• 0

    posted a message on [TOP Rank 69] Legend Midrange shaman

    Tunnel Trogg is the strongest 1 drop in the game.. You need to consider mana cost rather than deck slot. 

    Lighting storm isn't as important due to the maelstorm portal+spell damage combo

    Posted in: [TOP Rank 69] Legend Midrange shaman
  • 1

    posted a message on [TOP Rank 69] Legend Midrange shaman

    If you have trouble with freeze mage, then replace one Lightning Storm for Eater of Secrets would probably better. Tunnel Trogg is kinda too important

    Posted in: [TOP Rank 69] Legend Midrange shaman
  • 0

    posted a message on Velen's Miracle [OTK Rez Priest]

    What's your opinion on replacing a Polluted Hoarder With sylvannas windrunner? Since you usually want to wipe board on turn 5, turn 6 sylvanas can be really hard to remove

    Posted in: Velen's Miracle [OTK Rez Priest]
  • 1

    posted a message on Cheating in Ranked?

    Don't smoke so much weed is the solution

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Are there any viable control decks left ?

    "It's too boring"

    Then seriously no deck will ever satisfy you, they all get boring after a while

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • -7

    posted a message on N'zoth Warrior

    Would it be fine to use harrison in place of cairne?

    I know it's a deathrattle and stuff, but I just don't like 2 yeti for 6 mana

    Posted in: N'zoth Warrior
  • 5

    posted a message on Bog Creeper

    Yes, this card is the corrupted version of Fen Creeper

    Posted in: Bog Creeper
  • 0

    posted a message on Why does Control Warriors run Harrison?
    Quote from Remster101 >>
    Quote from sherry0212 >>
    Quote from Remster101 >>

    Harrison is a tech card. Sometimes control warrior runs it, sometimes they don't. The meta has a good amount of weapons in it right now.

    Control warrior doesn't RELY on getting to fatigue and winning through golden monkey. That is one way they can win in the control matchup. When you are against a deck that is fast or midrange they still need to make some tempo plays and blow up the opponent's resources. Harrison is a great way to do this.

    On top of that, you really want to draw a lot if you aren't against control, since you need to find your good answers deep in your deck (like brawl).

     But since most of cw's cards are reactive, wouldn't it often cause you to overdraw since you had so many cards in hand? 
     Maybe in the case of doomhammer but most shamans aren't running that these days. The other weapons won't overdraw too much. Killing a 1 durability weapon is worth running harrison.
     Why not ooze then? if my purpose is just to destroy the weapon, it's a lot cheaper
    Posted in: Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on Why does Control Warriors run Harrison?
    Quote from Remster101 >>

    Harrison is a tech card. Sometimes control warrior runs it, sometimes they don't. The meta has a good amount of weapons in it right now.

    Control warrior doesn't RELY on getting to fatigue and winning through golden monkey. That is one way they can win in the control matchup. When you are against a deck that is fast or midrange they still need to make some tempo plays and blow up the opponent's resources. Harrison is a great way to do this.

    On top of that, you really want to draw a lot if you aren't against control, since you need to find your good answers deep in your deck (like brawl).

     But since most of cw's cards are reactive, wouldn't it often cause you to overdraw since you had so many cards in hand? 
    Posted in: Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on Why does Control Warriors run Harrison?

    I'm a little bit confused on this one. From what I know, control warrior relies on getting into fatigue and use golden monkey to win the game, so shouldn't they try to use as few draws as possible? Harrison does destroy weapons but it would usually lead into cw going into fatigue first

    Just want an explanation, I love dragon and control decks, and now I'm trying to decide between Chillmaw and Harrison Jones. (I don't care about TGT rotating out next year)

    Thanks in advance

    Posted in: Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on Flamewreathed Faceless

    Used in 34.49% of Shaman decks in the past 30 days

     

    Posted in: Flamewreathed Faceless
  • 0

    posted a message on Do you have all alternate heroes?

    I have all of them besides medivh, since I bought khadgar first. Kinda regret it now, khadgar really isn't that well made compared to the other ones, and you don't get a card back.

     

    Edit:

    Also a ranking of the skins based on my opinion.

    Magni gotta be the best, awesome animations (dat hammer), cool emotes, and even an interaction with brann.

    Lady Liadrin is pretty good too, I play a lot of paladin, and I like her a lot. She doesn't have anything special tho, just personal opinion.

    Alleria is also very good. Her voice is also very soft, a very big bonus that she replaces that fker rexxar.

    Medivh have some really awesome animations, but not many people have him. Medivh summons medivh anyone?

    Tyrade--the melons :D.  Kinda sad she's in a dead class tho.

    Morgl is pretty cool, but if you put the funny factor away, all of his quotes are just mrgls which i'm tired of already.

    Khadgar is the worst imo, but I guess I did support the pandas

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 9

    posted a message on Barnes

    You don't have answer to a 1/1?

    Posted in: Barnes
  • 0

    posted a message on Malygos druid after nerfs?

    Yogg isn't what makes malygos good

    Nobody was playing him when WOTOG came out, he just recently got popular with karazhan, which have a lot of spell oriented cards and arcane giant, that's what made him popular now

    Posted in: Druid
  • 1

    posted a message on Best Nerf / Worst Nerf - Balance Changes 6.1.3
    Quote from AtrediesHS >>

    Best: CotW. It should be 10. How Tuskarr even got printed is beyond me but I've stopped trying to understand blizzard lately. 

    Worst: Execute, Rockbiter.

    Execute comes with a disadvantage and this makes absolutley no sense to me. The increase will make tons of difference in the early game but blizzard obviously want ppl to go face and give up on control warrior. Either that or they want ppl to buy new expansions that replaces this staple card. 

    Rockbiter wasn't the problem. Doomhammer IS the problem. 

     It's obvious you never played warrior
    The nerf to execute doesn't affect much, they almost always have spare mana to use it. 
    This is a nerf to tempo warrior (dragon, etc) they needed it to keep their board and they often don't have the extra mana
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.