Why would you play anything but Rogue this set? Kidding. I just love the thought thats been put into this set. I've never been more excited to play this class.
I think yes because in Open the waygate text says: "Cast 6 spells that didnt start in your deck". And this card says CAST a spell so i think it should work together
It actually says right under the card that you're not casting these spells as normal spells. THIS DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS THE QUEST.
new 6/18 Void Lord taunt over 4 bodies, 3/8 taunt, 5/7 charge, mal'ganis; there's hardly an absence of demons with effects that can affect the field without them needing to attack, not to mention the size of some you can pull like a jaraxxus that you can taunt up with a 1/1 or so forth. This will see play in demon decks, others unlikely, but it's going to be more powerful than the priest dragon spam weapon in demonic decks.
You're paying 5 mana. It does nothing. Then giving your opponent a chance to react before you get ANY type of value. Weapon removal WILL be everywhere in the upcoming meta.
0
0
Why would you play anything but Rogue this set? Kidding. I just love the thought thats been put into this set. I've never been more excited to play this class.
4
WHy couldn't Blade flurry cost 3?
0
-3
This should have cost 5.
0
0
Wait, what?
1
0
If this read at the end of your turn, playable. Most things where you have wait till the beginning of your own turn are not good.
0
At the end of your turn only triggers once, so once your turn is over, its not going to trigger OTHER end of turn abilities.
3
Cool, good call. I also think this card is nuts and will set up a new type of Warlock deck.
2
Convinced this should have been a 2/1.
3
This should've cost 2. Just sooooo bad at 3 mana.
0
57% say its very good or meta defining, how are we underrating this?
6
Specifically says "This does not work with Fandral Staghelm as it isn't a choose one effect. "