• 1

    posted a message on Res Priest Will Be More OP
    Quote from sPacEtiMe19 >>

    Or just tech in any minion that spawns shitters for your opponent and screw up their entire game plan. 

    Pretty much this. If res priest starts to become dominant, the meta can easily shift around that. Zul'Drak Ritualist is a fair counter but some niche counters such as Polymorph, Hex, Plague of Murlocs etc really throw a wrench in res priest's viability. As far as the ritualist, it will only start really seeing play if what you say comes to pass and res priest actually becomes dominant enough to warrant it. I personally doubt that'll be the case but if it happens, there are already counters available.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Nerfs Announced
    Quote from Sherman1986 >>
    Quote from CasmX >>
    Quote from Sherman1986 >>
    Quote from Atramentar >>
    Quote from DickDraggin >>

    Can't say I am happy about Dragonqueen.  Are Highlander decks really a problem?

     I'm fine with it tbh, it can be kinda ridiculous otherwise, even if highlander decks aren't a problem. It seems to me like they forgot that that specific interaction could happen (although I guess they could have nerfed it last patch).

    Quote from skymarshall78 >>

    Alexstrasza nerf makes sense, and doesn't really touch the power level of the card.  It felt so random and stupid to win or lose games because you got a second Alex off an Alex.  It feels unfair enough when a highlander deck discovers one.

    Quote from Exitium >>

    Im pretty happy with these nerfs, it feels sensible. Alex was a powerspike that was a bit silly when you got multiples of her.

    Quote from 1xbenx1>>

    Dragonqueen should have always worked that way. It was stupid that it didnt.

    Quote from pilo8 >>

    someone wrote higlander decks deserve alex for surviving until turn 9, do they deserve to autowin vs non-highlander control/slow decks thanks to multiple copies of an OP rng based card? cool

    speaking in general card is just stupid. it suits this expansion well

    Quote from CasmX >>

    I'm surprised to learn other people are surprised about the dragonqueen nerf. Being able to chain dragonqueens was rare but also (stupid)ly broken. It's effect is already extremely powerful but being able to double or triple+ the effect because luck was obviously way too much. And this surprises people?

    95%+ of the time, she's going to function exactly the same, you won't even notice it. They're only removing that one incredibly broken outcome. I mean, are people that play her going to stop? Almost certainly not. I know I'll still play her.

    Stupid? Silly? LOL, hilarious comments... There are plenty of super unfair things that can happen in a game like Hearthstone and extremely ******** highrolls. They shouldn't have touched Alex, highlander decks deserve to feel super unfair sometimes just like any other type of decks. But I guess all of you hate control... -.-

     You'll get over it

    Very constructive post, dude. If you have nothing important to say or to back up your argument, just don't say anything.

    It may seem like the end of the world now, but you'll pull through, I promise. Stay strong!

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Nerfs Announced
    Quote from Sherman1986 >>
    Quote from Atramentar >>
    Quote from DickDraggin >>

    Can't say I am happy about Dragonqueen.  Are Highlander decks really a problem?

     I'm fine with it tbh, it can be kinda ridiculous otherwise, even if highlander decks aren't a problem. It seems to me like they forgot that that specific interaction could happen (although I guess they could have nerfed it last patch).

    Quote from skymarshall78 >>

    Alexstrasza nerf makes sense, and doesn't really touch the power level of the card.  It felt so random and stupid to win or lose games because you got a second Alex off an Alex.  It feels unfair enough when a highlander deck discovers one.

    Quote from Exitium >>

    Im pretty happy with these nerfs, it feels sensible. Alex was a powerspike that was a bit silly when you got multiples of her.

    Quote from 1xbenx1>>

    Dragonqueen should have always worked that way. It was stupid that it didnt.

    Quote from pilo8 >>

    someone wrote higlander decks deserve alex for surviving until turn 9, do they deserve to autowin vs non-highlander control/slow decks thanks to multiple copies of an OP rng based card? cool

    speaking in general card is just stupid. it suits this expansion well

    Quote from CasmX >>

    I'm surprised to learn other people are surprised about the dragonqueen nerf. Being able to chain dragonqueens was rare but also (stupid)ly broken. It's effect is already extremely powerful but being able to double or triple+ the effect because luck was obviously way too much. And this surprises people?

