Hearthpwn

you are really immature and over reacting

Quote from highlycuriouscase >>

it's a low possibility but sure it will happen sometimes. And in those situations match-up matters, if we are against a control deck that might end up badly. if we are against a tempo/midrange deck, then 0 mana 8/8 doesn't bothers me that much. And remember there is also a chance that Tickatus might be in bottom 5/10 cards in your deck and loses it's value. it's better getting him from Archwitch Willow rather than that :)

 Well, against aggro Archwitch is also not playable card, at turn 8 we are already winning the game or we are dead. But against control/combo, like shaman, warrior, priest Tickatus is our main win condition. So Archwitch will be nearly dead card, because we dont want to play it before we played Tickatus. So Archwitch looks like playable card on curve only against midrange decks.

I like concept of Archwitch and I have this legendary from pack, but I will not include it in deck sadly. I'll better include one more Twisted Nether to combo it with Strongman.

 EDIT: yea, and I forgot that we are loosing battlecries too, and value from summoning 2 demons can be low in this deck, there are lot of cheap demons here

overall i agree with you and your replacements. thx for taking time to write a helpful comment. But anyway i didn't try this deck yet and i will give Archwitch a chance on expansion release, after some games 2nd nether probably a better fit an i will remove her and dreadlords i suppose.

I was about to reply to my other comment when I saw this. I agree with everything s1ayer said, I also wanted to add that Tickatus is kind of awkward to corrupt - not incredibly, but still a little.
You're right on Cascade having enough cards to corrupt, I completely forgot about C'thun's pieces :)
hcc, sorry if my comment was too forward or something. I wasn't trying to be hurtful. Sorry if it seemed that way.

:(

Btw asking for upvotes like this only led to your post literally being -3 on reddit. I think you need to be less combative and hear what people here are saying because they are all valid points.

It doesn't help that you chose to not have any kind of explanation of how the deck is to be played and why some cards are there to begin with.

There is a difference between saying "pls i am begging you, upvote me on reddit" and "you can upvote me if you like the deck". In this case it was clearly the second one. 

And i don't hesitate saying what i think, if i am thinking they are wrong. What do you want me to say? Should i lie? 

And i am %100 sure you know some people downvoted every single one on reddit for winning the mega bundle, but yeah let's misslead that to win this argument buddy :))) Also it was not negative when the competition end so idc about what it is right now, even if it gets 100 downvotes.

Archwitch Willow is really bad in this deck, 80% of the time it pulls really small demons with useful battlecries. Tickatus is malused, it's a good body but it's negative effect is pricey (and is difficult to corrupt here). Keli'dan is meh, C'thun has no synergy except Polkelt, very weak, and Cascading Disaster is difficult to corrupt because there aren't enough 5 and 6 cost cards.
I might be wrong on every single one of those points, but worth considering.

So you are basicly saying that i am losing my add 2 soul fragments/give a minion +3 attack and life steal or 2 dmg aoe value with Archwitch Willow. And you are ignoring the fact if i don't have those cards in my hand i don't have those USEFUL battlecries. I don't get it, to base that on your words if i am playing archwitch, i should be at eight mana. Are those battlecries really useful on 8 mana?

So even if we lose the Tickatus which is unlikely (probably happens in 1/15 or even less,but yeah it has a demon tag i am not blind guys) C'Thun is there for secondary win con. 

Actually this deck runs 8(eight) 5/6 mana cards if you look at closely and 16/33 cards are bigger than Cascading Disaster but if you think it's still not enough it might be true who knows. 

And if i choose not to run Archwitch Willow in this deck i probably not run Enhanced Dreadlord soul package and the Brittlebone Destroyer. So it will be completely a different deck and for that reason speaking about cutting only Archwitch from this deck is kinda pointless. 

So many demons without Kanrethad Prime? 

Yes you have some small demons that might not be great resurrects but the upfront discount on demons will be huge in a tempo based demon deck!

Also you have 8 non-demons in the deck vs 13 demons which makes Free Admission super inconsistent when it comes to the discount mechanic. My suggestion would be to cut the excess baggage like Brittlebone Destroyer and Archwitch Willow (For Willow, you have too many cheap demons and it offers no upfront value like Kanrethad Ebonlocke.

Polkelt is also a dead card in hand until you have played FOUR 5 cost spells as well. Just my two cents!!

how did you see the quest, is there a new quest which has camouflage?

The demons we have in this deck, sure gives us a tempo but the tempo is not the purpose. the purpose is not passing our turns and giving enemies something to keep them busy, so Midway Maniac taunt is basically heals for 5. Or the Man'ari Mosher does almost same thing too. Kanrethad Ebonlocke is not a good card in this deck cause let's imagine: so if we play him on 2 what's the next move? We can't play Spirit Jailor that turn unless it's a top deck cause if we had it we would have played it on turn 1. So are you planning to play Fire Breather on next turn and kill the Kanrethad Ebonlocke or just playing Man'ari Mosher for 2 mana, then the 1 mana floats anyway. It will die soon and we can't get that much value you are thinking of. and yeah you said it right resurrecting demons would be ok but it's not a win con. all the demons we are running except Tickatus are saving us from death. If they live we can trade/SMOrc, if they die no big deal.

I am skipping the quest part of your comment cause it's nonesense

Lorekeeper Polkelt 's job is not drawing the C'Thun, the Shattered it should draw the any bigger card which is removal,thinning or helping corrupt. Cutting it might be ok, even better but it's also not a bad card in this deck imo. 

I copy pasted my comment from another deck lol thats on me. Kanrethad is just too good a card to pass up in a deck with so many demons imo.

Its okay to have differences in thinking, ill test this deck as well as my own version that I submitted for reddit.

Nice deck, however Archwitch willow may disrupt our Tickatus

it's a low possibility but sure it will happen sometimes. And in those situations match-up matters, if we are against a control deck that might end up badly. if we are against a tempo/midrange deck, then 0 mana 8/8 doesn't bothers me that much. And remember there is also a chance that Tickatus might be in bottom 5/10 cards in your deck and loses it's value. it's better getting him from Archwitch Willow rather than that :)

Nice deck! What do you think about Demonic Studies and Felosophy?

If you asking those cards for generating more Tickatus to mill your opponent, i am thinking it's a bit greedy, destroying your opponent's 10 cards is really powerful already. No need for making that 20. Maybe 15 would be worthy but you will win anyways if you burn their 10 cards. 

If you asking those cards for making a synergy with our other demons, they will be runnable for sure. But i don't know which cards are worth to cut for making some space.

If you think running Demonic Studies for a cheap Tickatus most case scenario you will end up playing the discovered demon before Turn 7 (which is the earliest turn you can play your Tickatus if you are a reasonable person).  Idk it's worth or not.