Paladin Murloc Card Reveal: Grimscale Chum
A new Paladin Murloc card has been revealed on the Taiwan site gnn.game.com.
Follow us on Twitter @HearthPwn to get notified of new card reveals as they happen. Also check us out on Facebook!
Learn More About Mean Streets of Gadgetzan!
Want to see all the currently revealed cards and learn more about the expansion? Visit our dedicated guide!
Really they called the card Grimescale Chum? Grimescale cum comes to mind, but I got a dirty mind I guess xD
Murloc synergy ?? What a joke
Strictly better Murloc Raider. Beyond that, in an appropriate deck it's 3/2 worth of stats for 1 mana, which is great. Has a similar drawback to Gadgetzan Jouster (in that you need to fulfil a specific criteria, in that case winning a joust), but this won't require a dice roll - you'll know you're getting the buff the moment you play it.
Of course, as I'm sure has been mentioned it decreases the quality of Murloc Knight fetches, so that's something.
Meh... another RNG +1/+1 card, but only for murlocs this time around.
"Paladin +1" is going to be a meme.
You know, except for the fact that this is the grimy goon's faction mechanic.
This is a really good card assuming Murlocs are good... Paladin already has the best Murlocs and Maybe this and another card can potentially push an aggressive or midrange version, who knows
No Pally Weapon?
BOOOOOOOOOOOO!
These powercreeps make me sick
It's a class cards, doesn't count as powercreep.
The art is sick.
So Blizzard was like "Hey, let's make a super cool Murloc ninja … and make sure that the other Murlocs in the set are unplayable with it"!?
Wait, a card that buffs murlocs is "unplayable" with a murloc? A murloc that especially wants + Attack?
Are 1-cost minions - or any battlecry minions, or minions without card text - "unplayable" in a deck with Barnes, then?
What's next?
President Murloc?
Piece of shit, where's my dragon cards for Paladin?Blizzard?
Dragons hardly fit the Gadgetzan theme, unless they abuse Caverns of Time somehow, which i assume will be a standalone expansion/adventure.
Well the theme is here, I'm more doubtful with the result.
I'd say it's pretty obvious that they removed it just for the sake of killing OTK Anyfin. Which is a good thing, in my opinion.
Well Anyfin was the problem, not Old Murk-Eye. If they did not want OTK then why ever make Anyfin? nobody would use it otherwise.
Blizzard: "we have a problem because of a card we made....let's ban a card that's only became powerfull because of Anyfin instead of making Anyfin different"
wp blizzard, wp.......
Ps. they need to make every Promo/Reward cards Standard. They only banned them from Standard because of Old Murk-Eye and that card is not overpowered in any sense.
I love murlocs so much but why do I have to play paladin or shaman to play decent murloc deck??
yeah but beasts suit to hunters and druids like pirates do to warriors and rogues.
Why for example do murlocs suit to paladins?