    95%+ of the time, she's going to function exactly the same, you won't even notice it. They're only removing that one incredibly broken outcome. I mean, are people that play her going to stop? Almost certainly not. I know I'll still play her.

    Stupid? Silly? LOL, hilarious comments... There are plenty of super unfair things that can happen in a game like Hearthstone and extremely ******** highrolls. They shouldn't have touched Alex, highlander decks deserve to feel super unfair sometimes just like any other type of decks. But I guess all of you hate control... -.-

     You'll get over it

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Nerfs Announced

    I'm surprised to learn other people are surprised about the dragonqueen nerf. Being able to chain dragonqueens was rare but also (stupid)ly broken. It's effect is already extremely powerful but being able to double or triple+ the effect because luck was obviously way too much. And this surprises people?

    95%+ of the time, she's going to function exactly the same, you won't even notice it. They're only removing that one incredibly broken outcome. I mean, are people that play her going to stop? Almost certainly not. I know I'll still play her.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Do you think they'll nerf priest as well?

    I personally don't think priest needs a nerf but I'm kinda curious. What would you nerf on priest exactly?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Epic Priest Card - Envoy of Lazul

    Yeah, Priest is in a really bad spot right now. It's not completely hopeless but I feel like the only deck that has any real chance is just a variation of the combo priest we've already been playing for months. That's currently what I'm toying around with and I'm still not even sure the changes I've made have actually been an improvement or not. Even then, I'd say combo priest is at best Tier 2, maybe even high Tier 3. Other classes have just got so much more power *cough* Shaman *cough*. lol

    It really sucks too because I'm not really a fan of combo priest but I feel like it's the only chance I have at actually ranking right now assuming I actually want to play Priest. Otherwise, I'd be much better off netdecking a popular shaman build for Tier 1+ ranking.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Evolve still iin standard?
    Quote from Highwayman37 >>
    I Quote from CasmX >>
    Quote from Highwayman37 >>
    Quote from CasmX >>
    Quote from Highwayman37 >>
    Quote from CasmX >>

    Your arrogance about 'IT'S IMPOSSIBLE THAT I'M WRONG RAWR' isn't going to get you any closer to an answer. Odds are, you f*cked something up and got something wrong rather than there being an actual problem that only you have experienced.

    So, my contribution to this rather pointless thread should be welcome, if for no other reason than to put your over-sized ego in check.

    Who is being arrogant or aggressive? You're the one who has asked for proof and then lectured me on how I'm mistaken in my own experience. 

    You're being an absolutely  obnoxious wanker. It was started to see if others had experienced this, if you find the thread pointless you are under no obligation to contribute to it whatsoever.  

    You are mistaken, it's not a bug, time to move on.

    Edit: or, you can prove me wrong. You know, with evidence. Until then though, you're either mistaken or an attention seeking troll. I didn't think that at first but your adamance that the possibility you made a simple mistake makes me think otherwise. Either way, show some evidence.

    I mean, hell. You may be right and it's an actual bug that needs fixing. I even said that. Until we know for sure, we kinda have to assume the far more likely scenario of you being mistaken. You're the one that went all passive aggressive and illicited my response. Proof/evidence would go a long way in adding credibility and confirming an actual problem. Again though, at this point, I'm not sure that's what you're interested in anymore. Prove me wrong.

    Nope, I was right and you were wrong.  Another poster confirmed the same thing and now there is a thread about Call of the Wild still being playable in standard.  You were mistaken from the beginning and it was your pompous, condescending attitude that caused all of this.  

    I don't need to prove anything to you lol.  Who are you the forum police? You're not even a moderator ffs.  I was never interested in your garbage contribution to this thread, I was interested in seeing if anyone else experienced the same thing.  Which they have, along with other wild cards.  It's not really your concern or business any further.  

    Although I doubt you're big enough to make one, I would certainly accept an apology for your boorish behaviour. 

    So, show some proof then. Shouldn't be hard.

    Edit: Oh, missed the part where he said, 'I don't need to prove' anything. Okay, forum troll detected. Time to move on, guy's just making sh*t up for attention. lolz. It's my fault really, I took the bait and fed the troll. That's on me. Whoops.

