Hearthpwn

Hunter getting a new Hero Card is quite nice because Rexxar's rotation is a huge blow to Hunter's endgame.

Exactly what I was thinking. Everyone complaining about Hunter getting a new hero card, when the old hero card will be gone soon anyways - this is critical step for Rexxar to not revert to his old SMORC-ing ways! We can't let him fall off the bandwagon again!

So, Charged Devilsaur and Charge are both cards in the game - but the thing is, they were made before witchwood - before Rush was officially a thing. As such, should they get a retroactive rework? Or is it not necessary? What do you guys think? I've made examples of what I mean.

See? Effectively the same thing, just modernized with more efficient text. What do you guys think?

I'm actually kinda pumped for this expansion now - ESPECIALLY after seeing what they did to Diablo. This looks incredible compared to that.

Lol, literally nobody cares about hearthstone anymore - the announcement crowd had absolutely zero hype. What a joke. 

Not to mention - if they're gonna be silly, they could at least have gone all the way and called him "Sir Annoys-a-lot". I mean come on, they didn't even try.

So I managed to get a golden Bolvar Fordragon as well as a golden Luna's Pocket Galaxy. Note I don't have regular versions of either of these. Should I disenchant one/both? Luna seems potentially really useful, but at the same time, Mage has no good minions, and it's basically a 7 mana do nothing on turn it's played (compare that to Barnabus the Stomper - yeah, quest reward, but even with that it's still a 5 mana 8/8). As for Bolvar, I don't think I've seen him played since he was released. What do you guys think?

Quote from TrueHorde >>

 Do people think Hearthstone is an adult game?

Everything about Warcraft and Hearthstone is aimed for kids and teens, you are just grown-ups complaining about kid games.

 Gravity falls is a kids show. Mario bros is a kids game. Steven Universe is a kid's show. Yet they all have devoted fan bases. How is Hearthstone any different.

I do too, honestly. It brings back memories of GVG, my first expansion.

And we thought the gnome warlock was bad...

I swear, I've been fighting this guy since Witchwood's release, and it's freaking impossible. All your steal mechanics are useless because he's also a rogue, Tess has ZERO weapon control in any of her picks, and even if she did, it wouldn't matter, because he gets the damn kingsblade for free every single turn.

How the actual hell do I beat this guy?

So I just had the wierdest fucking priest match I've ever had in my life.

Jerks around for like twenty turns doing absolutely nothing, then does this weird-ass bullshit for like 30 minutes where he plays test subject and topsy turvy a bunch of times, farts around, then ropes and suicides.

What... Is this some kind of gag? What kind of retard would pull shit horse shit. Like seriously. What a waste of my time. I legitimately want an explanation for what the hell he was doing.

So... I REALLY want zilliax, and I have several useless legendaries lying around. The question is, whcih of these are actually useless, and which might have some use later? I mean I know a lot of people say to never dust legendaries, but... come on. It's these or zilliax in a mech meta.

Alternatively there's Zerek, Master Cloner... but I kinda want to keep him, he seems kinda useful.

I used to think it was just okay.

Then I remembered that Archmage Antonidas existed.

Jesus fucking christ. How did anyone think this was acceptable at blizzard.

STOP TRYING TO MAKE Mecha'thun VIABLE. it's a gag card. It's not meant to be played seriously. It's for memes. Give it up.

Considering replacing thunderheads with those 2/4s which benefit from overload