"?
Lastly, I've worded it as "pass this effect onto it" instead of "give it this card text", as I feel it could be misunderstood in a way so ALL card texts would be passed onto the next target.
Can't recall. But I've seen another topic regarding this, which links to Peter Whalen posting it would cast the non-upgraded version of it. For now, you have to take my word for it ;)
The IGN-article in which Vargoth was announced states the following regarding Vargoth's interaction with schemes: " As far as schemes are concerned, Vargoth plays the base version. So you could cast Dr. Boom’s Scheme for ten armour, but at the end of your turn Vargoth will cast it for one."
@ Linkblade: Go with Edwin, I can't say much more. Great flavour, fun deckbuilding (imo).
@ Wailor: I'd go with Lady Vashj, but it seems kind of weak. If the token had a text like: "Has the card text of the previous minion.", and they for some reason were still to be considdered murlocs.
@ Whattheheck: I don't really like your Leeroy card, sorry. Not sure if it counts either?
0
It never really makes sense to give a friendly minion rush on your opponents turn, or am I missing something?
0
Om my phone right now, so can't create the card. Will do when I get home:
Mother Hen
Battlecry: Destroy an egg.
EDIT: Okay, came up with something slightly different to make it a bit more thematically fitting. Does it fit the rules (being a robo-chicken)? I'm aware Egg is not an actual race in hearthstone, nor is the definition of "hatch", but I think it's pretty obvious what the card does. I could write "destroy it" instead of "it hatches", but I believe it loses flavour. And 366 cause, well... 366 = EGG... sorry.
7
0
Why not both? Anyway, this card is pretty slow, and might be on the bad side, but it sure would be great in some sort of control-mage.
1
0
Three ideas. All build on the idea of passing a "curse" (vampire/werewolf) onto someone else.
I'm not sure which is better, if any are good at all, and I'm not sure if it's better with:
"After this deals damage to a minion" or "After this attacks a minion"?
Lastly, I've worded it as "pass this effect onto it" instead of "give it this card text", as I feel it could be misunderstood in a way so ALL card texts would be passed onto the next target.
0
Can't recall. But I've seen another topic regarding this, which links to Peter Whalen posting it would cast the non-upgraded version of it. For now, you have to take my word for it ;)
0
Short answer is no.
33
All who've played WoW know the "Bubble-Hearthstone"-Paladin.
0
Thank you for reminding me.
1
Since you're asking, horrible. And no, I'm not going to elaborate further.
0
But those are different spells? Lesser Jasper Spellstone, Jasper Spellstone, Greater Jasper Spellstone. I doubt it would cast the base version if you were to cast a Greater one.
0
I quite like it, but not sure if I think it's too similar to you know what ;) but a great card nonetheless.
0
@ Linkblade: Go with Edwin, I can't say much more. Great flavour, fun deckbuilding (imo).
@ Wailor: I'd go with Lady Vashj, but it seems kind of weak. If the token had a text like: "Has the card text of the previous minion.", and they for some reason were still to be considdered murlocs.
@ Whattheheck: I don't really like your Leeroy card, sorry. Not sure if it counts either?
1
Trying to go for the flavor, not sure if they're useable at all. Might be too busted? Heck, what do I know.