Hearthpwn

If I have lethal I play it fast as shit so that I can potentially get him before he concedes.

Not to mention all their answers like Equality, Consecration, Truesilver and a board that fills up every turn.  Oh and draw a full hand off 3 mana.  Seems pretty fair. 

The problem with people who bitch about netdecking is that they'll never get over their "Samurai code of honor."  When they win with nonsense it's because they "Played fairly and in the spirit of the game."  When they lose, their opponent is just another "dishonorable" netdecker - so it doesn't count. 

You see this shit a lot in Street Fighter, google "LOW TIER GOD" - he is the walking embodiment of this bullshido dumbass garbage, if he can't win with his bad character he ragequits.

What happens if the scrub mentality player's deck is good/becomes good?  They'll switch over to a more "honorable" deck.  Unfortunately this isn't the Zak Dolan era, but that's how there becomes a metagame to counter in the first place. 

Deception is lying to other people, delusion is lying to oneself.  These guys don't really want to win.

At the end of the season, it's funny to troll players who want to get to legend or the ranked rewards at 5, so I drop down intentionally to kick them all out.

No thread lock plz, srs question.

So what even is netdecking to you? Is it literally coping a deck card for card that someone has posted online? Is it using a type of deck that is popular? If I netdeck a competitive deck someone is using and swap Big Game Hunter for The Black Knight is it still a netdeck?

If I go to make a Warlock deck and go "hey, locks lose life to gain extra cards... that has really good synergy with Mountain Giant, Twilight Drake, and Molten Giant. Maybe I should use those and some cards like Defender of Argus to make a really crushing wall for them to break though?" is that a netdeck because it contains the core cards of a handlock?

Certain decks will come up more often than others because they have SYNERGY! Certain combos compliment one another. "Warriors amass armor so maybe there's a deck that can delay the game with armor and then drop a bunch of big threats?" FFS... this game basically has deck archetypes or novelty decks. If you're using an archetype then by definition you're using something that other people have put into practice... which is why it's an archetype. If it's novelty then odds are that it has been made in a similar manner by someone before... and it didn't work well... which is why it's not an archetype.

At what point are you splitting hairs over tech cards vs core cards? OMG you opened a Mysterious Challenger and you put it into a deck with secrets? You're so unoriginal! Decks will naturally be drawn toward synergy, combos and efficiency. If you erased all traces of hearthstone from the internet you'd still fight secret pallys, face hunters and control warriors of various shapes and sizes.

I forgot I actually have a stupid deck built already. The goal of this deck is to play a Mysterious Challenger as Jaina. To get a Christmas tree of mage secrets.