How do we know this is legit. The frog prince gives unlimited mana to ur opponent. Cause he gets a coin for each coin he plays.
We do not know if these cards are legitimate. This is only speculation. It is also speculated that if these cards were to be released, the coin would be no longer considered a spell.
I went to the link and used the super-reliable google-translate:
<pre id="tw-target-text" dir="ltr" data-placeholder="Translation" data-fulltext="">Hua Tuo in the original post that this is true
Combination has been determined that broke the news information ( repair robot , a blueprint of wheat fields and catapults , goblin Technology card back), four cards are false even though it may also be a new piece of information to determine the mechanical theme
Also, assume that 4 is true, is not meant orange piece of information at least nine cards ? Each job to do , right?
Update: Another iplaymtg posts represent Garkisen already redone to six charges, plus four blood each time you use the spell (which should be a hero to increase the blood
</pre>
There is a line in there about "four cards are false". But I don't know if I'm misinterpreting that from the translation.
I do not know if these cards are absolute legit. But I do speak Chinese myself, and the translation is totally wrong. I have no idea why it was translated into "four cards are false". That line is an assumption made by the author stating that even if these cards are fake, we can still know that mech is the theme in the new expansion. As I said in my previous post, this information was confirmed by a pro hs Chinese player, which make these new cards look legit to me.
What if it's not affected by the Coin (as the only spell)? Otherwise, you'd be right. Would be a shame, if those cards are just made-up.
If the prince were legit, the coin would no longer be considered a spell. I guess blizzard's changing it to balance the advantage you obtain starting with the coin.
What if it's not affected by the Coin (as the only spell)? Otherwise, you'd be right. Would be a shame, if those cards are just made-up.
If the prince were legit, the coin would no longer be considered a spell. I guess blizzard's changing it to balance the advantage you obtain starting with the coin.
What if it's not affected by the Coin (as the only spell)? Otherwise, you'd be right. Would be a shame, if those cards are just made-up.
If the prince were legit, the coin would no longer be considered a spell. I guess blizzard's changing it to balance the advantage you obtain starting with the coin.
going second is a disadvantage
It is presumed so and it is true with most cases in arena. However in constructed, many decks will make full use of the coin and the extra card which actually make it much easier to win by starting with the coin.
What if it's not affected by the Coin (as the only spell)? Otherwise, you'd be right. Would be a shame, if those cards are just made-up.
If the prince were legit, the coin would no longer be considered a spell. I guess blizzard's changing it to balance the advantage you obtain starting with the coin.
going second is a disadvantage
It is presumed so and it is true with most cases in arena. However in constructed, many decks will make full use of the coin and the extra card which actually make it much easier to win by starting with the coin.
What if it's not affected by the Coin (as the only spell)? Otherwise, you'd be right. Would be a shame, if those cards are just made-up.
If the prince were legit, the coin would no longer be considered a spell. I guess blizzard's changing it to balance the advantage you obtain starting with the coin.
going second is a disadvantage
It is presumed so and it is true with most cases in arena. However in constructed, many decks will make full use of the coin and the extra card which actually make it much easier to win by starting with the coin.
statistics prove otherwise
Yeah you could be right. I haven't checked the official stats for it. But last time I checked in my local community, all the legend players who have their win rates recorded have at least a 5% higher win rate by starting with the coin. Also, I was only suggesting blizzard may think the coin being a spell can bring unwanted advantage which is not the same advantage tempo you suggested.
They said that they will not add any new mechanic and Mech sounds like a new mechanic to me
Mech is a card type, as are beasts, pirates, murlocks, etc...
They have indeed a different activation "on draw" but not sure if it qualifies as a whole new mechanic as we have some "draw and affect" in at least some cards (holy wrath and far sight) ...
It would definitely be classified as a new mechanic. There is currently no card in the game that has a trigger the moment it is drawn. The abilities you mentioned are just augmented "draw a card" functions. IE: Draw a card and do damage or Draw a card and reduce it's cost, and of course "draw a card" has always been in the game.
In the instance of both the Flame Leviathan and the Mine, these effects would trigger the moment they are drawn, regardless of how they are drawn, which is an entirely new mechanic for Hearthstone.
That being said, I can't remember anything stating that Blizzard would never implement new mechanics to the game. I would very much like a source on that if possible.
Overall though, I'm gonna say fake/troll. There were tons of them pre-Naxx when Blizzard was revealing a class card every week and people would troll by 'leaking' a fake one early. Basically same thing here I suspect except instead of Naxx, it's Blizzcon and the new xpac.
iron juggernaught would be really fun with the brewmasters, imagine filling your opponent's deck with 3 mines! also, the changes to leeroy and the introduction of loathed along with the possible change to coin are enough nerfs for rogue. miracle is the only combo deck in the game, let's not kill it entirelly
That's the first tell tale that these are fake. Even tho Blizzard's wording vary a lot, they would never spell out a sentence like this. It would be "When drawn" or "When this card drawn" or "When you draw this card".
