nostalgia, pure nostalgia
I don't miss 2014 meta though, just played a bit to see if I still knew how to pilot old meta decks, after some matches I quit classic mode
5
nostalgia, pure nostalgia
I don't miss 2014 meta though, just played a bit to see if I still knew how to pilot old meta decks, after some matches I quit classic mode
15
I think this is a way to prevent decks that are just stacked with legendaries. Reno decks were just a combination of tons of different legendaries at the same time, which is hard to provide in easy bundled decks and a strain on newer players. These legendaries all seem like they'd be the only legendary in their decks, maybe with 1-2 other utility legendaries from previous sets. Since they're planning to sell preconstructed lists of cards, it makes sense to make decks as 1-2 legendary buildarounds. It makes deckbuilding clearer and it normalizes the curve of deck costs.
1
Well, I main Priest so yes, 100%
There's nothing quite like going up against another member of the Nobility, after a run of players who quit if they can't win by turn 6. :)
4
I'm looking forward to the changes! Will be nice to change things up, and if you don't enjoy that format, you can play a different one.
9
I think it will be fun
4
classic yugioh-format (aka goat) is rising as hell where you can play some of the most powerful cards ever.
3
25 new cards or a card back I never look at...yep, that's not a tough decision for me, tbh.
2
The answer is simpel. The opponent part of Blizzards target audience will rage quit if he loses against a non netdeck. Since they consider it their bird right to win the game then, losing feels like Blizzardian betrayal. They have RNG working for them, the AI rigging the game and still losing means one thing....rage.
5
Only thing worse than Blizz balance is their PR. New drama every month -_-
3
To be frank I'm tired of winning so easily due to mediocre players.
Plus let us know how you get on at the Grandmasters.
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
2
It's a lot less of an interesting collectible if every Tom, Dick, and Harry can purchase it.
3
Wow, who would've guessed such a greedy company has thin skin too.
2
Priest can't play Paladin cards and vice-versa. The Mistcaller can only be used by Shaman, so I don't really see the issue with Keleseth existing.
5
Who knows. Blizzard likes abandoning Paladin archetypes every season.
1
You're really using some mental gymnastics to skew the perception of the data to your liking. Unfortunately, you're failing to see that MMR is literally Blizzard's way of artificially bringing everyone's win-rates closer to their preferred percentage. Divisional ranking is much more fair and appropriate, as it allows for good players to climb the ladder quickly without artificial roadblocks bringing them down (Divisional matchmaking is random within your division, while MMR is doctored based on "perceived skill level").
How did you put it?
Ironic.
1
This whole conclusion is an example of someone who doesn't know how to read the data or how to ask the proper questions. The data shows that you are being kept at a 50%-61% win-rate, excluding seven outliers, one of which is at such a small sample size the data becomes redundant. This is not proof that "you are being kept at a 50% win-rate", but that you are either garbage at the game or your match-ups are being doctored to bring you closer to a 50% win-rate. I.E. you're being matched with an unfavorable opponent/class/deck in order to bring your win rate more in-line with the preferred percentage. If this wasn't the case, many players in legendary would have win-rates in the 75%-90% range.
2
If you can't handle 20-minute games, then card games aren't for you. MTG sure as hell doesn't have 3-minute matches. But, I can't stop Blizzard from catering to mobile players. Oh well.
1
Why wouldn't I?
1
While you can still get full DE value, dust it. If you want it back at some point, just craft it again.
1
How do people even have the time to dig up these old threads?