• 0

    posted a message on Balancing wild format
    Quote from CoKrokToPrd >>

    I dont know if i can call myself an experienced wild player. As i read the title, i felt like, yeah...wild needs some balancig. But i didnt think of the cards you mentioned.

    The only 2 ******** cards atm are the hunter and warrior quests. To fast, to simple, to strong. Remeber how HL Priest used to be "to strong" with the 0 mana hero power? Haha yeah, at least you needed like 15 turns to make the combo even possible. Hunter quest can do this in 6 turns. The warrior quest deck is just to powerful. The thing that makes it so strong imo, is the ability to draw and add stuff to your hand all the time. Its almost impossible to run out of steam.

    Pirate warrior is more manageable because it plays for board but hunter feels invincible except for their bad draw or weakness against decks with armor/lots of heal and even if you had all the armor/heal needed the games are still boring because nothing interesting happens on the board. I'd suggest to make the hero power not able to target minions. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Balancing wild format
    Quote from Lel__Thuzad >>
    Quote from PetiteMouche >>

    Wild as a whole is broken, nerfing 2 strong cards won't do anything for how the format plays out, there are literally hundreds of OP cards and more importantly combinations of cards.

    I say 2 cards because Blood of Ghuun and Celestial alignement are nowhere near broken. Big priest rant is typical noob behavior.

    And your arguments are pretty weak for someone who pretends to be an experienced wild player. Arbor up being a 5 mana 8/6 in your mind is fascinating when most of its power comes from buffing existing minions and not droping two 4/3s on the board. Blood of ghuun being broken because "free 5/5" really ? How is 8 mana free anyway ?

    And yeah, ice block is strong and frustrating, but an experienced wild player would know all the many ways you can play around ice block, with tech cards, counter decks and legit skill.

     Well atleast tell me one deck that counters quest ignite mage if you are that experienced.

     

     Don't you think Sorcerer Apprentice is a much bigger problem since it enables the combo and many other mage combos as well? And those combos are fast, you'd be ok with something like Open the Waygate + Vargoth I think

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Fractured in Alterac Valley - New Hearthstone Expansion Details - Hero Cards & Special Event - Launches December 7th!
    Quote from Pagan >>

    Gonna call it now, "honorable victory" will be clunky as fuk.

     Have you seen any cards? It can be something like battlecry deal 3 damage, honorable victory reduce the cost of spells in your hand by (2). 

    Posted in: News
  • 1

    posted a message on Future of Heartstone.
    Quote from Jonesy978 >>

    The game needs a massive reboot. They had a chance last year with the new core set for each class but they blew it. Too many broken idiot cards remain and the sets are simply too powerful.

    There is so much potential here, but it's just wasted. I hope the entire Team 5 is fired and new blood is brought in. 

     Everything starts from the mindset. Just look at the questlines for example. Some are ridiculously broken (one got banned in wild) and see play, some are so bad they can't compete with the others. It's always been like this. Whenever they print a new mechanic, some cards have to be literally unplayable. Remember the DKs? Half of them were bad/ too slow. Remember the og quests? Caverns Below was op while the rest sucked. How about just making every new mechanic playable (but not broken) so any player can be happy when they get the free sample? Like imagine you have another friend and you both open a questline from the first 10 packs. You get the priest questline while they get the warlock one. Fair, huh? I'm aware this won't change but deep down I always hope they have a change of heart.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Future of Heartstone.
    Quote from palamanian >>

    I love how upset people get that the game isn't dying, and also that instead of just not playing it, they feel the urge to comment and literally get upset about it. 

     Because Hearthstone is a great game at its core and we love it but we can't stand how the company brings the game to ruin just to earn some easy money. And don't worry, I'm not playing the game these days, just reading and commenting on forums like everyone else probably. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Future of Heartstone.
    Quote from Foxie768 >>

    Problem is major. Problem is people who likes playing face hunter. I mean its impossible to understand these people. You are playing a STRATEGY game and you just copy the brain dead deck from somewhere , then try to win game within 4-5 rounds. 

    And when those kind of players increase company is going to serve them. 

    You can not complain the game and play agro decks. The cards cost more than 7 is garbage right now. 

    Questlines supposed to be harder to complete from old quests. But they are not. On turn 6-7 people playing the rewards and within 2 round game is done. 

    Trash meta. Playing since grand tournament. Im absolutely sure this is the worse meta. 

     

     

     At least update your rant. Face hunter is not the same obnoxious aggro deck any more. It's still an aggro deck but you have a few decisions. Target your rant at aggro druid please. That's the brainless deck atm.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Future of Heartstone.
    Quote from Nashrow >>

     

    Cards are cool, nice combos and so on but everything is decided around turn 5 or 6.