     The only one trolling here is you bud. I asked a simple question if anyone’s experienced the same issue I have (they have) and you chimed in calling me aggressive and arrogant and contributed nothing to this thread. Which is the very definition of troll behaviour. 

    Now piss off, you’ve certainly annoyed me so mission successful for you. 

    You asked a simple question and I simply asked if you had proof of a bug. You immediately took that as you making it all up (for some reason). I only suggested that you might have made a mistake. That's when things went off the rails and you went full troll mode, claiming you don't make things up and there's simply no way you could ever possibly make a mistake and you don't need to provide any kind of evidence whatsoever, even when I suggested that what you said very well could be accurate and correct. I have no idea why that set you off to begin with but you certainly cast the first stone and double dipped into troll mode, becoming extremely hostile and troll-like. If calling you out on it upsets you, that's a you problem.

    There was no reason for you to respond in the way you did at the mere suggestion you might have made a mistake. I didn't imply you did, just that it was a likely possibility, especially in the absence of evidence. Mistakes like this happen all the time. But, you reacted like an ass and I responded in kind. Even if you didn't start as a troll, you certainly devolved into one. You're an egotistical ass. All I did was shine some light on it and show it to the rest of the people taking the time to read this thread.

    So, here's some friendly advice for you. You're human like the rest of us. You can make mistakes. If someone suggests you might have, even if you didn't make one, it's not a personal attack against you and you shouldn't treat it as such. Don't become passive aggressive at actual constructive criticism. Sometimes, people are just trying to offer info/advice, not everything is a personal attack and not everything is about you. Improving your forum demeanor will go a long ways in preventing you from making yourself look like an ass in the future.

    At this point though, I doubt I'll be responding further. I don't have anything more to say to you. How you choose to conduct yourself from here on is up to you.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Evolve still iin standard?
    Quote from Highwayman37 >>
    Quote from CasmX >>
    Quote from Highwayman37 >>
    Quote from CasmX >>

    Your arrogance about 'IT'S IMPOSSIBLE THAT I'M WRONG RAWR' isn't going to get you any closer to an answer. Odds are, you f*cked something up and got something wrong rather than there being an actual problem that only you have experienced.

    So, my contribution to this rather pointless thread should be welcome, if for no other reason than to put your over-sized ego in check.

    Who is being arrogant or aggressive? You're the one who has asked for proof and then lectured me on how I'm mistaken in my own experience. 

    You're being an absolutely  obnoxious wanker. It was started to see if others had experienced this, if you find the thread pointless you are under no obligation to contribute to it whatsoever.  

    You are mistaken, it's not a bug, time to move on.

    Edit: or, you can prove me wrong. You know, with evidence. Until then though, you're either mistaken or an attention seeking troll. I didn't think that at first but your adamance that the possibility you made a simple mistake makes me think otherwise. Either way, show some evidence.

    I mean, hell. You may be right and it's an actual bug that needs fixing. I even said that. Until we know for sure, we kinda have to assume the far more likely scenario of you being mistaken. You're the one that went all passive aggressive and illicited my response. Proof/evidence would go a long way in adding credibility and confirming an actual problem. Again though, at this point, I'm not sure that's what you're interested in anymore. Prove me wrong.

    Nope, I was right and you were wrong.  Another poster confirmed the same thing and now there is a thread about Call of the Wild still being playable in standard.  You were mistaken from the beginning and it was your pompous, condescending attitude that caused all of this.  

    I don't need to prove anything to you lol.  Who are you the forum police? You're not even a moderator ffs.  I was never interested in your garbage contribution to this thread, I was interested in seeing if anyone else experienced the same thing.  Which they have, along with other wild cards.  It's not really your concern or business any further.  

    Although I doubt you're big enough to make one, I would certainly accept an apology for your boorish behaviour. 

    So, show some proof then. Shouldn't be hard.

    Edit: Oh, missed the part where he said, 'I don't need to prove' anything. Okay, forum troll detected. Time to move on, guy's just making sh*t up for attention. lolz. It's my fault really, I took the bait and fed the troll. That's on me. Whoops.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Evolve still iin standard?

