Hearthpwn

And was the chance given because of that? No, there are better players that didn't get a chance from blizzard yet and are both consistent and longer at the scene. This is just a case of positive discrimination and inclusion of trans for the sake of being trans honestly,

I get that it has a positive impact and pushes the issue into a spotlight, but let's not pretend it is because of the game results. 

Quote from TheOnlyVendetta >>

Not difficult with an OP Cancer deck

 You are everything that is wrong with the community :) 
instead of being supportive to a new player and moving on you are toxic. Your parents must be really proud of you

because, you know, Uther totally fought Kel'thuzad in the second war which is it based on, right? 

I love how he ignored Reforged and pretended it doesn't exist the whole video :) 

Quote from Teuuun >>

how about just buff the low winrate classes

 That would require Blizzard giving an actuall shit about the community feedback, some good testing and them not only caring about money. Non of those is true at the moment 

So you have 80% winrate with DH and 2 out of 3 nerfs you are suggesting are to Warlock, who is DH's worst matchup? What are you expecting? 100% winrate with DH thanks to your "balance change"? 

Quote from EternalHS >>

The only change I'd consider is 10g per win (not played, losers aren't meant to be rewarded) capped at 50g. This way you're guaranteed a pack if you put in minimal effort after completing a quest but even that is too generous for me. Maybe 10g per 2 wins capped at 50g will be better.

 "losers aren't meant to be rewarded"

That is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard about this topic and you should be ashamed of yourself. The game has too many mechanics that can win you the whole game at random with no thinking or skill required. Just two hours ago I was watching Thijs who had board control the whole game, his opponent misplayed several times and lost just because his opponents Reno decided to cast plague of murlocks. 

Quote from Dorelzor >>

Then you can go f yourself. Anyone trying to ruin the fun just for the sake of winning should be punished.

Quote from Aegis24 >>

I only rope them if they start BMing 

 Did you just resurected 5 year old post just to curse at people? Are you guys mentally challenged? 

Nat Pagle just because I hate the idea of filler legendaries, which Nat became after the nerf. 

Yes, new mini-set will be only 4 cards. 

Mutanus the Devourer + Tenwu of the Red Smoke + 2x Shadowstep = Your opponent discards 4 minions

So brave... 

NOT

So I guess the conclusion is we are all racists: nobody cared about not having a single black person to the tournament and nobody seems to care.

Let's make our voices reach the skies and convince Blizzard and the community that black players matter too and should get invited. And after that we can find other thing to complain about.

Kripp was at one point the player with the highest arena win rate in the world. Do you have any idea how big of an achievement that is in a game with millions of players? Stop being sour and give credit where it's due.

Because popularity is based on performance and achievement; its not handed down to you like gender.  

Common sense has lost.  Getting invited based on gender rather than what people achieved in the game is inherently wrong.

Dh->shaman-> hunter. so when all of cheap and good decks will be nerfed, players would ask for more gold because they can't playin' p2w warrior deck and this game will be as residentsleeper as it was in cube lock meta. relax homie