    In my opinion we really need more Control decks, and less otk / full face decks.

     I agree as long as you're not talking about control decks like Elysiana warrior or control priest. I hate fatigue decks more than anything else although the current OTKs come close. In the recent past, I loved Galakrond warlock, that's the kind of control deck that I would love to see more in the game. Control decks with a win condition are great to play. Remember Renolock? I think that was regarded like one of the best decks of all-time in terms of fun. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Future of Heartstone.
    Quote from user-18143276 >>

    Constructed is becoming a dead format. Dont know why people torment themselves with it. Its also disgustingly rigged. 

    BG, while also rigged, is a more fun experience. I play BG exclusively. Most people play BG. 

    Mercenaries, duels, tavern brawl, arena are also very dead. No one plays them. 

     I'm not sure what kind of sadists work at Blizzard but it's pretty clear the community enjoys playing for board more than anything else. That's why BG is a popular mode right now, it's the only mode where you can build up stats on the board.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place! V2

    So good to switch to questline mage and destroy everyone including people with the golden card back. Yeah, sure, the deck is tier 3. Keep sucking VS' and HSReplay's dicks. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place! V2

    I love how people are so slow to play their turn but so fast to emote 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place! V2
    Quote from Kurgo >>
    Quote from AndreiRO >>
    Quote from Pherosizm >>

    I'm so glad that quest mage is considered such a low tier, bad deck, so that when I lose to it I can feel even worse because certainly I should not be losing to such a low tier, bad deck.

    What the fuck is wrong with me, huh?

    Fuck creativity, fuck fun cards and fuck board interactions. Just get all your shooty spells and point them upstairs because you really don't need anything else in this game.

     It's definitely a good deck and all the pros who say otherwise can go fuck themselves. I don't even win with elemental shaman or hunter all the time which are supposed to be good against it. And no, I'm not bad at the game. When mage draws the nuts, you can't do anything. It's the most underrated deck in the meta for some reason (maybe because good players play double Neophyte, double watch post in every single deck?? )

     Uhm, it's not pros who say the deck is tier 3 (and incidentally, pros have been snubbing questline mage forever in tournaments, for pretty obvious reasons), but stats from both hsreplay and vs. If you keep losing to it with decks that have 53% wr (ele shaman) and 68% wr (face hunter) then either you're unlucky, your opponent is lucky...or you're not playing very well the matchup. Elemental shaman isn't dominant in any way shape or form against mage but if you keep losing to questline with a deck that has a 68% wr against it across ladder and a 72% wr in legend...well, the problem is probably you, not the opponent's deck.

     Go suck it elsewhere. I'm not playing the matchup wrong, face hunter and elemental shaman are pretty easy decks to pilot in the first place. I know how to win with face hunter against questline mage, I'm not dumb to proc barrier when I don't have to. I still lose a fair amount of time which just shows the power of that deck. Now go back to sucking VS and HSreplay and don't reply to me

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Your best build & stats (Battlegrounds)
    Quote from Cleedek >>

    What about the Unstable Ghoul? :D

     Hey, at least I was looking for the golden one, ok? Had the 2nd copy frozen and was going for the 3rd but unfortunately my opponent managed to die :D

    Posted in: Battlegrounds
  • 0

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place! V2
    Quote from emkarab >>

    It's actually incredible people complain about Quest Mage or Evolve Shaman when meta is too fast for these decks to even exist on competetive level.

    Fuck Mr Smite

     I mean, if turn 7 otk from quest mage is slow we have a great meta out there. Yooppy!!

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place! V2
    Quote from Pherosizm >>

    I'm so glad that quest mage is considered such a low tier, bad deck, so that when I lose to it I can feel even worse because certainly I should not be losing to such a low tier, bad deck.

    What the fuck is wrong with me, huh?

    Fuck creativity, fuck fun cards and fuck board interactions. Just get all your shooty spells and point them upstairs because you really don't need anything else in this game.

     It's definitely a good deck and all the pros who say otherwise can go fuck themselves. I don't even win with elemental shaman or hunter all the time which are supposed to be good against it. And no, I'm not bad at the game. When mage draws the nuts, you can't do anything. It's the most underrated deck in the meta for some reason (maybe because good players play double Neophyte, double watch post in every single deck?? )

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place! V2

    How fun is HS. I have to watch the stupid garrote rogue deal their otk because I'm too high hp to have my game count for the quest otherwise, a game which was lost the moment I had to passed 2 turns because of unplayable draws. Fun!

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.