I remember the leaked Kel'Thuzad's text started with "At the end of the turn" instead of "at the end of each turn",and that was obviously changed. So that argument is invalid.
That's the first tell tale that these are fake. Even tho Blizzard's wording vary a lot, they would never spell out a sentence like this. It would be "When drawn" or "When this card drawn" or "When you draw this card".
I remember the leaked Kel'Thuzad's text started with "At the end of the turn" instead of "at the end of each turn",and that was obviously changed. So that argument is invalid.
Honestly, between the new card back (goblin/mech theme) and that tweet, the possibility of these cards being legit has jumped pretty high in my mind. The only things that still give me pause are the coin mechanic, and the card causing damage when drawn, since it gives away what card you just drew.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
How do we know this is legit. The frog prince gives unlimited mana to ur opponent. Cause he gets a coin for each coin he plays.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely. Legend Seasons: 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17
Current deck: Not playing much anymore
Highest rank: legend rank 9 Highest finish: legend rank 103 Infinite Arena Player
We do not know if these cards are legitimate. This is only speculation. It is also speculated that if these cards were to be released, the coin would be no longer considered a spell.
I do not know if these cards are absolute legit. But I do speak Chinese myself, and the translation is totally wrong. I have no idea why it was translated into "four cards are false". That line is an assumption made by the author stating that even if these cards are fake, we can still know that mech is the theme in the new expansion. As I said in my previous post, this information was confirmed by a pro hs Chinese player, which make these new cards look legit to me.
If the prince were legit, the coin would no longer be considered a spell. I guess blizzard's changing it to balance the advantage you obtain starting with the coin.
going second is a disadvantage
It is presumed so and it is true with most cases in arena. However in constructed, many decks will make full use of the coin and the extra card which actually make it much easier to win by starting with the coin.
Flame leviathan and iron juggernaut are too confusing for casual players. Blizzard's main audience is the casual ios market
statistics prove otherwise
Yeah you could be right. I haven't checked the official stats for it. But last time I checked in my local community, all the legend players who have their win rates recorded have at least a 5% higher win rate by starting with the coin. Also, I was only suggesting blizzard may think the coin being a spell can bring unwanted advantage which is not the same advantage tempo you suggested.
What would the coin be if it weren't a spell?
Time is precious. Waste it wisely. Legend Seasons: 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17
Current deck: Not playing much anymore
Highest rank: legend rank 9 Highest finish: legend rank 103 Infinite Arena Player
When you have 2 hp and you draw Flame Leviathan LOL
Imagine you play Trade Prince and then opponent plays the coin, then.........infinite coin....
IF these are real, I don't think the "On Draw" effects will be affected by Spell Damage, since you never cast anything.
It would definitely be classified as a new mechanic. There is currently no card in the game that has a trigger the moment it is drawn. The abilities you mentioned are just augmented "draw a card" functions. IE: Draw a card and do damage or Draw a card and reduce it's cost, and of course "draw a card" has always been in the game.
In the instance of both the Flame Leviathan and the Mine, these effects would trigger the moment they are drawn, regardless of how they are drawn, which is an entirely new mechanic for Hearthstone.
That being said, I can't remember anything stating that Blizzard would never implement new mechanics to the game. I would very much like a source on that if possible.
Overall though, I'm gonna say fake/troll. There were tons of them pre-Naxx when Blizzard was revealing a class card every week and people would troll by 'leaking' a fake one early. Basically same thing here I suspect except instead of Naxx, it's Blizzcon and the new xpac.
iron juggernaught would be really fun with the brewmasters, imagine filling your opponent's deck with 3 mines! also, the changes to leeroy and the introduction of loathed along with the possible change to coin are enough nerfs for rogue. miracle is the only combo deck in the game, let's not kill it entirelly
that vol'jin looks like priest class legendary by the frame of the card if this is in fact real card it will make the priest hell to play against
I remember the leaked Kel'Thuzad's text started with "At the end of the turn" instead of "at the end of each turn",and that was obviously changed. So that argument is invalid.
http://i.imgur.com/LweA2i8.jpg?1
Care to elaborate?
Ben Brode just retweeted this link on his Twitter:
http://toucharcade.com/2014/10/30/blizzard-teases-hearthstone-demolisher-plans-for-blizzcon/
This makes it a lot more plausible that these cards will be revealed during Blizzcon. I'd love to play that Warrior card and blow up some people!
Honestly, between the new card back (goblin/mech theme) and that tweet, the possibility of these cards being legit has jumped pretty high in my mind. The only things that still give me pause are the coin mechanic, and the card causing damage when drawn, since it gives away what card you just drew.