• 0

    posted a message on New Neutral Epic Card Revealed - Audio Amplifier

    Only if you can get there fast enough while controlling the aggro decks. Which might only be druid - which then could just run Guff and Twig.

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on New Neutral Epic Card Revealed - Audio Amplifier

    The second copy is for consistency (if you need it - which might not be the case as you have 10 turns to draw the single copy).

    Posted in: News
  • 2

    posted a message on BG is riddled with bugs

    Why would it have anything to do with what is or isn’t going on inside Blizz?

    BGs is a mode on top of a pile of mom’s spaghetti code. That’s of course not a reason not to test, but your examples are vague at best. So it’s hard to tell, if those are bugs or correct interactions with undesired outcomes.

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on OG C'Thun Bug?

     Well, I don't know if firestone isn't recording it or if it didn't happen (which I'm leaning to), but your C'thun was obviously not buffed. It was a 6/6 in your hand and then got buffed by Leokk to 7 which it then dealt.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Should Runes be visible when Match starts?

    No, just like you don't know what archetype any other deck is that would require a different mulligan.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Mini-set Question!

    Yes, they can be dusted.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Countess Ashmore Rivendare interaction
    Quote from ZiombalaBoms >>

    I would make it faster with The Boomship

    That is 9 mana and requires a board to trade them off.

    Why not go with Flark's Boom-Zooka like suggested with the card reveal? Costs less and no need to manually kill them.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on pure paladin vs implock experience
    Quote from irhmgg >>
    Quote from hotdoghunter >>

    What exactly is your point?

    I don't understand why blizzard would do that. Especially since implock is, on average, a much more expensive deck.

     i don't know what you can conclude here, but I've had this experience in like probably 1k games; i think paladin is getting better ordered draws, the motifs for this? i dont know. probably its been known for its midrange identity so lets give them better ordered draws. 

    whatever its i actually don't have bias, i get better draw playing paladin, maybe its only me but its been the case for years

    The bias is an evolutionary trait. It is very unlikely if not impossible that you don't have it.

    Other than that it appears highly subjective. What is "better ordered draws" supposed to mean? That you draw things to play on curve that are playable immediately?

    Well, just compare the deck list: half of Imp lock are reactive cards, require infuse or are generally more expensive so you don't want to or simply just can't slam them the turn you draw them.
    In Pure paladin you might run Biggun as infuse but other than that you have very few expensive cards and only one, two and three drops. So yes, you won't draw cards that you hold for a few turns.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on pure paladin vs implock experience
    Quote from irhmgg >>

    man im not jobless to record every single game i play.

    i play both and there is no reason to lie to someone i dont know, this is my evidence. 

    you busy undermining a random report is a good evidence though 

    And there is your issue: you don't care for evidence and have no understanding of biases.

    It isn't about lying, it is that evolutionary it is beneficial for our brain to simply put less emphasis on good outcomes in favour of remembering the bad ones.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on pure paladin vs implock experience
    Quote from irhmgg >>
    Quote from Kogan >>

    It's one of those again... 

    Small sample size and confirmation bias.

     i know you work for blizzard. take a nap man, you dont know what alot means

    ... because you provided so much evidence?

    Also, alot:

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Mercenaries - Your Mythic Boss Impressions?
    Quote from Krishno_NL >>

    the upgrades you do on a character with renown is permanent? so i can upgrade my mercs with renown, without risking the upgrades will be lost? and untill which level can i upgrade them?

    The upgrades are permanent and I believe it's infinite. The other thread that showcased the fight had level 46 on Medhiv staff.

    Quote from DaShadowPriest >>

    5) All in all, it was fun for a while, but it gets boring fast.

     Have you tried the scaling? At the top there is an option to go to level(?) 100 and that will probably make it harder and increase the rewards.

    Posted in: Mercenaries
  • 0

    posted a message on Can anyone help me out to understand Reno's equipment "we're rich" ??! thx!

    Those would refer to the classic "adventurers" from Uldum: Reno, Brann, Elise and Finley.

     Or are those explorers? But I think it's them. It should be clearer with the next patch and the tag system for Mercs.

    Posted in: Mercenaries
  • 0

    posted a message on Hearthstone but it's Paint.exe (2nd movement)
    Quote from El_Jairo >>

    Isn't that the Witch Apprentice or something like a minion that gives a random Shaman spell?

     Yep!

    Quote from Dracolithe >>

    Anyway. I might be wrong but Djinni of Zephyrs?

    It could have been (as it's clearly a djinni) but the picture has the arms raised and Djinni of Zephyrs doesn't show them.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Heroic Brawliseum is This Week's Tavern Brawl

    Where did they release a miniset?

    Posted in: News
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.