I don’t play shudderwock but I wish people would shut the fuck up about it. Seriously? The animation is why it shouldn’t have been printed. Brain dead. This isn’t an interesting topic to discuss. Seriously, shut the fuck up already.
I just opened 37 packs of Witchwood and only opened Duskfallen Aviana. To make it worse, it was like the 39th pack from my last lego and it was my only lego in those packs.
You don’t nerf Warlock because not everyone wants to play warlock. You nerf Patches cause everyone does play Patches. That’s why it was nerfed, cause everyone could play him. That’s why Raza is still playable post nerf, cause you have to play priest highlander to play him. You don’t nerf cards that are good if you meet X condition. You make more conditions with equal power. The important thing is requiring a condition makes each “good card” more unique and improves variety. Classic needs more class legendaries imho, and everyone needs a voidlord for their favorite class.
The reason why lock isn’t getting nerfed is cause what makes lock good doesn’t work in token Druid, or Aggro Hunter, or Tempo rogue. Lock is what you want. You want buffs for other classes, not nerfs for warlock.
Aggro is fairly boring on hearthstone. Using aggro on hearthstone, you create a bunch of vanilla minions for cheap, which isn't fun to those who don't play aggro.
The issue is Aggro isn't unique to each class. Every deck is Patches, two Seahand Captains, Prince Kelseth, Corridor Creeper, Bonemare, then just slam other cards and it's Aggro. The deck shouldn't be called Aggro. It's telling just looking at the name. What the game needs to be is put a patches, or a kelseth, in each class instead of neutral. That would allow for a much more creative environment, which is why aggro is lacking.
Going back to the original point. The reason people who don't play aggro are the way they are is likely because aggro is boring due to having no variance. We don't necessarily care about playing a deck just to have the deck that is winning the most, which isn't to be confused with being a good deck, just the most common, or, basic.
1
I don’t play shudderwock but I wish people would shut the fuck up about it. Seriously? The animation is why it shouldn’t have been printed. Brain dead. This isn’t an interesting topic to discuss. Seriously, shut the fuck up already.
0
I just opened 37 packs of Witchwood and only opened Duskfallen Aviana. To make it worse, it was like the 39th pack from my last lego and it was my only lego in those packs.
0
I have both and Zilliax is in more decks.
0
Zilliax is my only craft so far. Hoping for a competitive mech deck
0
Just got 1 more in 2 packs
0
Just got two (trash) legos in 15 packs
0
Face collector :( opened shudderwock and lord Godfrey :)
0
When can I open my dang packs!
0
You don’t nerf Warlock because not everyone wants to play warlock. You nerf Patches cause everyone does play Patches. That’s why it was nerfed, cause everyone could play him. That’s why Raza is still playable post nerf, cause you have to play priest highlander to play him. You don’t nerf cards that are good if you meet X condition. You make more conditions with equal power. The important thing is requiring a condition makes each “good card” more unique and improves variety. Classic needs more class legendaries imho, and everyone needs a voidlord for their favorite class.
0
The reason why lock isn’t getting nerfed is cause what makes lock good doesn’t work in token Druid, or Aggro Hunter, or Tempo rogue. Lock is what you want. You want buffs for other classes, not nerfs for warlock.
0
patches - put him in rogue class so not every deck is patches
13
If only I could delete Patches so I could create something instead of slamming the same shit in every class and calling it “Aggro”
0
The title says it all. I’m having a hard time justifying crafting him. I have 3900 dust atm, and every other cubelock card, minus n’zoth.
0
Aggro is fairly boring on hearthstone. Using aggro on hearthstone, you create a bunch of vanilla minions for cheap, which isn't fun to those who don't play aggro.
The issue is Aggro isn't unique to each class. Every deck is Patches, two Seahand Captains, Prince Kelseth, Corridor Creeper, Bonemare, then just slam other cards and it's Aggro. The deck shouldn't be called Aggro. It's telling just looking at the name. What the game needs to be is put a patches, or a kelseth, in each class instead of neutral. That would allow for a much more creative environment, which is why aggro is lacking.
Going back to the original point. The reason people who don't play aggro are the way they are is likely because aggro is boring due to having no variance. We don't necessarily care about playing a deck just to have the deck that is winning the most, which isn't to be confused with being a good deck, just the most common, or, basic.
0
I did this since I don't have Master Oakheart or N'Zoth, the Corruptor