I've been playing since beta and also don't consider myself smart enough to make decks. Playing the game and making decks are different skills. Like me, you might be better at executing a plan than making a plan.
I enjoy it. I typically try to win with low tier decks most of the time though. My advise is to try another game that you might enjoy more if you aren't feeling it right now. Don't worry about whatever progress you might have, just do what you like.
I certainly don't think it's bad. This shouldn't be view as a card where you expect to have the eggs hatch. It should be looked at as a card where you opponent needs access to twoindividualsources of damage to kill of the eggs. This typically would be two already on-board minions which won't be able to make their typical trades during your opponent's turn (if said available minions have higher than 3 damage it could save you or your minions considerable health) or by spell. That effect makes things more awkward for the opponent than I think we are giving credit. In good competitive games, we shouldn't expect the eggs to hatch, but if they do hatch it has a high potential upside.
Good design. Effect similar to hunter's mark... Combo's with Unleash the Hounds... Also synergizes with the hunter's new ability to use it's hero power to target minions.
It will seem broken until you play it as a two mana card draw one card spell enough times. The odds of drawing this card early plus a dragon early aren't high enough for it to be broken. That being said, a good card.
Via Mulligan, easy. Dragon Synergy has been around since Blackrock and fulfilling the condition was never a problem. There is a 1-cost dragon for priest and a 2-drop for Warrior with the condition and and in the Blackrock meta they were good cards.
This boils down to the content of the deck using the card. Sure, it was easy to fulfill the condition when you had a high number of dragons in your deck and the dragon deck itself is good. You are saying the deck will be good and contain a lot of dragons and I'm saying it won't be good enough to make it OP. Dragonmaw Scorcher and Crowd Roaster aren't as good as Azure Drake. Though Emerald Explorer is definitely going in the deck. Realistically neither of us know. The answer is dependent on other conditions not yet revealed.
It will seem broken until you play it as a two mana card draw one card spell enough times. The odds of drawing this card early plus a dragon early aren't high enough for it to be broken. That being said, a good card.
my b*t had fun qing with this deck watching the replays of the mmr matching it against the same fucking deck was priceless.. blizzard get fucked your coding is a joke as well as your matchmaking......i need to make a video exposing the the fucking joke the ladder matching is in this game. its so goddam predictable based on what deck you q with. The meta is truly fucking horrible right now......30 games the b*t played against this exact same deck 17 times......get fucked blizzard. The gig was up 5 years ago
0
This card might be extremely useful
0
Lots of new content, should be fun.
2
I kinda like that the Leokk one's ability becomes relatively stronger at 1 mana. I'm not mad at this design.
2
I've been playing since beta and also don't consider myself smart enough to make decks. Playing the game and making decks are different skills. Like me, you might be better at executing a plan than making a plan.
0
As far as defensive cards go, this one belongs in the top tier of linebackers like Sludge Belcher and Khartut Defender. Ray Lewis would be proud.
2
I enjoy it. I typically try to win with low tier decks most of the time though. My advise is to try another game that you might enjoy more if you aren't feeling it right now. Don't worry about whatever progress you might have, just do what you like.
1
I certainly don't think it's bad. This shouldn't be view as a card where you expect to have the eggs hatch. It should be looked at as a card where you opponent needs access to two individual sources of damage to kill of the eggs. This typically would be two already on-board minions which won't be able to make their typical trades during your opponent's turn (if said available minions have higher than 3 damage it could save you or your minions considerable health) or by spell. That effect makes things more awkward for the opponent than I think we are giving credit. In good competitive games, we shouldn't expect the eggs to hatch, but if they do hatch it has a high potential upside.
0
Not a bad tech card to counter particularly fast metas. We haven't seen a lot of control decks lately, this might help create a bit more variety.
4
Good design. Effect similar to hunter's mark... Combo's with Unleash the Hounds... Also synergizes with the hunter's new ability to use it's hero power to target minions.
0
Seems ok but I don't think it would be worth adding to a Galakrond deck. Kappa.
0
This boils down to the content of the deck using the card. Sure, it was easy to fulfill the condition when you had a high number of dragons in your deck and the dragon deck itself is good. You are saying the deck will be good and contain a lot of dragons and I'm saying it won't be good enough to make it OP. Dragonmaw Scorcher and Crowd Roaster aren't as good as Azure Drake. Though Emerald Explorer is definitely going in the deck. Realistically neither of us know. The answer is dependent on other conditions not yet revealed.
1
It will seem broken until you play it as a two mana card draw one card spell enough times. The odds of drawing this card early plus a dragon early aren't high enough for it to be broken. That being said, a good card.
3
Or you can judge their practices without the use of racial slurs. 15 yard penalty, replay first down.
0
triggered
2
I just ignore what they're saying and start talking to them about stuff that has nothing to do with Hearthstone.