    Well, at least there's another report to corroborate the existence of the bug. Hopefully that person (or people) took screenshots or otherwise have proof of it's existence.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Evolve still iin standard?
    Quote from Highwayman37 >>
    Quote from CasmX >>

    Your arrogance about 'IT'S IMPOSSIBLE THAT I'M WRONG RAWR' isn't going to get you any closer to an answer. Odds are, you f*cked something up and got something wrong rather than there being an actual problem that only you have experienced.

    So, my contribution to this rather pointless thread should be welcome, if for no other reason than to put your over-sized ego in check.

    Who is being arrogant or aggressive? You're the one who has asked for proof and then lectured me on how I'm mistaken in my own experience. 

    You're being an absolutely  obnoxious wanker. It was started to see if others had experienced this, if you find the thread pointless you are under no obligation to contribute to it whatsoever.  

    You are mistaken, it's not a bug, time to move on.

    Edit: or, you can prove me wrong. You know, with evidence. Until then though, you're either mistaken or an attention seeking troll. I didn't think that at first but your adamance that the possibility you made a simple mistake makes me think otherwise. Either way, show some evidence.

    I mean, hell. You may be right and it's an actual bug that needs fixing. I even said that. Until we know for sure, we kinda have to assume the far more likely scenario of you being mistaken. You're the one that went all passive aggressive and illicited my response. Proof/evidence would go a long way in adding credibility and confirming an actual problem. Again though, at this point, I'm not sure that's what you're interested in anymore. Prove me wrong.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Evolve still iin standard?

    Your arrogance about 'IT'S IMPOSSIBLE THAT I'M WRONG RAWR' isn't going to get you any closer to an answer. Odds are, you f*cked something up and got something wrong rather than there being an actual problem that only you have experienced.

    So, my contribution to this rather pointless thread should be welcome, if for no other reason than to put your over-sized ego in check.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Evolve still iin standard?
    Quote from Highwayman37 >>
    Quote from CasmX >>

    Not to be that guy but..... ummmm...... you got any proof?

     What a weird thing to make up...I'm not making a thread about how I won 3 golden legendaries in one pack or anything.

    In definitely occurred in standard post rotation, anyways I guess it was just a one time thing.

    It's less about you making things up and more about you simply being mistaken. If you had evidence of this actually happening, it would be a bug that would need to be reported and ultimately fixed. Odds are though, you're simply wrong about something and your brain has tricked you into believing this occurred when it actually didn't happen, at least not in the way you remember it.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Unintelligent Design

    Well, it's not really news that Zeph still isn't 100% perfect. There's been enough Trolden videos and live streams to prove that.

    The one thing I do know it's he's still being worked on to account for more situations so he'll perform better in the future. If the fact that he's screwed you over a couple times bothers you and you just need to vent, you may want to check out the salt thread. If you want to post feedback, you're better off going to the official forums.

    Otherwise though, I'm not sure what you (op) want to discuss. There's not much to say that hasn't already been said many, many times over. Zeph is still a fantastic card and unlike pretty much every other card ever, it continues to get improvements. It's likely never going to be 100% perfect, ironic as that may be. Not sure what else there is to discuss.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 5

    posted a message on Have mechs been nerfed into the ground?

    It's less that mechs have been nerfed so much as other strategies have been buffed. The increase of Junkbot from 4 star to 5 star was a pretty big hit but that isn't the only contributing factor. Murlocs got major buffs around the same time mechs were nerfed. Primalfin Lookout and Coldlight Seer were both lowered a tier, allowing them to not only be purchased earlier but having more of them available overall.

    Of course when murlocs became more powerful, menagerie also by extension became slightly more viable as well, edging mechs out of their comfortable top spot to where things were slightly more balanced and competitive. However, with the even more recent updates and the introduction of King Bagurgle, I think murlocs have now become the uncontested best strategy currently in the game. I think Blizzard took things 1 step too far in bringing up murloc power.

    So, Junkbot being nerfed to 5 star definitely played a small role but ultimately it's the buffing of the other archetypes that's made mechs less competitive as a whole. That's just my 2 cents.

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on Evolve still iin standard?

    Not to be that guy but..... ummmm...... you got any proof?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.